排序方式: 共有67条查询结果,搜索用时 0 毫秒
51.
52.
J. Angelo Corlett 《Argumentation》1994,8(2):145-156
This essay argues that Alvin I. Goldman's truth-linked theory of group knowledge (veritism) omits individual components of social cognition, that all group based theories of knowledge lead to scepticism, and that if any sense is to be made of social knowledge, it must be done on individualist lines. I argue that Goldman's veritism can be reconstructed by adopting a reliabilist theory,social reliabilism. And I argue that Goldman's objections to a particular sort of consensualism are not telling. So there are now two plausible and competing theories of social knowledge-social reliabilism and consensualism.I am grateful to Keith Lehrer and Alvin Goldman for their criticisms of previous drafts of this paper. 相似文献
53.
J. Angelo Corlett 《The Southern journal of philosophy》1993,31(3):263-283
It has recently been argued that there is probably no theory of punishment to be found in Immanuel Kant's writings, but that “if one selects carefully among the many remarks and insights that Kant has left us about crime and punishment, one might even be able to build such an edifice from the bricks provided.”1 In this paper, I seek to provide part of a foundation of a Kantian theory of punishment, one which is consistent with many, if not all, of Kant's own insights on justice. Finally, I assess the plausibility of Kant's view. 相似文献
54.
J. Angelo Corlett 《Journal of social philosophy》2001,32(4):573-584
55.
J. Angelo Corlett 《The Journal of Ethics》2003,7(4):401-402
Volume Contents
Contents of Volume 7 相似文献56.
57.
58.
J. Angelo Corlett 《Journal of social philosophy》1993,24(1):163-175
59.
60.