The lexicalization process in sentence production and naming: indirect election of words

A series of experiments is reported in which subjects describe simple visual scenes by means of both sentential and non-sentential responses. The data support the following statements about the lexicalization (word finding) process. (1) Words used by speakers in overt naming or sentence production responses are selected by a sequence of two lexical retrieval processes, the first yielding abstract pre-phonological items (L1-items), the second one adding their phonological shapes (L2-items). (2) The selection of several L1-items for a multi-word utterance can take place simultaneously. (3) A monitoring process is watching the output of L1-lexicalization to check if it is in keeping with prevailing constraints upon utterance format. (4) Retrieval of the L2-item which corresponds with a given L1-item waits until the L1-item has been checked by the monitor, and all other L1-items needed for the utterance under construction have become available.A coherent picture of the lexicalization process begins to emerge when these characteristics are brought together with other empirical results in the area of naming and sentence production, e.g., picture naming reaction times (Seymour, 1979), speech errors (Garrett, 1980), and word order preferences (Bock, 1982).     

The effect of dextroamphetamine on habituation of peripheral vascular response in children

The blood volume pulse (BVP) measured by a photoplethysmograph was recorded in 43 children with behavior and learning problems before and after either stimulant drug treatment or placebo. A series of twenty-four 750-cps tones was presented at 10-sec. intervals, with one trial having a doubled interval and one with a halved interval. A 1,000-cps tone was introduced following the 24th trial. As predicted, the drug-treated subjects showed significantly more rapid habituation to the tones. They also showed more variability of BVP following the longer intertriai interval, but showed less variability following the introduction of the high tone. The results are interpreted as showing that the stimulant has the effect of raising autonomie arousal level with consequently more rapid habituation of the orienting response.An earlier version of this article was presented to The Society for Psychophysiological Research, Monterey, California, October 1969. This research was supported by Grant No. MH14432 from the Psychopharmacology Section (National Institute of Mental Health) and Research Scientist Development Award No. K2MH7839 (National Institute of Mental Health).     

Examination of factors which might disrupt a learned association between pentobarbital and LiCl

Injections of a sedative dose of pentobarbital (Pent) were followed 30 min later by injections of a toxic dose of lithium chloride (LiCl). As a result of these Pent →LiCl pairings, injections of Pent after consumption of saccharin solution failed to produce the usual saccharin aversion. This loss of the capacity of Pent to produce a flavor aversion is called Avfail. Experiment 1 showed that the Avfail effect was obtained with saccharin even though the rats consumed a novel vinegar solution prior to the Pent→LiCl pairings in Phase 1. This was surprising since the novel flavor was associated with the LiCl and ought to have overshadowed the association of Pent with LiCl. Experiment 2 showed that one set of Pent→LiCl pairings can produce two Avfail effects in sequence: the first with a novel flavor and the second with a flavor previously paired with LiCl sickness. It also showed that insertion of Pent injections and handling cues between the Pent→LiCl and the Flavor→Pent phases did not reduce the magnitude of Avfail. Experiment 3 showed that the Avfail effect was not disrupted by the insertion of 54 saline injections between the Pent→LiCl and Flavor→Pent pairings, nor by interposing 26 saline injections between each pair of Flavor→Pent trials. This seemed to exclude an important role for injection cues. Experiment 3 also showed that 4 exposures to Pent and 50 exposures to saline between the Pent→LiCl trials and the Flavor→Pent trials and 26 exposures to saline injections between each pair of Flavor→Pent trials did not reduce the magnitude of Avfail. The same exposure to Pent and saline injections did reduce the magnitude of the saccharin aversion shown by the LiCl→Pent group. These data are viewed as consistent with Lett's (Drug-drug associations: Evidence for the conditioning of a compensatory response. Paper presented at a meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, New York, 1981) suggestion that Avfail represents a learned antisickness response.     

Surface dyslexia: A case report and some theoretical implications to reading models

This paper reports on the psycholinguistic investigation of a surface dyslexic aphasic patient's abilities to handle written material. The analysis of paralexic errors produced in reading aloud single words and nonwords classically suggested that the patient was using an analytical strategy parsing the letter string stimulus, from left to right, into graphemes, and assigning phonemic values to graphemes. The patient's results were found to be sensitive to irregularities in correspondence between graphemes and phonemes not only in reading aloud but in lexical decisions, writing on dictation, rhyming, and written-word comprehension. Moreover, the patient's linguistic behavior brought out the reverse pattern observed in deep-dyslexic performances within word/nonword and content/function word dimensions. It was found that some semantic information about written words could be retrieved from both phonological and nonphonological processes presumably operating concurrently and both providing converging or conflicting pieces of meaning to the understanding of written words. Some considerations derived from the observation of this pathological reading behavior are discussed, contributing to a psycholinguistic model of normal reading.     

Competing tasks as an index of intelligence

Most studies involving competing (or dual) tasks have been concerned with the investigation of models of attention and have stressed the importance of task characteristics in determining competing-task performance. The relatively few studies which have looked at individual differences in competing-task performance suggest that measures of this performance could reflect operations which are central to cognitive functioning. This paper examines two key questions which stem from this research: is there a separate ability involved in competing-task performance? Is competing-task performance more indicative of general intellectual functioning?A battery composed of both single and competing tasks was presented to 91 Ss. Two sets of scores, ‘primary’ and ‘secondary’, were obtained from the competing tasks. The results indicate that ‘single’ and ‘primary’ scores are basically measuring the same thing but that ‘secondary’ scores measure what is perhaps a time-sharing factor. There is also some evidence that primary and secondary scores are more indicative of the general factor, as measured by this battery, than their single counterparts.     

Attributed intentions and informational selectivity

Three experiments tested the hypothesis that ascribing a specific intention to an actor prior to witnessing his behavior leads an observer to preferentially recall action bearing on the intention. In each case, subjects were exposed to an action sequence which mixed elements appropriate to more than one intention. Recall of action was compared among different observers who were led to attribute different intentions to the same actors. Selective remembering favoring intent-relevant action is demonstrated in all three studies. The second experiment offers evidence that selectivity operates during observation of an actor rather than retrospectively. The third experiment suggests that attributions about intentions are more potent determiners of such selectivity than are characteristics of an actor related to his behavior but not bearing on his intention and indicates that observer characteristics interact with attributed intentions to determine recall. Interpretation of the findings suggests that accurate attribution of intentions can facilitate social exchange by attuning partners to the planned aspects of each other's behavior, while misapprehension of intentions can preclude coordinated interaction by misdirecting attention to irrelevant action or to responses coerced by the observer.