全文获取类型
收费全文 | 150篇 |
免费 | 8篇 |
出版年
2022年 | 1篇 |
2021年 | 3篇 |
2020年 | 2篇 |
2019年 | 2篇 |
2018年 | 3篇 |
2017年 | 3篇 |
2016年 | 9篇 |
2015年 | 3篇 |
2014年 | 5篇 |
2013年 | 18篇 |
2012年 | 3篇 |
2011年 | 4篇 |
2010年 | 6篇 |
2009年 | 4篇 |
2008年 | 9篇 |
2007年 | 7篇 |
2006年 | 8篇 |
2005年 | 8篇 |
2004年 | 8篇 |
2003年 | 3篇 |
2002年 | 4篇 |
2001年 | 2篇 |
2000年 | 5篇 |
1999年 | 5篇 |
1998年 | 3篇 |
1997年 | 2篇 |
1996年 | 2篇 |
1995年 | 2篇 |
1993年 | 2篇 |
1992年 | 1篇 |
1991年 | 3篇 |
1989年 | 1篇 |
1988年 | 2篇 |
1986年 | 3篇 |
1984年 | 2篇 |
1982年 | 1篇 |
1979年 | 1篇 |
1977年 | 3篇 |
1975年 | 1篇 |
1974年 | 1篇 |
1972年 | 1篇 |
1971年 | 2篇 |
排序方式: 共有158条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
151.
Pastoral Psychology - 相似文献
152.
The question of whether pay structures should be compressed or dispersed remains unanswered. We argue that pay dispersion can yield uncertainty regarding others' intentions and behaviors; as a result, individuals take a greater risk trusting their group members as pay spreads widen. Accordingly, we explore the conditions under which individuals are more willing to take this risk by viewing their group members as trustworthy even when pay is dispersed. Specifically, preferences for how relationships and resources should be structured in groups should help to determine when pay dispersion relates to trustworthiness perceptions. We hypothesise that the cross‐level interaction between preferences for communal sharing (Level 1)—that is, the extent to which individuals prefer communal, egalitarian structures in their groups—and pay dispersion (Level 2) is associated with trust perceptions. Data drawn from a sample of university professors support our hypothesised cross‐level interaction, and show that when pay dispersion is greater, individuals perceive their group members as more trustworthy only when they have weak preferences for communal sharing. Our results signify the importance of individual attributes to understanding pay dispersion's effects, and show that trust is fostered when preferences and pay conditions are aligned. 相似文献
153.
154.
In writing Equal Citizenship and Public Reason, we aimed to show that political liberalism is a feminist liberalism. To that end, we develop and defend a particular understanding of the commitments of political liberalism. Then, we argue that certain laws and policies are needed to protect and secure the interests of persons as free and equal citizens. We focus on the laws and policies that we think are necessary for gender justice. In particular, we apply our view to the contexts of prostitution law, family and marriage law, state support for caregivers, and religious exemptions from generally applicable laws. In this article, we consider some of the challenges made by the thoughtful critics who are part of this symposium. In particular, we address: why the collective enterprise view of liberal democracy requires shared reasons for the justification of certain laws and policies; how we understand substantive equality and why our understanding of substantive equality does not commit us to a comprehensive doctrine; how we avoid defending a particular political conception of justice in showing that political liberalism is a feminist liberalism; and how it is that, given justice pluralism, public reasons can provide stability for the right reasons. 相似文献
155.
156.
157.
158.