Self-Optimization of Walking in Nondisabled Children and Children With Spastic Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy

Children voluntarily adopt a frequency and movement pattern for walking. The force-driven harmonic oscillator (FDHO) model was used in this study for accurate prediction of the preferred walking frequency of nondisabled children and children with spastic hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Four potential optimality criteria with which the preferred walking pattern was forced to comply were examined: minimization of physiological costs, maximization of mechanical energy conservation, minimization of asymmetry in lower limb movements and minimization of variability of interlimb and intralimb coordination. Age and gender-matched nondisabled children (n = 6) and children with spastic hemiplegic cerebral palsy (n = 6) were tested under six frequency conditions of walking at a constant speed on a treadmill. For the nondisabled children, the results indicated that their preferred walking frequency could be accurately predicted by the FDHO model. They freely adopted a walking pattern that minimized physiological costs, asymmetry, and variability of inter- and intralimb coordination. For the children with spastic hemiplegic cerebral palsy, the prediction of preferred overground walking frequency required that the FDHO model be modified to account for muscle mass and leg length discrepancies between limbs and increased stiffness. Most of the children achieved the same optimality goals as the nondisabled when walking at the preferred frequency. However, the children were found to use different mechanisms to attain these goals: for example, a steeper increase observed in physiological cost at higher frequencies; a lowered center of gravity of the body, which allowed for angular symmetry; and greater variability of between-joint coordination in the nonaffected limb and less variability in the affected limb.     

The Timing Effects of Accent Production in Periodic Finger-Tapping Sequences

When subjects are required to produce short sequences of equally paced finger taps and to accentuate one of the taps, the interval preceding the forceful tap is shortened and the one that immediately follows the accent is lengthened. Assuming that the tapping movements are triggered by an internal clock, one explanation attributes the rnistiming of the taps to central factors: The momentary rate of the clock is accelerated or decelerated as a function of motor preparation to, respectively, increase or decrease the movement force. This hypothesis predicts that the interresponse intervals measured between either tap movement onsets or movement terminations (taps) will show the same timing pattern. A second explanation for the observed interval effects is that the tapping movements are triggered by a regular internal clock but the timing of the successive taps is altered because the forceful movement is completed in less time than the other tap movements are. This "peripheral" hypothesis predicts regular timing of movement onsets but distorted timing of movement terminations. In the present study, the trajectories of the movements performed by subjects were recorded and the interresponse intervals were measured at the beginning and the end of the tapping movements. The results of Experiment 1 showed that neither model can fully explain the interval effects: The fast forceful movements were initiated with an additional delay that took into account the small execution time of these movements. Experiment 2 reproduced this finding and showed that the timing of the onset and contact intervals did not evolve with the repetition of trial blocks. Therefore, the assumption of an internal clock that would trigger the successive movements must be rejected. The results are discussed in the framework of a modified two-stage model in which the internal clock, instead of triggering the tapping movements, provides target time points at which the movements have to produce their meaningful effects, that is, contacts with the response key. The timing distortions are likely to reflect both peripheral and central components.     

Resistance To Change As A Function Of Stimulus-reinforcer And Location-reinforcer Contingencies

Pigeons responded on two keys in each component of a multiple concurrent schedule. In one series of conditions the distribution of reinforcers between keys within one component was varied so as to produce changes in ratios of reinforcer totals for key locations when summed across components. In a second series, reinforcer allocation between components was varied so as to produce changes in ratios of reinforcer totals for components, summed across key locations. In each condition, resistance to change was assessed by presenting response-independent reinforcers during intercomponent blackouts and (for the first series) by extinction of responding on both keys in both components. Resistance to change for response totals within a component was always greater for the component with the larger total reinforcer rate. However, resistance to change for response totals at a key location was not a positive function of total reinforcement for pecking that key; indeed, relative resistance to extinction for the two locations showed a weak negative relation to ratios of reinforcer totals for key location. These results confirm the determination of resistance to change by stimulus—reinforcer contingencies.     

思维定势浅议

思维定势是指人们在思维过程中自觉或不自觉地形成的一种比较稳定的思维趋向．由于思维的惯性作用,人们往往频向于以原有的知识和经验去对待和衡量新的信息．思维定势的形成,主要是由一子思维的参照系数大小,思维主体长期接受同一信息的频繁刺激而造成的．思维定势在思维过程中有积极的一面,当思维主体原有的知识和经验与新信息相一致时,主体凭经验即可对事物作出正确的判断．但是当思维主体原有的知识和经验与新信息发生矛盾时,思维定势便呈现出消极影响。在这种情况下,由于思维主体总是趋向于用老经验老方法去解释新信息,而不愿意…     

创意就是财富

进入九十年代以来,美国一些著名的报刊,如《时代周刊》、《美国新闻与世界导报》、《成功）、《商业周刊》、《新闻周刊）等纷纷报道了在美国企业中悄然兴起的一项新的运动──创意训练,称这是美国企业在日趋复杂的竞争中寻求生存和发展的新手段．有人甚至断言,这将带来美国企业发展的一场革命,一个创意的时代即将来临。所谓创意,就是创新．任何一个管理者都清楚地知道：没有创新,就没有发展。现代企业掌握竞争优势的秘诀,不再仅是埋头苦干,抱守以往牵行的成功经典模式而已,而应当是求新求变,不断创新,企业需要新的创意以保持创…     

爱的逻辑

爱的逻辑常常不合逻辑,它总是拿规范意义上的逻辑开涮。例如,规范意义上的“打”与“骂”总是恶煞煞的．可民间却偏偏有一句描写爱情的话叫“打是亲骂是爱”,自然,仅此一句,也就道出了爱的逻辑的博大精深．那么．爱的逻辑何样？爱的逻辑玄奥无比：冬天和心爱的人在一起,你会不觉得冷！夏天和心爱的人在一起。你会不觉得热！“把你架在火上烤三分钟,您会觉得象烤了三年,可让你在心上人旁边坐三年,你会觉得才坐了三分钟！”爱的逻辑喜欢“自相矛盾”：陪你逛街的那个女孩子其实早就累了,可她却偏偏笑眯眯地问：“你累了吗？”爱你的…