排序方式: 共有16条查询结果,搜索用时 0 毫秒
11.
12.
We examined the differences between estimating the emotions of protagonists and evaluating those of readers in narrative comprehension. Half of the participants read stories and rated the emotional states of the protagonists, while the other half of the participants rated their own emotional states while reading the stories. The results showed that reading comprehension was facilitated when highly extraverted participants read stories about, and rated the emotional experiences of, extraverted protagonists, with personalities similar to their own. However, the same facilitative effect was not observed for less extraverted participants, nor was it observed for either type of participants under the condition in which participants rated their own emotional experiences. Thus, at least for highly extraverted participants, readers both facilitated the construction of a situation model and correctly estimated the emotional states of protagonists who were similar to themselves, perhaps due to empathy. 相似文献
13.
Our society is sustained by wide-ranging cooperation. If individuals are sensitive to others’ gains and losses as well as
the amount of labor, they can ensure future beneficial cooperative interaction. However, it is still an open question whether
nonhuman primates are sensitive to others’ labor. We asked this question in tufted capuchin monkeys in an experimental food-sharing
situation by comparing conditions with labor by two participants equalized (Equal labor condition) or unequalized (Unequal
labor condition). The operator monkey pulled the drawer of one of the two food containers placed between two monkeys, each
containing a food for him/herself and another for the recipient monkey. The recipient received either high- or low-value food
depending on the operator’s choice, whereas the operator obtained the same food regardless of his/her choice. In Unequal labor
condition, the operator first had to pull the handle of the board to which the containers were glued and then pull the drawer
of one of the containers, while the recipient received food with no labor. In Equal labor condition, the recipient had to
pull the handle of the board so that the operator could operate a container. Results showed that operators chose the high-value
food container for recipients more often than when the recipient was absent only in Equal labor condition. This suggests that
capuchin monkeys are sensitive to others’ labor and actively give food to a partner who has helped them to complete a task. 相似文献
14.
Richard M. Lee Linda Chalk Susan E. Conner Nancy Kawasaki Anthony Jannetti Tracy LaRue Emil Rodolfa 《Journal of multicultural counseling and development》1999,27(2):58-74
The current status of multicultural counseling training at university counseling center predoctoral internship sites was evaluated. Fifty training directors completed a mailed survey, and the results contribute to an understanding of graduate training programs. Training considerations and recommendations are discussed. 相似文献
15.
16.
The issue whether non-human primates have other-regarding preference and/or inequity aversion has been under debate. We investigated whether tufted capuchin monkeys are sensitive to others’ reward in various experimental food sharing settings. Two monkeys faced each other. The operator monkey chose one of two food containers placed between the participants, each containing a food item for him/herself and another for the recipient. The recipient passively received either high- or low-value food depending on the operator’s choice, whereas the operator obtained the same food regardless of his/her choice. The recipients were either the highest- or lowest-ranking member of the group, and the operators were middle-ranking. In Experiment 1, the operators chose the high-value food for the subordinate recipient more frequently than when there was no recipient, whereas they were indifferent in their choice for the dominant. This differentiated behavior could have been because the dominant recipient frequently ate the low-value food. In Experiment 2, we increased the difference in the value of the two food items so that both recipients would reject the low-value food. The results were the same as in Experiment 1. In Experiment 3, we placed an opaque screen in front of the recipient to examine effects of visual contact between the participants. The operators’ food choice generally shifted toward providing the low-value food for the recipient. These results suggest that capuchins are clearly sensitive to others’ reward and that they show other-regarding preference or a form of inequity aversion depending upon the recipients and the presence of visual contact. 相似文献