首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   68篇
  免费   5篇
  2023年   2篇
  2022年   1篇
  2019年   4篇
  2018年   1篇
  2017年   5篇
  2016年   5篇
  2015年   1篇
  2014年   1篇
  2013年   11篇
  2012年   3篇
  2011年   11篇
  2010年   3篇
  2008年   1篇
  2007年   4篇
  2006年   1篇
  2005年   3篇
  2004年   1篇
  2003年   3篇
  2002年   2篇
  2000年   1篇
  1999年   1篇
  1996年   1篇
  1995年   1篇
  1993年   2篇
  1992年   1篇
  1985年   1篇
  1983年   2篇
排序方式: 共有73条查询结果,搜索用时 0 毫秒
71.
Wassermann  Renata 《Studia Logica》2003,73(2):299-319
The standard theory of belief revision was developed to describe how a rational agent should change his beliefs in the presence of new information. Many interesting tools were created, but the concept of rationality was usually assumed to be related to classical logics. In this paper, we explore the fact that the logical tools used can be extended to other sorts of logics, as proved in (Hansson and Wassermann, 2002), to describe models that are closer to the rationality of a real agent. This revised version was published online in August 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.  相似文献   
72.
ABSTRACT

STS and social movement scholars have shown the importance of ‘getting undone science done’ to advance the goals of social movements fighting environmental health injustice. The production and mobilization of counter-expertise, meaning the reliance on expertise, broadly construed, to contest regulatory decisions based on scientific knowledge, must be further analyzed by differentiating among types of expertise and strategies to mobilize them. In social mobilization against the unrestricted use of pesticides in Argentina, the affected community in Ituzaingó Anexo developed three types of expertise. The community first drew upon its own local knowledge of cases of illness and, as lay people, produced the first epidemiological map of this area. Then, they enrolled scientists and NGOs as allies to jointly learn about pesticide contamination as an explanation for illness. The enlisted scientists produced new knowledge by conducting environmental and epidemiological studies. Finally, sympathetic public health authorities, legal experts, and a district attorney designed a successful legal strategy to stop fumigations in that area and enforce local regulations. The case confirms the importance of producing undone science, and shows that its effectiveness can be explained by intertwined strategies deployed by a triad of lay/local, scientific, and legal experts to overcome the expertise barrier.  相似文献   
73.
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号