共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 0 毫秒
1.
2.
Maienschein J 《The American journal of bioethics : AJOB》2002,2(1):12-9, 30
In 2001, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the "Human Cloning Prohibition Act" and President Bush announced his decision to allow only limited research on existing stem cell lines but not on "embryos." In contrast, the U.K. has explicitly authorized "therapeutic cloning." Much more will be said about bioethical, legal, and social implications, but subtleties of the science and careful definitions of terms have received much less consideration. Legislators and reporters struggle to discuss "cloning," "pluripotency," "stem cells," and "embryos," and whether "adult" are preferable to "embryonic" stem cells as research subjects. They profess to abhor "copying humans" or "killing embryos." Do they know what they are talking about? Do we? This paper explores the historical, philosophical, and scientific contexts that inform this heated discussion. 相似文献
3.
4.
5.
6.
Gaoshan Zuo 《Frontiers of Philosophy in China》2007,2(2):280-290
War can be defined as organized political violence among two or more nations. In accordance with the purpose, processes and
results of war, the ethics of war generally comprises three aspects: right ethics, action ethics and duty ethics. The most
important issue in ethics of war is “justice”. “Justice” and “injustice” as a conceptual pair do not prescribe the objective
character of war but rather convey a subjective attitude and ethical position that have the potential to compel a populace
to either support or oppose a war.
Translated by Zuo Gaoshan and Xi Yunpeng from Lunlixue Yanjiu 伦理学研究 (Studies in Ethtics), 2005, (6): 43–48 相似文献
7.
8.
Y Gampel 《Psychoanalytic review》1988,75(4):499-509
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
Mark P. Jensen 《Sex roles》1987,17(5-6):253-267
The observation that men are usually more supportive of war than women had led several authors to suggest that masculinity plays a causal role in the decision to make war and stockpile nuclear arms. In order to examine the relationship between sex role orientation and attitudes towards war and nuclear weapons, gender and measures of sex role orientation were used to predict three attitudes about nuclear weapons and the use of military force. Two specific and two classes of hypotheses regarding the possible relationships among these variables were tested: masculinity, femininity, Masculinity × Femininity interaction, and Gender × Sex Role Orientation hypotheses. The results provided limited support only for the femininity hypothesis—that attitudes toward war are associated with feminine traits. However, neither masculinity nor femininity was found to be the only mediators of the gender/war attitude relationship, indicating that sex role orientation (and especially masculinity) should be given less emphasis when trying to explain the relationship between gender and attitudes toward war.The author gratefully acknowledges the helpful comments of Douglas Kenrick, Nancy Russo, and an anonymous reviewer on a earlier version of this paper. 相似文献
15.
Patrick Guinan 《Journal of religion and health》2002,41(4):305-309
The stem cell controversy raises a fundamental question for humankind. Does science have a right to pursue knowledge whatever the cost? Our Enlightenment culture says yes. However, human history and literature are sending warning signals. Ethical issues impact the “knowledge for its own sake” imperative, and must be addressed. 相似文献
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
Ted Peters 《Dialog》2019,58(1):39-53
Religious nationalism is dangerous, because it tends toward violence. In the case of America, religious nationalism is preceded by, and dependent upon, a covenant with God that renders judgment against the nation when it fails to embody divine justice. The second use of the law in Lutheran theology, combined with René Girard's scapegoat theory, provides the prophetic public theologian with a searchlight to make visible the nation's justification of violence. The haunting question becomes this: should the prophetic public theologian expose the lie on which American religious nationalism is built and risk sundering human community? 相似文献