排序方式: 共有72条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
2.
RAPHAEL GILLETT 《Scandinavian journal of psychology》1992,33(3):277-281
Two methods of analysing data from an identification parade give rise to seemingly contradictory outcomes, both of which reach statistical significance. The traditional method is based on the first choices of eyewitnesses, whereas the paired-comparison method takes account of each eyewitness's full rank ordering of the lineup participants. The person that most eyewitnesses pick out as the perpetrator of an offence (according to the first-choice method) may in fact be the person that those same eyewitnesses as a group regard as least likely to have committed the act (according to the paired-comparison method). Implications of the paradox for the analysis of lineup data are considered. 相似文献
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
GRANT HARDY 《Journal of Chinese Philosophy》1998,25(2):273-279