排序方式: 共有4条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1
1.
Gad Ibtissam Tan Xiao-Wei Cherie Williams Sarah Itawi Sally Dahbour Layth Rotter Zachary Mitro Graham Rusch Courtney Perkins Sara Ali Imran 《Journal of religion and health》2022,61(2):1120-1138
Journal of Religion and Health - According to many studies, addressing the religious and spiritual (R/S) needs of patient's increase patient satisfaction. One area of interest is how patient... 相似文献
2.
Omar Dahbour 《The Journal of Ethics》2005,9(1-2):201-224
Debates about global justice tend to assume normative models of global community without justifying them explicitly. These models are divided between those that advocate a borderless world and those that emphasize the self-sufficiency of smaller political communities. In the first case, there are conceptions of a community of trade and a community of law. In the second case, there are ideas of a community of nation-states and of a community of autonomous communities. The nation-state model, however, is not easily justified and is one that has been criticized extensively elsewhere. The model of a community of trade underlies both advocates of market-oriented development and exponents of global schemes of redistribution of resources and incomes. I analyze the work of Charles Beitz, Peter Singer, and Thomas Pogge to show that the assumption that global interdependence is beneficial is poorly justified. The model of a community of law, as seen in the work of Henry Shue and others, is the basis for arguments against state sovereignty and in favor of international human rights regimes. I argue that this model suffers either from a problem of practicability or of hegemony. Finally, the model of a community of autonomous communities uses notions of patriotism and sovereignty to maintain that disengagement and independence are the best routes to global peace and justice. 相似文献
3.
4.
1