艾耶尔在哲学史上的地位

一、思想背景 1929年秋A.J.艾耶尔来到牛津时,他并没有想到要成一名职业哲学家。他读过两本哲学著作,一本是罗素的《怀疑论文集》(1928),一本是摩尔的《伦理学原理》(1903)。这些选择有着重要的意义。艾耶尔总是把自己看作罗素的继承人,他效法罗素的思想,包括其内容反其轻率的表达;而且在某种程度上他还效法罗素的生活方式,包括其政治态度和恋爱方式。他从摩尔那里得到的显然要少得多,尽管他也很尊重摩尔,正如《语言、真理和逻辑》序言中所表明的那样。一个重要的相似之处是,摩尔和艾耶尔都是由于其他哲学家的主张而非哲学以外的数学或科学问题、历史或日常生活问题而引发进行哲学思索的。 在20年代,正统的唯心主义在苏格兰以外的地方或多或少已经灭绝。普里查德在1915年发表于《心》上的一篇文章中激烈地批判了罗素的知识论,而且他和约瑟夫都坚持敌视罗素的逻辑。普里查德认为,作为一个伦理推断论者,摩尔是那些在道德哲学中犯了根本错误的人当中的一个。普里查德晚年出版了唯一的一部著作《康德的认识论》(1909),约瑟夫的主要著作《逻辑导论》出版于1916年。     

艾耶尔在哲学史上的地位

其次,是对知识论中关于知觉、他人心理,历史、归纳等问题的一种有益的图式化表述,这些问题起源于那种由于各种信仰(关于物质事物、过去事件,他人心理、自然规律的)和用来证明它们的唯一证据(感觉材料,记忆及其痕迹、行为和观察到的规则)之间的鸿沟而导致的怀疑主义。和这种图式的其他支持者一样,艾耶尔认识到了对待这些鸿沟的四个基本途径。一是直觉,据称它可以直接到达鸿沟的另一端;二是关于一般原则的理论,它可以用作跨越鸿沟的桥梁;三是还原主义,它可以通过定义那些被断定用来证明它们的事物填平这一鸿沟;四是怀疑主义的忧郁选择。艾耶尔还想像出第五种被称之为“描述分析法”的途径,它似乎承认这种鸿沟,但又对它无可奈何。     

今日维特根斯坦

维特根斯坦在第一次世界大战的战壕中写完他的第一本书——《逻辑哲学论》,当时他在奥地利军队中服役.一系列精雕细刻的格言由一个复杂的排列体系联结起来,并且一切都按照从形而上学到形式逻辑的方向排列.此书被罗素誉为是一部杰作.人们很快就广泛认识到这本书的重要性,特别是通过石里克、卡纳普和魏斯曼,维也纳学派认识到了它的重要性.《逻辑哲学论》立刻使维特根斯坦在哲学家的神殿中占有了一席之地.《逻辑哲学论》是维特根斯坦自己出版的唯一的一本书.有一段时间他放弃哲学去当了一名小学教师,后来又在奥地利做一名建筑师,1929年他回到剑桥,在那里断断续续地工作一直到他1951年去世.他的思想交流实际上仅局限于课堂,他在由学生和同事组成的非常亲密的     

科学变革中的进化与连续性

一、不可通约性与意义 最有影响的实证主义的意义理论曾经认为,意义的基本单位就是个体的词项或陈述,到了本世纪50年代,这些理论转而认为,理论的或语言的关系域决定着个体词项的意义。     

Compliant in a moment: a commentary on nevin

Nevin's scholarly and timely discussion attempts to maintain the precarious union of the experimentally derived theory of behavioral momentum with applications of the behavioral momentum construct to human subjects in applied settings. Nevin's discussion adds much-needed clarification to a process that at times has proven to be awkward for applied researchers. In this commentary, we will address three general questions: (a) Can the applications of behavioral momentum be derived from the theory as conceptualized by Nevin? (b) Could those applications have been developed had the theory not been formulated? (c) Does behavioral momentum theory add significantly to the compliance literature?     

One-Handed Juggling: A Dynamical Approach to a Rhythmic Movement Task

The skill of rhythmically juggling a ball on a racket was investigated from the viewpoint of nonlinear dynamics. The difference equations that model the dynamical system were analyzed by means of local and nonlocal stability analyses. These analyses showed that the task dynamics offer an economical juggling pattern that is stable even for open-loop actuator motion. For this pattern, two types of predictions were extracted: (a) Stable periodic bouncing is sufficiently characterized by a negative acceleration of the racket at the moment of impact with the ball, and (b) a nonlinear scaling relation maps different juggling trajectories onto one topologically equivalent dynamical system. The relevance of these results for the human control of action was evaluated in an experiment in which subjects (N = 6) performed a comparable task of juggling a ball on a paddle. Task manipulations involved different juggling heights and gravity conditions of the ball. The following predictions were confirmed: (a) For stable rhythmic performance, the paddle's acceleration at impact is negative and fluctuations of the impact acceleration follow predictions from global stability analysis; and (b) for each subject, the realizations of juggling for the different experimental conditions are related by the scaling relation. These results permit one to conclude that humans reliably exploit the stable solutions inherent to the dynamics of the given task and do not overrule these dynamics by other control mechanisms. The dynamical scaling serves as an efficient principle for generating different movement realizations from only a few parameter changes and is discussed as a dynamical formalization of the principle of motor equivalence.