Journal Reviews

B ritten , S. (London). 'Children first.' Criminal Justice
J oseph , S. M. (San Francisco). 'Fetish, sign and symbol through the looking-glass: a Jungian critique of Jacques Lacan's Ecrits'. San Francisco Jung Institute Library Journal
L edermann , R. (Brighton). 'Narcissistic disorder: ajungian view of the etiology and treatment'. Brit.J. Psychotherapy
S amuels , A. (London). 'Countertransference, the mundus imaginalis, and a research project'. Jahrboek van de interdisciplinaire vereniging voor analytische psychologie
S amuels , A. (London). 'Oltre il principio femminile: un punto di vista post-junghiano' (Beyond the feminine principle: a post-Jungian point of view). L'Immaginale
S amuels , A. (London). 'Sesso, genere e psiche: un punto di vista postjunghiano' (Sex, gender and psyche: a post-Jungian point of view), in Presenza ed eredità culturale di C. G. Jung
S idoli , M. (London). 'The myth of Cain and Abel and its roots in infancy'. British Journal of Psychotherapy
S idoli , M. (London). 'Vergogna e ombra' (Shame and the shadow). Rivista di psicologia analitica
S iegelman , E llen Y. (Los Angeles). 'The Tower as Artifact and Symbol in Jung and Yeats'. Psychological Perspectives
S teinberg , W arren . 'Idealisation: A Clinical Discrimination. Quadrant     

Fixing forensic patients: Psychiatric recommendations for treatment in pretrial settings

This article is concerned with psychiatric recommendations for treatment at the Metropolitan Toronto Forensic Service (METFORS), a clinical assessment agency providing both 1-day and 30-day evaluations of criminal defendants in Toronto, Canada. Analysis of both psychiatric reports and quantitative research instruments demonstrated the saliency of treatment as a central forensic issue at METFORS. Among a sample of 592 defendants, 134 were considered in need of outpatient care. Persons recommended for hospitalization were most likely to exhibit histories of mental health rather than criminal justice contacts; to be arrested for nonviolent offenses; to manifest psychotic behavior while at METFORS; to be found unfit for bail, incompetent to stand trial, in need of further assessment and dangerous to self; and to experience higher rates of hospitalization, but lower levels of criminalization during the two years following their initial forensic assessment. Psychiatric reports at METFORS tended to merge recommendations for treatment and assessment; to suggest prison or probation as means for securing clinical treatment; and to provide little written support for judgments about the need for intervention. Along with competency and dangerousness, treatment is a key issue in forensic practice, and warrants further attention in the psycholegal literature.     

Treatment recommendations for mentally disordered offenders: More than roulette?

Clinical judgments on the treatability and prognosis of mentally disordered offeenders (MDO) may strongly influence legal dispositions and the availability of treatment resources. This study examined 1,238 discharge summaries for MDOs referred for court assessments. Psychiatrists evidenced marked variability in how often they recommended treatment and how frequently they judged patients to have a poor prognosis. Two logit analyses suggested that diagnosis and consultation by other clinicians were associated with (a) treatment recommendations (i.e., Axis I diagnosis and social work consultations) and (b) prognosis (i.e., Axis II diagnosis and psychology consultations).     

Procedural Justice and Culture

The past fifteen years have seen the development of a considerable research literature on the social psychology of procedural justice (see Lind & Tyler, 1988, for a review). Procedural justice research reveals some serious shortcomings in the exchange theories that have traditionally dominated Western analyses of the social psychology of groups, and in so doing, the procedural justice literature has important ramifications for cross-cultural psychology. Results from a number of studies conducted in the United States and Western Europe show that individualistic, self-interest based models of human behaviour are insufficient to explain procedural justice phenomena. Instead, procedural justice effects frequently reveal strong group-oriented concerns and motivations even in cultural contexts generally thought to be characterized by individualistic orientations. The research literature also shows that if a group's procedures are judged to be fair, people are more likely to show group-oriented behaviour and to hold more favourable attitudes toward the group and its leaders. These findings have led to the development of a theory of justice judgments—the Lind and Tyler group-value theory—which is based on group norms and relations rather than on social exchange theory. We describe a general model of social behaviour that integrates group- and individually-oriented behaviour, and we discuss the implications of the model for social and cross-cultural psychology.