Left and right visual field superiority for letter classification

Two letter classification experiments examine the hypothesis that lateral asymmetries in perceptual processing are sensitive to subtle changes in task demands. The first experiment reports a right visual field superiority for an easy letter classification, but a left field superiority for a difficult classification using the same population of stimuli. Experiment II demonstrates that the right field superiority can be reversed if the easy classification trials are embedded among more difficult trials. The implications of these results for theories of hemispheric localization are discussed.     

A dual-task analysis of detection accuracy for the case of high target-distractor similarity: Further evidence for independent processing

Previous studies of visual detection performance indicate that perceptual span has a negligible effect on detection accuracy; hence, previous results suggest that individual characters within a multielement array are perceived independently. In this study, additional experimental factors were examined in order to determine whether conditions exist in which perceptual span influences detection performance: targets and distractors were chosen to be maximally similar, and detection accuracy was studied in relation to display size, target redundancy, and homogeneity of distractor characters. To test for perceptual span effects, a three-state model was proposed which incorporates the assumption that individual characters are perceived independently. The model may be applied to (a) both yes-no and forced-choice tasks, and (b) the case when effects of display characteristics differ for response alternatives. Predictions based on the three-state model agree satisfactorily with observed proportions. Moreover, interactions between display characteristics and response alternatives accord well with model predictions, and accuracy differences between subjects are consistent with individual differences in model parameters. The results provide further evidence for the independence assumption and illustrate additional conditions for which perceptual span has a negligible effect on detection accuracy.     

Stimulus context and duration discrimination

The ability of human observers to discriminate duration was assessed in two types of tasks: (1) pulse tasks, in which the observer compared the duration of two brief increments in an ongoing sinusoid, and (2) gap tasks, in which the observer compared the duration of two brief interruptions in an ongoing sinusoid. Performance in these tasks was assessed in three different contexts: noise alone, noise plus continuous sinusoids, and noise plus continuous sinusoids chosen to induce a pitch segregation effect. Performance in the pulse task was independent of the changes in context; however, performance in the gap task changed as a function of context condition. There was a large decrement in the observers’ ability to discriminate duration when the stimulus ensemble induced the pitch segregation effect. The results are discussed in terms of the relationship between duration discrimination and stimulus variations which do not carry duration information.     

The “false consensus effect”: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes

Evidence from four studies demonstrates that social observers tend to perceive a “false consensus” with respect to the relative commonness of their own responses. A related bias was shown to exist in the observers' social inferences. Thus, raters estimated particular responses to be relatively common and relatively unrevealing concerning the actors' distinguishing personal dispositions when the responses in question were similar to the raters' own responses; responses differing from those of the rater, by contrast, were perceived to be relatively uncommon and revealing of the actor. These results were obtained both in questionnaire studies presenting subjects with hypothetical situations and choices and in authentic conflict situations. The implications of these findings for our understanding of social perception phenomena and for our analysis of the divergent perceptions of actors and observers are discussed. Finally, cognitive and perceptual mechanisms are proposed which might account for distortions in perceived consensus and for corresponding biases in social inference and attributional processes.