共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 0 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
《Reviews in Religion & Theology》1998,5(1):86-87
John Ashton (ed), The Interpretation of John, T. & T. Clark C.F. Evans, The Lord's Prayer Colin E. Gunton, The Promise of Trinitarian Theology, T. & T. Clark John Parratt (ed), A Reader in African Christian Theology Eduard Schweizer, Jesus the Parable of God: What Do We Really Know About Jesus? T. & T. Clark Thomas F. Torrance, God and Rationality, T. & T. Clark 相似文献
4.
5.
6.
《Reviews in Religion & Theology》1995,2(4):104-105
Walter H. Capps, The N m Religious Right: Piety, Patriotism, and Politics Leory S. Rouner (ed.), Civil Religion and Political Theology Jane Schaberg, The lllegitimacy of Jesus: A Feminist Theological Interpretation of the Infancy Narratives Linwood Urban, A Short History of Christian Thought Robert Wuthnow, Christianity in the Twenty-First Century: Reflections on the Challenges Ahead 相似文献
7.
8.
9.
《Reviews in Religion & Theology》2006,13(1):136-142
Books reviewed:
A.J. Heschel (ed. and trans.), G. Tucker. Heavenly Torah as Refracted through the Generations. Reviewed by David R. Blumenthal
Robert Murray. Symbols of Church and Kingdom: A Study in Early Syriac Tradition. Reviewed by Augustine Casiday 相似文献
A.J. Heschel (ed. and trans.), G. Tucker. Heavenly Torah as Refracted through the Generations. Reviewed by David R. Blumenthal
Robert Murray. Symbols of Church and Kingdom: A Study in Early Syriac Tradition. Reviewed by Augustine Casiday 相似文献
10.
11.
《Reviews in Religion & Theology》2005,12(4):619-620
Book reviewed:
An Interpretation of Religion: Human Responses to the Transcendent , John Hick, Second Edition, Palgrave Macmillan 2004 (1-4039-4445-8), pp. xlii + 416, Pb £18.99 Reviewed by Michael A. Chester North East Oecumenical Course, Durham 相似文献
An Interpretation of Religion: Human Responses to the Transcendent , John Hick, Second Edition, Palgrave Macmillan 2004 (1-4039-4445-8), pp. xlii + 416, Pb £18.99 Reviewed by Michael A. Chester North East Oecumenical Course, Durham 相似文献
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
DAVID H. KELSEY 《Modern Theology》2009,25(2):315-327
Stanley Hauerwas and Gavin D'Costa develop theological arguments for inclusion of constructive theology in Universities' curricula; Andrew Shanks offers an equivalent. They share the conviction that the practice of theology cannot be separated from religious practices. Beyond that, however, their arguments scarcely intersect, in part because of differing analyses of the "secularity" that underwrites the academy's skepticism of theology as a "discipline." Hauerwas analyses secularity theologically; Shanks urges that even secular societies exhibit "will to Honesty" (think, perhaps, "ultimate concern") that is inherently religious and theological; D'Costa argues that central to secular liberalism is a commitment to genuine pluralism that ought to foster theologies in their particularities. 相似文献
17.
18.
19.
20.