Effect of heterogeneous solute distribution on the anomalous thermomechanical response of Cu–Ni alloy single crystals below 50 K

The anomalous temperature dependence of the critical resolved shear stress (CRSS) of Cu–Ni alloys observed below a certain temperature, T _o?=?50?K, has been accounted for by introducing a stress-concentration factor f(T)?=?[(T?′?+?T _o)/(T?′?+?T)] in the monotonic CRSS–T formulation of the kink-pair nucleation model of solid-solution hardening. The empirical constant T?′ is found to depend not only on the solute concentration, c, but also on the nature of the solute distribution in the host lattice. It is found that the solute distribution is random for c?≤?14 at.% Ni in the Cu lattice and for c?≤?20 at.% Cu in the Ni lattice, whereas some sort of local ordering occurs for all other values of solute concentration.     

早孕期诊断及其相关问题分析

早孕期诊断是早期诊断的一部分。将新方法应用于早孕期诊断时,应考虑其成本效益问题。早孕期咨询应注意孕妇的年龄特征、个体化诊断和社会伦理学问题,正确诠释诊断结果,让孕妇及其配偶共同参与诊断。     

Scientists in the Swamp: Narrowing the Language–Practice Gap in Community Psychology

As a confluence of unique values and activities, the collective practice of community psychology is difficult to characterize in a simple way. Increasingly, however, professional contexts are laden with pressure to define any practice—from library work to medical interventions—in the orderly, compact language of traditional science. This trend has historically been resisted in the field by those sensing a fundamental lack of fit between the fluid, emergent aspects of community psychological practice and the fixed, precise language of classic science. In response to this “language–practice gap,” some have attempted to adapt the traditional language of science to better fit the field's practice, while others have explored alternative languages of practice seemingly more indigenous to the messy “swamp” of actual communities. While the former effort leaves some theoretical contradictions intact, the latter tends to discount scientific identity entirely. This paper proposes a potential step forward by resituating questions of disciplinary language and identity within a current philosophical discourse where the nature of social science itself remains sharply contested. This suggests shifting attention away from “should we be a science?” to “what kind of science might we be after all?”; in turn, alternative languages may be re‐cast as legitimate contributors to a kind of science more authentic to human communities—even a viable “science in the swamp.” One such language–philosophical hermeneutics—is presented as a particularly valuable supplement to traditional science. Illustrations highlight ways that hermeneutics may advance the formal language of the field towards a closer fit of what actually happens in practice, while preserving and even bolstering the empirical rigor and scientific identity of the field.