首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   88篇
  免费   8篇
  2024年   1篇
  2023年   5篇
  2022年   1篇
  2021年   4篇
  2020年   7篇
  2019年   7篇
  2018年   9篇
  2017年   8篇
  2016年   8篇
  2015年   2篇
  2014年   1篇
  2013年   9篇
  2012年   7篇
  2011年   6篇
  2010年   4篇
  2006年   1篇
  2005年   1篇
  2004年   1篇
  2002年   1篇
  2000年   1篇
  1998年   1篇
  1996年   1篇
  1995年   2篇
  1994年   1篇
  1993年   2篇
  1991年   1篇
  1983年   2篇
  1981年   1篇
  1959年   1篇
排序方式: 共有96条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
91.
92.
In this article, I argue that autonomy has to be conceived substantively in order to serve as the qualifying condition for receiving the full set of individual liberal rights. I show that the common distinction between content‐neutral and substantive accounts of autonomy is riddled with confusion and ambiguities, and provide a clear alternative taxonomy. At least insofar as we are concerned with liberal settings, the real question is whether or not the value(s) and norm(s) implied by an account of autonomy are acceptable to reasonable people, not whether these accounts are content‐neutral, procedural or input‐focused. Finally, I demonstrate how substantive constraints are compatible with, or even implied in, the notion of autonomy at play in (Rawls's) political liberalism. Overall, I present a normative reconstruction, clarification, and internal critique of liberalism, drawing on case law and statutes from England and Wales.  相似文献   
93.
94.
ABSTRACT

“Concept creep” is the gradual semantic expansion of harm-related concepts such as bullying, mental disorder, prejudice, and trauma. This review presents a synopsis of relevant theoretical advances and empirical research findings on the phenomenon. It addresses three fundamental questions. First, it clarifies the characterisation of concept creep by refining its theoretical and historical dimensions and presenting studies investigating the change in harm-related concepts using computational linguistics. Second, it examines factors that have caused concept creep, including cultural shifts in sensitivity to harm, societal changes in the prevalence of harm, and intentional meaning changes engineered for political ends. Third, the paper develops an account of the consequences of concept creep, including social conflict, political polarisation, speech restrictions, victim identities, and progressive social change. This extended analysis of concept creep helps to understand its mixed implications and sets a multi-pronged agenda for future research on the topic.  相似文献   
95.
96.
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号