走向神圣——对《现代语境中的上帝观念》的一种读解

20世纪以来伴随着现代到后现代的变化,人们进入了自启蒙运动所带来的自主性衍生的让人捉摸不定的神学困境。德国天主教神学家卡斯培所著的《现代语境中的上帝观念》关注的是在现代处境下如何看待上帝与信仰问题。面对世俗化的冲击,卡斯培一方面充分认识到现实社会发展本身及其所呈现的问题对神学提出了新的需求或挑战,但是另一方面他仍然强调神学性的神学(在基本教义与神学命题上要与传统相符合)。道成肉身的语言存在与爱成为卡斯培诠释上帝观念,走向神圣的可能性。     

Theologie Als Metatheorie

Ohne ZusammenfassungIn honor of Bishop Prof. Dr. H.-W. Heidland on the occasion of his 65th birthday.     

Der Graupapagei in der Gefangenschaft

Ohne Zusammenfassung     

Der Richtungsbegriff in der Psychologie

Ohne Zusammenfassung Mit 49 Textabbildungen     

Der Mensch in der Masse

Ohne ZusammenfassungPrivaat docent aan de Gemeente Universiteit van Amsterdam     

Der Analogiebegriff in der modernen Phyfik

Ohne Zusammenfassung     

Der biopsychosoziale Krankheitsbegriff in der Praxis

Many of the recent approaches in diagnostics and therapy, e. g. the behavioral medicine, consider themselves as “holistic” or “multidimensional”. By closer consideration, however, it turns out, that while more or less referring back to the system-theoretically founded “bio-psycho-social model” (Engel, Weiner et al.) its implications are not taken seriously in practice. Presenting a concrete work project (“simultaneous diagnostics”) we will show, how to implement this (theoretically potent) bio-psycho-social conception of disease in clinical practice. It can be clearly seen, that it cannot replace the conventional reductional approach of medicine which focusses on the examination of single processes and structures under simplified conditions. On the contrary, such reductionism remains indispensable, because to be able to grasp any higher (more complex) structure one has to know its elements. Comprehensive explanation of phenomena, however, is not possible in a reductionist way. Therefore, the bio-psycho-social disease model in its operationalization is not a new way of medicine, rather an expanded approach to diagnostical and therapeutic issues.     

Der gegenftand der pfychologie

Ohne Zusammenfassung     

Der Aufbau der Psychose

Ohne Zusammenfassung     

Der Rabe und der Bayesianist

The Raven and the Bayesian. As an essential benefit of their probabilistic account of confirmation, Bayesians state that it provides a twofold solution to the ravens paradox. It is supposed to show that (i) the paradox’s conclusion is tenable because a white shoe only negligibly confirms the hypothesis that all ravens are black, and (ii) the paradox’s first premise is false anyway because a black raven can speak against the hypothesis. I argue that both proposals are not only unable to solve the paradox, but also point to severe difficulties with Bayesianism. The former does not make the conclusion acceptable, and it entails the bizarre consequence that a great amount of non-black non-ravens substantially confirms the ravens hypothesis. The latter does not go far enough because there is a variant of the first premise which follows from Bayesianism and implies a weaker, but nevertheless untenable, variant of the conclusion.

---

Der Rabe und der Bayesianist

     

Der neuropathische Schmerz in der medizinischen Praxis

Patients with pain symptoms probably represent one of the most frequent treatment indications in clinical practice. This is regardless of medical specialty, as pain is interdisciplinary and occurs in all fields, and is thus also treatable and should be treated, as long as the pain is chronic, i.e. lasting for more than 3 up to a maximum of 6 months. The exception is purely organ-related or postoperative pain that is induced by an attributable previous incident. The pain as such, as long as it is not trauma- or surgery-induced, is invariably a neurological disease or a neurological symptom.     

Der Kern der materialistischen Dialektik

Ohne Zusammenfassung     

Der politische Begriff der Freiheit

Ohne Zusammenfassung