排序方式: 共有10条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1
1.
Hans-Johann Glock 《Philosophical Papers》2018,47(1):123-154
AbstractThe ever-increasing dominance of English within analytic philosophy is an aspect of linguistic globalisation. To assess it, I first address fundamental issues in the philosophy of language. Steering a middle course between linguistic universalism and linguistic relativism, I deny that some languages might be philosophically superior to others, notably by capturing the essential categories of reality. On this background I next consider both the pros and cons of the Anglicisation of (analytic) philosophy. I shall defend the value of English as a lingua franca, while denying both the feasibility and the desirability of English as the sole universal language of philosophy. Finally I turn to the linguistic inequality in contemporary analytic philosophy. While it does not per se amount to an injustice, there is a need to level the playing field. But the remedy does not lie in linguistic academic sectarianism. Instead, what might be called for are piecemeal measures to reduce explicit and implicit biases against analytic philosophers on the geographic fringes, biases that are only partly connected to the predominance of English. 相似文献
2.
3.
4.
Hans-Johann Glock 《Philosophia》2009,37(4):653-668
This paper considers the connection between concepts, conceptual schemes and grammar in Wittgenstein’s last writings. It lists
eight claims about concepts that one can garner from these writings. It then focuses on one of them, namely that there is
an important difference between conceptual and factual problems and investigations. That claim draws in its wake other claims,
all of them revolving around the idea of a conceptual scheme, what Wittgenstein calls a ‘grammar’. I explain why Wittgenstein’s
account does not fall prey to Davidson’s animadversions against the idea of a conceptual scheme as a force operating on a
pre-conceptual content. In the sequel I deny that the distinction between grammatical and empirical propositions disappears
in the last writings: it is neither deliberately abandoned, nor willy-nilly undermined by the admission of hinge propositions
in On Certainty or by the role accorded to agreement in judgement. 相似文献
5.
6.
Hans-Johann Glock 《Metaphilosophy》2004,35(4):419-444
Abstract: This article first surveys the established views on Wittgenstein's relation to analytic philosophy. Next it distinguishes among different ways of defining analytic philosophy—topical, doctrinal, methodological, stylistic, historical, and the idea that it is a family‐resemblance concept. It argues that while certain stylistic features are important, the historical and the family‐resemblance conceptions are the most auspicious, especially in combination. The answer to the title question is given in section 3. Contrary to currently popular “irrationalist” interpretations, Wittgenstein was an analytic philosopher in all phases of his career, albeit an exceedingly exotic one whose style transcends the limits of academic philosophy in general. On the historical understanding he qualifies because he was influenced by and in turn influenced mainly analytic philosophers. On the family‐resemblance conception he qualifies both because he developed and employed logico‐linguistic analysis and because he initiated the linguistic turn and the distinction between philosophy and science that characterizes one important strand in analytic philosophy. 相似文献
7.
8.
9.
Hans-Johann Glock 《Erkenntnis》1992,36(1):117-128
Conclusion v. Savigny's commentary is a remarkable achievement and essential reading for all scholars of the Investigations. It brings to the exegetical enterprise something new and important — the challenge of an immanent approach and the tool of German philology. However, some of the potential gains may be lost by his leitmotiv of a tight master-scheme. In my view this central theses scheme presses Wittgenstein's multifaceted masterpiece into an unsuitable Procrustean bed and tends to impoverish v. Savigny's account. Nevertheless there remains the palatable pattern-recipe (for me partly spoiled by an overdose of community-views). Most importantly, v. Savigny approaches most of the material in an innovative and illuminating way. He provides good reasons for questioning, although not necessarily overturning, many key claims of recent scholarship. 相似文献
10.
1