排序方式: 共有35条查询结果,搜索用时 4 毫秒
31.
Erin M. Cline 《Dao》2007,6(4):361-381
This paper argues that a comparative study of the idea of a sense of justice in the work of John Rawls and the early Chinese
philosopher Kongzi is mutually beneficial to our understanding of the thought of both figures. It also aims to provide an
example of the relevance of moral psychology for basic questions in political philosophy. The paper offers an analysis of
Rawls’s account of a sense of justice and its place within his theory of justice, focusing on the features of this capacity
and how it develops. It then provides an account of the sense of justice in Kongzi’s thought as it is seen in the Analects. Finally, it shows how examining the similarities and differences between the two accounts can deepen our understanding of
both views, as well as our appreciation for the importance of understanding how a sense of justice develops. 相似文献
32.
Brendan Cline 《Philosophical Psychology》2017,30(8):1043-1063
In The Moral Problem, Michael Smith argues that only motivational internalists can offer an adequate explanation of why changes in moral judgment tend to be accompanied by changes in motivation in morally virtuous people. Smith argues that the failure of motivational externalism to account for this phenomenon amounts to a reductio of the view. In this paper, I draw on dual-process models of moral judgment to develop an externalist response to Smith’s argument. The key to my proposal is that motivationally efficacious states are often the source of our moral judgments, and changes in judgment are typically the result of changes in these states. However, moral judgments can also be formed via an alternative pathway that does not necessarily affect motivation, and so motivation and judgment can come apart. This response not only defuses Smith’s objections to externalism, but challenges Smith to square his internalist proposal with the empirical details of moral judgment. 相似文献
33.
34.
35.