首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   20417篇
  免费   6篇
  国内免费   2篇
  20425篇
  2023年   3篇
  2022年   2篇
  2021年   2篇
  2020年   8篇
  2019年   3篇
  2018年   3483篇
  2017年   2815篇
  2016年   2246篇
  2015年   189篇
  2014年   74篇
  2013年   71篇
  2012年   565篇
  2011年   2385篇
  2010年   2516篇
  2009年   1470篇
  2008年   1701篇
  2007年   2170篇
  2006年   26篇
  2005年   210篇
  2004年   166篇
  2003年   107篇
  2002年   61篇
  2001年   30篇
  2000年   52篇
  1999年   14篇
  1998年   19篇
  1997年   16篇
  1996年   8篇
  1995年   1篇
  1994年   1篇
  1990年   7篇
  1986年   1篇
  1982年   1篇
  1976年   1篇
  1969年   1篇
排序方式: 共有10000条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
91.
92.
93.
94.
95.
96.
It seems obvious that various feelings (various kinds of affectivity) are memorized, forgotten, and recollected to various degrees. Some of them are forgotten. Some of those forgotten can be recollected, while others are lost forever. For example, short and long-lasting feelings and shallow and deep feelings are memorized and remembered in different ways. In this paper I analyse from a conceptual point of view several categories of memory-of-feelings and offer a comprehensive map of them. In the end, the richness of categories in the realm of memory is interpreted as a proof of the intricacy of affectivity.  相似文献   
97.
98.
99.
100.
The various problems associated with co-authorship of research articles have attracted much attention in recent years. We believe that this (hopefully) growing awareness is a very welcome development. However, we will argue that the particular and increasing importance of authorship and the harmful implications of current practices of research authorship for junior researchers have not been emphasised enough. We will use the case of our own research area (bioethics) to illustrate some of the pitfalls of current publishing practices—in particular, the impact on the evaluation of one’s work in the area of employment or funding. Even where there are explicit guidelines, they are often disregarded. This disregard, which is often exemplified through the inflation of co-authorship in some research areas, may seem benign to some of us; but it is not. Attribution of co-authorship for reasons other than merit in relation to the publication misrepresents the work towards that publication, and generates unfair competition. We make a case for increasing awareness, for transparency and for more explicit guidelines and regulation of research co-authorship within and across research areas. We examine some of the most sensitive areas of concern and their implications for researchers, particularly junior ones, and we suggest several strategies for future action.  相似文献   
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号