首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   79篇
  免费   3篇
  2023年   2篇
  2020年   1篇
  2019年   1篇
  2017年   2篇
  2015年   2篇
  2013年   3篇
  2012年   2篇
  2011年   2篇
  2010年   1篇
  2009年   3篇
  2008年   3篇
  2007年   2篇
  2001年   1篇
  2000年   1篇
  1998年   3篇
  1996年   2篇
  1994年   1篇
  1992年   1篇
  1987年   1篇
  1984年   1篇
  1983年   1篇
  1967年   1篇
  1961年   1篇
  1958年   5篇
  1957年   2篇
  1956年   1篇
  1955年   6篇
  1954年   1篇
  1953年   3篇
  1952年   4篇
  1951年   7篇
  1950年   2篇
  1949年   7篇
  1948年   6篇
排序方式: 共有82条查询结果,搜索用时 46 毫秒
51.
52.
53.
54.
55.
56.
57.
58.
59.
Biographical study distinguished high from low creative medical students by broken homelife, greater preference for movies, modern music, serious books, bridge playing and creative hobbies. High creatives seek challenge, academic or research careers, verbal and imaginative expression. Low creatives have higher motivation, better academic grades, more economic and family interests, are often oldest children and head for general practice. Independent, original explorations characterize high creativity while traditional, authoritative explanations satisfy the less creative. Fricke's Opinion, Attitude and Interest Survey made the creativity identification. Factor analysis related OAIS Scores, Omnibus Personality Inventory and Medical College Admission Test scores to cross check with biography data. A motivational Index is suggested as a predictor of supportive value to the creativity score.  相似文献   
60.
The interpretation of character motivations is a crucial part of the understanding of many narratives, including those found in video games. This interpretation can be complicated in video games by the player performing the role of a player‐character within the game narrative. Such performance finds the player making choices for the character and also interpreting the resulting character actions and their effect on the game's narrative. This can lead to interpretative difficulties for game narratives and their players: if a decision to act is made by the player, is it that the player's own imaginative reasons for acting warrant some narrative interpretations and exclude others? To answer this I argue that we need to investigate (a) the interactive ontology of video game narratives, (b) the notion of game playing as interpretative performance, and (c) the player‐character, an artifact through which performance is focused in narrative games. Doing so shows there to be at least two problems with the notion of the correct interpretation of narrative games. Neither of these problems entirely negates the normativity of game narratives, however, and so players are left with the problem of how they might decide which of the possible playings are warranted. I end by making some practical suggestions for the thoughtful and narratively interested game player.  相似文献   
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号