共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 0 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
4.
Mario Gómez‐Torrente 《No?s (Detroit, Mich.)》2017,51(2):429-435
Nat Hansen builds a new argument for subjectivism about the semantics of color language, based on a potential kind of intersubjective disagreements about comparative color statements. In reply, I note that the disagreements of this kind are merely hypothetical, probably few if actual, and not evidently relevant as test cases for a semantic theory. Furthermore, even if they turned out to be actual and semantically relevant, they would be intuitively unusable by the subjectivist. 相似文献
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
12.
RUTH GINZBERG 《希帕蒂亚:女权主义哲学杂志》1990,5(1):178-180
This is a reply to Neal Jahren's “Comments” on my paper, “Uncovering Gynocentric Science,” which appeared in a 1987 issue of Hypatia 2 (3). 相似文献
13.
Jimmy R. Walker 《Journal of counseling and development : JCD》1986,64(10):662-662
14.
15.
TIMOTHY WILLIAMSON 《Philosophy and phenomenological research》2011,82(2):481-487
16.
TIMOTHY WILLIAMSON 《Philosophy and phenomenological research》2011,82(2):515-523
17.
RUTH GARRETT MILLIKAN 《Philosophy and phenomenological research》2007,75(3):682-691
18.
19.
20.
In our reply to Rowe, we explain why most of what he criticizes is actually the product of his misunderstanding our argument. We begin by showing that nearly all of his Part 1 misconceives our project by defending a position we never attacked. We then question why Rowe thinks the distinction we make between motivational and virtue intellectualism is unimportant before developing a defense of the consistency of our views about different desires. Next we turn to Rowe??s criticisms of our account of the prudential paradox and show these criticisms to rest on a misunderstanding. We close with some remarks about the implausibility and textual problems Rowe faces in denying that Socrates recognized a role for painful punishments. 相似文献