排序方式: 共有3条查询结果,搜索用时 0 毫秒
1
1.
This article discusses the meta-analysis of raw mean differences. It presents a rationale for cumulating psychological effects in a raw metric and compares raw mean differences to standardized mean differences. Some limitations of standardization are noted, and statistical techniques for raw meta-analysis are described. These include a graphical device for decomposing effect sizes. Several illustrative data sets are analyzed. 相似文献
2.
Camille R. Patterson Joel B. Bennett Wyndy L. Wiitala 《Journal of business and psychology》2005,20(2):221-247
Workers can relax and unwind from stress through positive behaviors (e.g. exercise, meditation, reading) or substances (alcohol,
medication, drugs, or tobacco). This study explored unwinding and prevention training among small business workers (N = 539). Personal and workplace protective factors contributed to greater positive unwinding and less substance unwinding.
Employees were randomly assigned to one of two prevention trainings (Team Awareness-SB or Choices in Health Promotion) or a control group. Regression analyses indicated both trainings improved positive unwinding (compared to controls) beyond
the effects of protective factors. Positive unwinding is an important resource with potential relevance to small businesses.
This research was supported by Grant 1 UD1 SP-09416 from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. We
would like to thank Darlene Beard, Erin Kelly, Renee Lovett, Beth Mivedor, Stephani Mullins, Maria Rojas, Richard Sledz, and
Michael Shields for their help in conducting the study. We would also like to thank program partner, North Texas Small Business
Development Center (DCCCD) Region Director (State), Elizabeth M. Klimback Technology Assistance SBDC (DFWP) Director, Mr.
James E. Berish, MBA; 1402 Corinth Street, Dallas, TX 75215, +1-214-860-5709. A portion of this paper was presented at the
Society for Personality and Social Psychology 2004 Annual Meeting. 相似文献
3.
Michael Oliver Wiitala 《British Journal for the History of Philosophy》2013,21(4):649-666
Plotinus calls the first principle the One and the Good. According to Plotinus, ‘Good’ is an appropriate name for the One because the One is that which all things desire. Since he says that the One is beyond knowledge, beyond language, beyond intellect, and beyond being, however, what philosophical evidence can he provide for his claim that the One is that which all desire? In this article I offer some philosophical evidence, aside from mystical union with the One, for why ‘the Good’ is an appropriate name for the One, and for why calling the One ‘Good’ is not at odds with the fact that it is beyond knowledge, but rather entails it. To this end, after an initial consideration of the relationship between the good and desire in Plato and Aristotle, I focus on the role that desire plays in relation to the Good in Plotinus' thought. 相似文献
1