The Impact of Type of Examples on Originality: Explaining Fixation and Stimulation Effects

There are obstacles to creativity: one of them is called fixation effect, the fact that some knowledge about existing or obvious solutions is spontaneously activated and constrains the generation of new solutions. Converging evidence in cognitive psychology has indicated that the ability to generate original ideas can be limited by recently activated knowledge, such as examples of solutions. On the other hand, neuroimaging studies have recently demonstrated that exposure to examples could, on the contrary, have a stimulating effect on originality. To make sense of what seems to be contradictory studies, we hypothesized that two types of examples could have opposite effects on originality: (1) restrictive examples—within the fixation effect—could lead to a reduction in the originality of the solutions, whereas (2) expansive examples—outside the fixation effect—could provoke solutions of higher originality. Results from a total of 160 participants confirmed that the solutions proposed by the group exposed to restrictive examples were less original than those given by the group exposed to expansive examples.     

Non-psychological weakness of will: self-control,stereotypes, and consequences

Prior work on weakness of will has assumed that it is a thoroughly psychological phenomenon. At least, it has assumed that ordinary attributions of weakness of will are purely psychological attributions, keyed to the violation of practical commitments by the weak-willed agent. Debate has recently focused on which sort of practical commitment, intention or normative judgment, is more central to the ordinary concept of weakness of will. We report five experiments that significantly advance our understanding of weakness of will attributions by showing that the ordinary concept of weakness of will is less thoroughly psychological than the philosophical debate has assumed. We begin by showing that a sizable minority of people attribute weakness of will even in the absence of a violated commitment (Experiment 1). We then show that weakness of will attributions are sensitive to two important non-psychological factors. First, for actions stereotypically associated with weakness of will, the absence of certain commitments often triggers weakness of will attributions (Experiments 2–4). Second, the quality of an action’s outcome affects the extent to which an agent is viewed as weak-willed: actions with bad consequences are more likely to be viewed as weak-willed (Experiment 5). Our most important finding is that the ordinary concept of weakness of will is sensitive to two non-psychological factors and is thus much broader than philosophers have thus far imagined. We conclude by suggesting a two-tier model that unites our findings with traditional philosophical theorizing about weakness of will.     

Conversational perspective of therapeutic outcomes: The importance of preference in the development of discourse

Major theme: Evaluation of therapeutic outcome. Logical development of the theme: We suggest a way for practitioners and researchers to assess if they are on track in conversing towards client preferred goals. We offer a critique of more conventional approaches to studying therapeutic progress, suggesting how a discursive (i.e. focused on interaction and language use) lens can address these limitations. Through this lens we examine therapeutic progress evident in ‘preference work’, where clients demonstrably indicate, imply, agree and disagree with where the therapeutic conversation is heading. Such ‘preference work’ offers a form of evidence of within‐session outcomes in a process of reaching larger client preferred outcomes. Authors’ point of view: We present the results of conversation analysis – a qualitative approach to the study of therapy – to illustrate our discursive perspective on therapy progress and change. Implications: we suggest a way for practitioners to assess if they are on track in conversing towards client preferred goals. We propose that our interactional perspective may significantly contribute to bridging practice and research in therapy.     

Sensory curation: theorizing media use for sensory regulation and implications for family media conflict

ABSTRACT

Media sensory curation theory, introduced here, complements theories of informational, emotional, and relational media gratifications. Sensory curation theory conceptualizes media devices as tools people use to help maintain sensory regulation by simultaneously capturing and curbing sensory input within built and natural environments. This article explicates the theory and introduces the Child and Adult Media Sensory Curation Inventories (MediaSCIs), separate measures of child and adult media sensory behaviors and preferences. A survey of 789 parents and adult caregivers of children ages 3 to 14 revealed moderate to strong correlations between general sensory processing and media sensory curation, validating the MediaSCIs. Controlling usage time, child media sensory curation strongly predicted problematic child media use and moderately predicted adult–child media conflict, which was four times as frequent among adult–child pairs with high MediaSCI scores than with low MediaSCI scores.     

(In)validating Stereotypes About Older Workers Influences Their Intentions to Retire Early and to Learn and Develop

Although many governments of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development are currently trying to retain older workers in the workforce, numerous stereotypes question their motivation and ability to work, learn, and develop. In two studies, we examined the influence of age-related stereotypic information on Belgian older workers' aspirations in the work domain. In Study 1, early retirement intentions were lower following exposure to positive stereotypic information than following exposure to negative or no stereotypic information. In Study 2, older workers confronted with positive stereotypic information were less willing to retire early and more motivated to learn and develop than those confronted with negative stereotypic information. Results suggest that communicating positive information about older workers' ability may boost their work aspirations.     

Differences in the acuity of the Approximate Number System in adults: The effect of mathematical ability

It is largely admitted that processing numerosity relies on an innate Approximate Number System (ANS), and recent research consistently observed a relationship between ANS acuity and mathematical ability in childhood. However, studies assessing this relationship in adults led to contradictory results. In this study, adults with different levels of mathematical expertise performed two tasks on the same pairs of dot collections, based either on numerosity comparison or on cumulative area comparison. Number of dots and cumulative area were congruent in half of the stimuli, and incongruent in the other half. The results showed that adults with higher mathematical ability obtained lower Weber fractions in the numerical condition than participants with lower mathematical ability. Further, adults with lower mathematical ability were more affected by the interference of the continuous dimension in the numerical comparison task, whereas conversely higher-expertise adults showed stronger interference of the numerical dimension in the continuous comparison task. Finally, ANS acuity correlated with arithmetic performance. Taken together, the data suggest that individual differences in ANS acuity subsist in adulthood, and that they are related to mathematical ability.     

An Inconsistency-Adaptive Deontic Logic for Normative Conflicts

We present the inconsistency-adaptive deontic logic DP ^r , a nonmonotonic logic for dealing with conflicts between normative statements. On the one hand, this logic does not lead to explosion in view of normative conflicts such as O A?∧?O ～A, O A?∧?P ～A or even O A?∧?～O A. On the other hand, DP ^r still verifies all intuitively reliable inferences valid in Standard Deontic Logic (SDL). DP ^r interprets a given premise set ‘as normally as possible’ with respect to SDL. Whereas some SDL-rules are verified unconditionally by DP ^r , others are verified conditionally. The latter are applicable unless they rely on formulas that turn out to behave inconsistently in view of the premises. This dynamic process is mirrored by the proof theory of DP ^r .     

How to explain receptivity to conjunction-fallacy inhibition training: Evidence from the Iowa Gambling Task

Intuitive predictions and judgments under conditions of uncertainty are often mediated by judgment heuristics that sometimes lead to biases. Using the classical conjunction bias example, the present study examines the relationship between receptivity to metacognitive executive training and emotion-based learning ability indexed by Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) performance. After completing a computerised version of the IGT, participants were trained to avoid conjunction bias on a frequency judgment task derived from the works of Tversky and Kahneman. Pre- and post-test performances were assessed via another probability judgment task. Results clearly showed that participants who produced a biased answer despite the experimental training (individual patterns of the biased → biased type) mainly had less emotion-based learning ability in IGT. Better emotion-based learning ability was observed in participants whose response pattern was biased → logical. These findings argue in favour of the capacity of the human mind/brain to overcome reasoning bias when trained under executive programming conditions and as a function of emotional warning sensitivity.     

Route and survey processing of topographical memory during navigation

We investigated the characteristics of route and survey processing of a unique complex virtual environment both at the behavioral and brain levels. Prior to fMRI scanning, participants were trained to follow a route and to learn the spatial relationships between several places, acquiring both route and survey knowledge from a ground-level perspective. During scanning, snapshots of the environment were presented, and participants were required to either indicate the direction to take to follow the route (route task), or to locate unseen targets (survey task). Data suggest that route and survey processing are mainly supported by a common occipito-fronto-parieto-temporal neural network. Our results are consistent with those gathered in studies concerning the neural bases of route versus survey knowledge acquired either from different perspectives or in different environments. However, rather than arguing for a clear distinction between route and survey processing, “mixed” strategies are likely to be involved when both types of encoding take place in the same environment.     

New behavioral protocols to extend our knowledge of rodent object recognition memory

Animals often show an innate preference for novelty. This preference facilitates spontaneous exploration tasks of novelty discrimination (recognition memory). In response to limitations with standard spontaneous object recognition procedures for rodents, a new task (“bow-tie maze”) was devised. This task combines features of delayed nonmatching-to-sample with spontaneous exploration. The present study explored aspects of object recognition in the bow-tie maze not amenable to standard procedures. Two rat strains (Lister Hooded, Dark Agouti) displayed very reliable object recognition in both the light and dark, with the Lister Hooded strain showing superior performance (Experiment 1). These findings reveal the potential contribution of tactile and odor cues in object recognition. As the bow-tie maze task permits multiple trials within a session, it was possible to derive forgetting curves both within-session and between-sessions (Experiment 1). In Experiment 2, rats with hippocampal or fornix lesions performed at normal levels on the basic version of the recognition task, contrasting with the marked deficits previously seen after perirhinal cortex lesions. Next, the training protocol was adapted (Experiment 3), and this modified version was used successfully with mice (Experiment 4). The overall findings demonstrate the efficacy of this new behavioral task and advance our understanding of object recognition.Understanding the neural basis of recognition memory, the ability to discriminate whether a stimulus is novel or familiar, is heavily reliant on animal research. Here, advances have been closely tied to the introduction of new behavioral tests. The preeminent example concerns one-trial tests of recognition memory for monkeys using delayed nonmatching-to-sample (Mishkin and Delacour 1975). These tasks reward the natural preference that monkeys have for selecting novel items and permit multiple recognition trials within a single session. These features make the task relatively easy to train and then maximize findings from small group sizes. Although rat tasks closely based on delayed nonmatching-to-sample have been devised (Aggleton 1985; Mumby et al. 1990; Steckler et al. 1998; Prusky et al. 2004), they are very rarely employed as they are difficult to train and performance levels are unreliable.Almost all studies of rodent recognition memory now employ the spontaneous object recognition test and its direct variants (Ennaceur and Delacour 1988; Dix and Aggleton 1999; Winters et al. 2008). These tasks again take advantage of an innate preference for novel items, but this preference is displayed by spending more time exploring novel than familiar stimuli. In the standard version of the task, a rodent (rat or mouse) is placed in an arena containing two identical objects and then freely allowed to explore these objects for several minutes (“sample” phase). After a delay, the rodent is placed back in the arena (“test” phase), which now contains one familiar object (a copy of the sample phase objects) and a novel object. Recognition is signified by greater exploration of the novel object. Because the task measures spontaneous behavior, it requires minimal pretraining, but for the same reason it is prone to considerable variance. Unlike delayed nonmatching-to-sample, each trial (sample plus test phase) takes many minutes, and so only one recognition trial is normally given per session. Advantages are that proactive interference between objects is minimized, and the one-trial design lends itself to episodic-like tests of memory (Dere et al. 2005; Good et al. 2007). Disadvantages include the fact that data accumulation, with appropriate counterbalancing, is slow.To address these limitations, a new object recognition test using a “bow-tie maze” (Fig. 1A) has been developed for rats (Albasser et al. 2010). This test combines features of delayed nonmatching-to-sample with spontaneous object preference: It permits multiple trials per session, but the measure of recognition comes from the preferential exploration of novelty. The rat is first placed in one end of a bow-tie–shaped maze that contains a single object (object A; Fig. 1B). After a minute, the rat is allowed to run to the other end of the maze where there are two dissimilar objects (A and B; Fig. 1B). Object A is familiar as it is identical to the object previously explored, while object B is novel. Consequently, a rat will typically prefer to explore object B. On the next trial, a minute later, the rat shuttles back to the initial start point, but this time encounters objects B and C. Object B is now familiar, while object C is novel. The next trial, 1 min later, is between object C (now familiar) and object D (novel), and so on. A food reward placed under every object promotes shuttling back and forth within the maze, and encourages interaction with the objects. Unlike delayed nonmatching-to-sample, the food reward is not contingent on first selecting the novel object.Open in a separate windowFigure 1.(A) Schematic of the bow-tie maze. A sliding door separates the two ends of the maze in which two objects are placed. (B) General procedure showing the presentation order of the objects in the standard object recognition task. All objects are rewarded (+). (Arrow) Rat movements. (Black print) Novel objects, (gray print) familiar objects.The present study used the bow-tie maze to explore recognition memory on four fronts. In Experiment 1, recognition in the light and recognition in the dark were compared to help determine the cues available to detect object familiarity. It is known that rats can perform recognition tasks when solely reliant on visual cues (Aggleton 1985; Bartko et al. 2007; Winters and Reid 2010), but object recognition based on other modalities remains largely unexplored (Winters and Reid 2010). Potential cues for recognition include odor differences and tactile information. It is known that rats can discriminate novel from familiar olfactory cues (Otto and Eichenbaum 1992; Kesner et al. 2002; Fortin et al. 2004; Wolff et al. 2006), while tactile (e.g., vibrissae) cues can be used to distinguish surfaces (e.g., Birrell and Brown 2000). The bow-tie maze is ideal for studying object recognition in the dark as the rats are rewarded for visiting items in set locations (to receive food rewards), and so should readily approach the objects. In contrast, running the standard spontaneous object recognition test (in an arena) in the dark would be problematic as it is not clear how the rats would first appreciate the presence of the to-be-discriminated objects.An additional goal of Experiment 1 was to determine how readily the bow-tie maze could be used to compile within-session and between-session forgetting curves. A limitation with the standard spontaneous object task is that with only one trial per session it can be very time consuming to create forgetting curves, while within-session forgetting curves for individual animals are not feasible. These shortcomings create limitations when examining manipulations thought to affect memory. The possibility of deriving within-session forgetting curves is particularly appealing as: (1) it minimized the impact of those factors that introduce variance when performance is compared across sessions, and (2) the animal need not be removed from the maze, which could additionally disrupt performance, e.g., by increasing stress. A further component of Experiment 1 manipulated object memory strength by presenting objects either once (“single”) or six times (“repeated”). Recognition was tested after a 3-h delay with the twin goals of determining whether repeated presentation would aid performance and whether these performance levels would be sufficiently above chance so that they could be used to examine factors involved in longer term memory.At the same time, Experiment 1 provided the opportunity to compare two rat strains, Dark Agouti (DA) and Lister Hooded (LH). Previous studies suggest that the Dark Agouti strain might be particularly good at visual recognition tasks (Aggleton 1996), though others have argued that this strain has aberrant behavioral properties, including higher anxiety and higher levels of inappropriate nonspatial behaviors in spatial learning tasks (Mechan et al. 2002; Harker and Whishaw 2004; but see Aggleton and Vann 2004).Experiment 2 examined the ability of rats with either hippocampal or fornix lesions to perform object recognition in the bow-tie maze. There is a longstanding debate over the impact of hippocampal damage on recognition memory, with mixed findings coming from spontaneous object recognition tests (Clark et al. 2000; Mumby 2001; Gaskin et al. 2003; Winters et al. 2008). The bow-tie maze should prove informative as numerous trials can be run to assess the impact of selective brain lesions. Although in this initial study only short retention delays were examined, these same delays and conditions are highly sensitive to perirhinal cortex lesions (Aggleton et al. 2010; Horne et al. 2010), a brain region regarded as vital for recognition memory (Brown and Aggleton 2001). In Experiment 3 the training protocol changed so that objects did not cover food rewards. Rather, a single food reward was always placed between the test objects. This modification was examined because: (1) it would preclude any exploration scores that were simply derived from attempts to move the test objects in order to uncover the food reward, and (2) it would introduce a task variant that might be amenable to small rodents not able to move objects. Accordingly, Experiment 4 examined the performance of mice (strain C57Bl/6) on a test of object recognition based on the modified version of the bow-tie maze from Experiment 3.