Evidence for the Altruistic Personality from Data on Accident Research

ABSTRACT The aim of this study was to test whether the concept of an altruistic personality was valid for first aiders who intervened to help the victims of a traffic accident. We derived a number of relevant personality variables that should be related to the willingness to administer first aid. These include locus of control, social responsibility, belief in a just world, empathy, and instrumentality. We obtained data from proven first aiders who had intervened after a traffic accident. Thirty-four of these first aiders were matched to respondents from a subject pool on the basis of sex, age, and socioeconomic status. In addition, the willingness of these respondents to offer help after a traffic accident was taken into account. Only people who indicated that they had witnessed an accident and had not helped were included in the control group. Multivariate analyses of variance and covariance indicated that proven first aiders deviated from the control group on several dimensions: They described themselves as more internal, believed more in a just world, and emphasized more social responsibility and empathy.     

Combining shape and position expectancies: hierarchical processing and selective inhibition.

Two experiments report the effects of generating a concurrent position expectancy and form expectancy. Ss were precued to a stimulus position where 1 target shape was most probable, and they made a speeded 2-choice response to the orientation of the displayed shape. Response time (RT) was faster for an expected position than an unexpected position and faster for a likely shape than for an unlikely shape. This replicates the work of Lambert and Hockey (1986). It was also observed, however, that when a stimulus appeared at an unexpected position where 2 shapes were equally improbable, RT was slower for the shape that had been likely rather than unlikely at the cued position. This finding is incompatible with the probability-matching hypothesis of Lambert and Hockey. The data support a hierarchical-expectancy model of attentional selectivity.     

Patterns of perceived similarity cannot be generalized from long to short exposure durations and vice versa

Subjects rated the perceived similarity between patterns and their 180-deg rotational variants. The stimuli, adapted from Halpern, Fishbein, and Warm (1979), were randomly generated dot patterns and line drawings and polygons generated from the dot patterns. Inspection time was varied in a between-subject design. As in the Halpern et al. (1979) study, it was found that the variables of form type (dots, lines, polygons) and axis of rotation (x, y, z) had no effect on perceived similarity in the long exposure conditions. However, when inspection time was limited to 150 msec, both variables had a substantial impact. This finding undermines the frequent practice of selecting stimuli for use in reaction time or other experiments with limited inspection time on the basis of similarity ratings gathered under typical free inspection conditions.