首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   124篇
  免费   0篇
  124篇
  2024年   1篇
  2021年   1篇
  2020年   2篇
  2019年   4篇
  2018年   1篇
  2017年   7篇
  2016年   1篇
  2015年   7篇
  2014年   5篇
  2013年   15篇
  2012年   4篇
  2011年   3篇
  2010年   3篇
  2009年   8篇
  2008年   7篇
  2007年   5篇
  2006年   7篇
  2005年   3篇
  2004年   2篇
  2003年   6篇
  2002年   7篇
  2001年   1篇
  1999年   2篇
  1998年   1篇
  1997年   2篇
  1996年   1篇
  1995年   2篇
  1994年   3篇
  1992年   1篇
  1991年   3篇
  1990年   1篇
  1989年   2篇
  1988年   1篇
  1984年   2篇
  1983年   1篇
  1982年   1篇
  1980年   1篇
排序方式: 共有124条查询结果,搜索用时 0 毫秒
121.
This study tested the hypothesis that failure in active visuospatial working memory tasks involves a difficulty in avoiding intrusions due to information that is already activated. Two experiments are described, in which participants were required to process several series of locations on a 4 × 4 matrix and then to produce only the final location of each series. Results revealed a higher number of errors due to already activated locations (intrusions) compared with errors due to new locations (inventions). Moreover, when participants were required to pay extra attention to some irrelevant (non-final) locations by tapping on the table, intrusion errors increased. Results are discussed in terms of current models of working memory functioning.  相似文献   
122.
123.
As shown by neuroscientific evidence, neglect may occur without elementary sensorimotor impairments. The deficit is to be found at a higher, more abstract level of representation, which prevents the patient not only from seeing, but from conceiving the contralesional space. By analysing a series of neuropsychological results, in this paper we suggest a crucial role of time for the construction of a world: on this basis, we try to explain how it is possible that half the ontology gets lost. The analysis of the ontological implication of neglect will allow us to shed light on manifestations of the pathology apparently disconnected.  相似文献   
124.
    
Cesare Cozzo; 《Theoria》2024,90(5):479-491
This is a dialogue between Lisa and Max on Dag Prawitz's work concerning the concept of deductive validity. Lisa first explains Prawitz's criticisms of the presently prevailing non-epistemic analyses of validity. Then Lisa describes three different ways in which Prawitz attempted to develop an epistemic concept of validity. Max asks questions for clarification, raises some objections and compares Prawitz's three approaches with other lines of thought. Two inference rules are specially discussed: disjunction introduction and ex contradictione quodlibet. Max and Lisa view Prawitz's contribution as part of a variegated, ongoing research pursuing an explication of the concept of validity, which began with the Socratic and Platonic distinction between merely persuasive arguments and good arguments and with Aristotle's definition of syllogism. Throughout the history of philosophy, logicians have aimed at clarifying a pre-theoretic idea of good deduction and have proposed, criticized, refined, adjusted precise theoretical concepts of validity. Prawitz has criticized current views about validity, has advanced new proposals and revised them. His work is an important chapter of the long pursuit of the concept of validity.  相似文献   
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号