首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   214篇
  免费   7篇
  2023年   2篇
  2021年   2篇
  2020年   5篇
  2019年   5篇
  2018年   3篇
  2017年   2篇
  2016年   4篇
  2015年   2篇
  2014年   6篇
  2013年   22篇
  2012年   12篇
  2011年   6篇
  2010年   5篇
  2009年   2篇
  2008年   11篇
  2007年   7篇
  2006年   9篇
  2005年   4篇
  2004年   11篇
  2003年   8篇
  2002年   5篇
  2001年   6篇
  2000年   8篇
  1999年   3篇
  1998年   5篇
  1997年   2篇
  1996年   2篇
  1995年   2篇
  1994年   4篇
  1992年   2篇
  1991年   2篇
  1990年   7篇
  1989年   2篇
  1987年   3篇
  1986年   5篇
  1984年   3篇
  1983年   3篇
  1982年   3篇
  1981年   2篇
  1980年   1篇
  1979年   1篇
  1976年   1篇
  1975年   1篇
  1974年   3篇
  1972年   3篇
  1971年   2篇
  1970年   3篇
  1969年   1篇
  1968年   3篇
  1964年   1篇
排序方式: 共有221条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
201.
It is important to consider the two parameters of signal detection theory, discriminability and response bias, when evaluating eyewitness identification from simultaneous lineups. On the basis of the diagnostic feature‐detection hypothesis, we tested a method for increasing discriminability that encourages eyewitnesses to carefully rank each lineup member based on match to their memory for a perpetrator. This procedure increased empirical discriminability and also eliminated a response bias that is largely overlooked in the literature: Participants were biased to choose from the top row of the six‐pack (2 × 3) lineup commonly used in the United States. We argue that suspect position in the simultaneous lineup is an important variable to consider for researchers and the criminal justice system. We also encourage researchers to test the ranking procedure to determine if such a simple set of instructions could be utilized by police to help eyewitnesses correctly sort innocent versus guilty suspects.  相似文献   
202.
Many recent computational models of verbal short-term memory postulate a separation between processes supporting memory for the identity of items and processes supporting memory for their serial order. Furthermore, some of these models assume that memory for serial order is supported by a timing signal. We report an attempt to find evidence for such a timing signal by comparing an “item probe” task, requiring memory for items, with a “list probe” task, requiring memory for serial order. Four experiments investigated effects of irrelevant speech, articulatory suppression, temporal grouping, and paced finger tapping on these two tasks. In Experiments 1 and 2, irrelevant speech and articulatory suppression had a greater detrimental effect on the list probe task than on the item probe task. Reaction time data indicated that the list probe task, but not the item probe task, induced serial rehearsal of items. Phonological similarity effects confirmed that both probe tasks induced phonological recoding of visual inputs. Experiment 3 showed that temporal grouping of items during list presentation improved performance on the list probe task more than on the item probe task. In Experiment 4, paced tapping had a greater detrimental effect on the list probe task than on the item probe task. However, there was no differential effect of whether tapping was to a simple or a complex rhythm. Overall, the data illustrate the utility of the item probe/list probe paradigm and provide support for models that assume memory for serial order and memory for items involve separate processes. Results are generally consistent with the timing-signal hypothesis but suggest further factors that need to be explored to distinguish it from other accounts.  相似文献   
203.
204.
205.
206.
207.
208.
209.
210.
Earlier results on climinating numerical objects from physical theories are extended to results on eliminating geometrical objects.  相似文献   
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号