An evaluation of interdependent and independent group contingencies during the good behavior game

The Good Behavior Game (GBG) uses an interdependent group contingency to improve classroom behavior. Despite the wealth of research on the effectiveness of the GBG, some teachers may have concerns about their students’ abilities to work in teams, particularly if they have a history of poor social skills. We used an alternating treatments design to compare the relative effectiveness of the GBG with interdependent and independent group contingencies in a classroom for children with emotional and behavioral disorders. Our results showed that both versions of the GBG reduced verbal disruptions, inappropriate sitting, and off‐task behaviors for all children. However, the majority of children preferred the interdependent arrangement. We discuss how these results may promote more widespread use of the GBG with children with substantial behavioral challenges.     

Exposure and communications training in the treatment of agoraphobia

Twenty-one agoraphobics participated in a 6-month study designed to (a) compare imaginal flooding under high- (no sedation) and low- (sedation used) anxiety conditions: (b) examine the long-term effects of imaginal flooding in the absence of further exposure treatment; and (c) explore the impact of communications training on chronic anxiety and panic attacks. A reevaluation of the effects of sedation is presented in this report.Imaginal flooding without sedation was, on the whole, superior to the attention control placebo and imaginal flooding with sedation on therapists' and clients' ratings of fear and avoidance. However, the superiority of the non-drug flooding group cannot be attributed (as was concluded in an earlier report) to higher levels of anxiety across flooding sessions. Rather the drug (methohexitone sodium) appears to have impeded across-session habituation, perhaps by interfering with long-term memorial processes.The effects of imaginal flooding without sedation were stable over 4 months without further exposure treatment. These clients did receive training in solving important interpersonal problems through self monitoring and increased expressiveness. Contrary to hypotheses, not only was no further improvement obtained on fear and avoidance with this treatment, but also anxious mood and panic attacks remained unaffected. It is surprising to note that in-vivo treatment was no more effective than imaginal flooding on fear and avoidance. These and other findings suggest imaginal flooding well warrants further study.     

Sports competition and its influence on self-esteem development

Competition and its influence upon the adolescent is the primary concern of many recreational agencies. In the past ten years, many youth agencies have de-emphasized competition in their programs because of its negative influence upon self-esteem. There is a need to examine the relationship between competition and self-esteem so that recreational programs can be better designed to utilize competition as a positive factor. A study was undertaken to examine self-esteem in relation to competition in a basketball program. It was found that the coach's assessments of ability and intention of participation are important factors in positive self-esteem development. The social aspects of peer interaction and parent influence also contribute to positive self-esteem. These are minor elements, however, in comparison to the impact of the coach. There needs to be intensive training for coaches on how to develop positive self-esteem and how to deal with the range of participation styles.     

Executive Functioning and Emotion Regulation in Children with and without ADHD

Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology - Difficulties with emotion regulation affect the majority of youth with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and predict greater...     

Information processing bias against emotional facial expressions in social anxiety

The present study examined whether information processing bias against emotional facial expressions is present among individuals with social anxiety. College students with high (high social anxiety group; n  = 26) and low social anxiety (low social anxiety group; n  = 26) performed three different types of working memory tasks: (a) ordering positive and negative facial expressions according to the intensity of emotion; (b) ordering pictures of faces according to age; and (c) ordering geometric shapes according to size. The high social anxiety group performed significantly more poorly than the low social anxiety group on the facial expression task, but not on the other two tasks with the nonemotional stimuli. These results suggest that high social anxiety interferes with processing of emotionally charged facial expressions.     

The influence of prior offender/victim relationship on offender stalking behavior

The present study examined the influence of prior offender/victim relationship on offender stalking behavior. The actions that were present within the stalking offences were recorded using content analysis of victim and witness statements, and all other relevant material within the police files of 50 stalking cases. The sample was analyzed using a non‐metric multidimensional scaling procedure known as Smallest Space Analysis. The results suggested that when a prior sexual relationship existed between the offender and the victim the offender was more likely to engage in a majority of controlling style actions. However, an offender who did not have a prior sexual relationship with the victim was more likely to engage in a majority of infatuation style actions. Therefore, the study lends support to the influence of prior relationship on the actions that offenders engage in over the stalking period. Implications of the study and future research ideas are discussed. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

The Fantasy Engagement Scale: A Flexible Measure of Positive and Negative Fantasy Engagement

Despite the prevalence of fantasy activities in day-to-day life, there has been little systematic psychological research on fantasy. Existing work is scattered across numerous fantasy-related topics and are rarely viewed as a collective body of work. We propose a scale of fantasy engagement that addresses this scattered and often-contradictory literature by assessing both positive and negative aspects of fantasy engagement. Across four studies we develop and validate the Fantasy Engagement Scale, establishing its reliability, validity, and applicability to topics including well-being, escapism, and mental imagery. The results begin to reconcile contradictions in the existing research and have implications for future work on fantasy specifically and for studies of fantasy-related activities.     

The Black Box effect: sensory stimulation after learning interferes with the retention of long-term object location memory in rats

Reducing sensory experiences during the period that immediately follows learning improves long-term memory retention in healthy humans, and even preserves memory in patients with amnesia. To date, it is entirely unclear why this is the case, and identifying the neurobiological mechanisms underpinning this effect requires suitable animal models, which are currently lacking. Here, we describe a straightforward experimental procedure in rats that future studies can use to directly address this issue. Using this method, we replicated the central findings on quiet wakefulness obtained in humans: We show that rats that spent 1 h alone in a familiar dark and quiet chamber (the Black Box) after exploring two objects in an open field expressed long-term memory for the object locations 6 h later, while rats that instead directly went back into their home cage with their cage mates did not. We discovered that both visual stimulation and being together with conspecifics contributed to the memory loss in the home cage, as exposing rats either to light or to a cage mate in the Black Box was sufficient to disrupt memory for object locations. Our results suggest that in both rats and humans, everyday sensory experiences that normally follow learning in natural settings can interfere with processes that promote long-term memory retention, thereby causing forgetting in form of retroactive interference. The processes involved in this effect are not sleep-dependent because we prevented sleep in periods of reduced sensory experience. Our findings, which also have implications for research practices, describe a potentially useful method to study the neurobiological mechanisms that might explain why normal sensory processing after learning impairs memory both in healthy humans and in patients suffering from amnesia.

One of the most puzzling phenomena of memory is that we forget, and since its beginning as a scientific discipline, psychology has been trying to find out why and how this happens (Ribot 1882; Ebbinghaus 1885; Müller and Pilzecker 1900; Burnham 1903)? Addressing this question, Jenkins and Dallenbach (1924) published a remarkable study in 1924 suggesting that much forgetting arises from continued mental activity caused by ongoing everyday experiencing that normally follows learning in natural settings. Their intriguing findings were not systematically pursued during the next decades, as the focus shifted to exploring the role of prior or subsequent learning on forgetting; that is, effects of proactive or retroactive interference of highly similar material on memory retention. This research program eventually led into a dead end (Tulving and Madigan 1970; Wixted 2004), and interference research in humans slowed down in the 1970s. In recent years, however, interest about the neurobiological bases of interference began to emerge again (Appleby and Wiskott 2009; Bartko et al. 2010; Blake et al. 2010; Butterly et al. 2012; Luu et al. 2012; Martínez et al. 2012; Winocur et al. 2012; Peters et al. 2013; Alber et al. 2014; Censor et al. 2014; Martínez et al. 2014; McDevitt et al. 2014; Albasser et al. 2015; Eugenia et al. 2016; Koen and Rugg 2016; Ge et al. 2019; Peters and Smith 2020).In their original experiment, Jenkins and Dallenbach (1924) used sleep to reduce the amount of interference after learning. They found that when their participants went about their normal (university campus) day after learning a list of nonsense syllables, their ability to recall the lists 1, 2, 4, or 8 h later was always poorer than when instead they slept during the time between learning and test. Jenkins and Dallenbach (1924) concluded that their results “indicate that forgetting is not so much a matter of the decay of old impressions and associations than a matter of the interference, inhibition, or obliteration of the old by the new.” Their findings were replicated by others, confirming that being asleep, compared with being awake and active, indeed improves memory retention (Van Ormer 1932; Ekstrand 1967). However, it remained an open question whether it is the reduction of sensory stimulation and new learning, which would usually occur during wakefulness, that prevents retroactive interference, or whether a specific, possibly sleep-dependent, memory facilitation process was at play (Ekstrand 1967, 1972).Noting that participants in the sleep condition did not immediately fall asleep in the original experiment, but that they experienced increased quiescence shortly after learning, Minami and Dallenbach (1946) tested the retroactive interference explanation of forgetting more directly, by controlling the amount of stimulation after learning in awake animals. This remarkable experiment used Periplaneta americana (American cockroach) and a little treadmill. After learning to suppress their natural tendency to run into a dark shelter box in a bright open alley (encouraged by an electrical shock received in the dark shelter), the cockroaches were either placed on a running treadmill in a transparent box, or in a normally lit circular transparent resting chamber, where they were not able to fall asleep but experienced notably less activity than the cockroaches on the treadmill. The outcome was that cockroaches who were forced to move presented with more forgetting than those who were not, suggesting that sleep—notwithstanding its possible beneficial effect on memory—may not be necessary to promote memory retention; rather, reducing the amount of stimulation and activity after learning may be critical for attenuating retroactive interference and thus forgetting.Some six decades later, a series of experiments picked up this original line of inquiry. Exploring in humans whether memory for short prose, word lists, or spatial knowledge benefits from reduced stimulation after learning, these studies have invariably replicated the main finding that spending a 10-min retention interval in quiet wakefulness in a dimly lit room after learning leads to better memory for the learned material than participating in unrelated cognitive tasks during the retention interval (Dewar et al. 2007, 2010). Increased memory for the acquired material following quiet wakefulness is long-lasting and can be detected up to 7 d after learning (Dewar et al. 2012; Alber et al. 2014). Even in amnesic patients 10 min of reduced sensory stimulation, compared with participating in cognitive tasks, enhances memory retention for verbal material (Cowan et al. 2004; Dewar et al. 2009, 2010). This lends strong support to the suggestion that the memory loss in amnesia arises from an increased vulnerability to interference shortly after encoding (Warrington and Weiskrantz 1974; Hardt et al. 2013)Similar results have been obtained in rodents in studies exploring the role of perirhinal cortex in object recognition memory. Rats with lesions to the perirhinal cortex typically show robust impairments in object recognition tasks (Brown and Aggleton 2001; Mumby et al. 2002, 2007; Norman and Eacott 2005; Albasser et al. 2015). However, if rats are placed into a dark box during the retention interval between the encoding phase and the test phase of an object recognition task, rats with lesions to perirhinal cortex no longer show a memory deficit and perform as well as intact animals (McTighe et al. 2010). Thus, reduction of sensory stimulation between encoding and test appears to enhance memory for objects even in rats with perirhinal cortex lesions. This finding recapitulates the outcomes of the studies with human patients suffering from amnesia after hippocampal damage.The aim of the current experiments was to determine whether reducing sensory stimulation after encoding would also enhance hippocampus-dependent memory in rats. To do this, we used a spontaneous object exploration task that assesses memory for object locations (Ennaceur and Delacour 1988; Hardt et al. 2010; Migues et al. 2016, 2019). Using this approach, we replicated in rats the basic effect that quiet wakefulness promotes memory retention as previously observed in humans. Specifically, here we show that following learning, everyday activity in the home cage with cage mates impairs object location memory in rats, while reducing sensory stimulation in a dark chamber, without sleep, promotes it.     

Nanotechnology, Contingency and Finitude

It is argued that the social significance of nanotechnologies should be understood in terms of the politics and ethics of uncertainty. This means that the uncertainties surrounding the present and future development of nanotechnologies should not be interpreted, first and foremost, in terms of concepts of risk. It is argued that risk, as a way of managing uncertain futures, has a particular historical genealogy, and as such implies a specific politics and ethics. It is proposed, instead, that the concepts of contingency and of finitude must be central to any understanding of the ethical significance of nanotechnologies, as these concepts can be used to understand the basis of recent work in science and technology studies, and the sociology of knowledge more widely, which details the multi-dimensional social nature of technological uncertainty.