Affectivity in Its Relation to Memory

It seems obvious that various feelings (various kinds of affectivity) are memorized, forgotten, and recollected to various degrees. Some of them are forgotten. Some of those forgotten can be recollected, while others are lost forever. For example, short and long-lasting feelings and shallow and deep feelings are memorized and remembered in different ways. In this paper I analyse from a conceptual point of view several categories of memory-of-feelings and offer a comprehensive map of them. In the end, the richness of categories in the realm of memory is interpreted as a proof of the intricacy of affectivity.     

Infants' reasoning about opaque and transparent occluders in an individuation task

Two experiments document that conceptual knowledge influences 3-year-olds' extension of novel words. In Experiment 1, when objects were described as having conceptual properties typical of artifacts, children extended novel labels for these objects on the basis of shape alone. When the very same objects were described as having conceptual properties typical of animate kinds, children extended novel labels for these objects on the basis of both shape and texture. Moreover, providing a salient perceptual cue (Experiment 2) did not interfere with children's reliance on conceptual information in extending novel words: when an object with eyes was labeled with a novel word in the context of a story describing the object as an artifact, children extended the label on the basis of shape alone (i.e. as though the object were an artifact). These results, which challenge directly the position that 'dumb attentional mechanisms' can account for word learning, stand as evidence for the central role of conceptual information in mapping words to meaning.     

Major alternatives to the Classic Experimental Design

In summary, giving up any of the three defining features of the Classic Experimental Design has (at least) two important effects. Each concession creates a significant threat to our confidence that any improvements observed were actually attributable to the treatment we are studying. At the same time, each concession opens a door by enhancing, sometimes greatly, the feasibility of conducting work in settings that are the most true to everyday clinical practice. When the work is thoughtfully and responsibly conducted, the alternative designs can contribute to clinical knowledge in a way that is equally important to the contributions made by work that conforms to the stringent requirements of the "Classic" design. In the next article, we will discuss single-time-point designs, along with the important dictum, memorized by most everyone who has taken a course called "Introduction to Research" or "Introduction to Statistics" that correlation is not causation.