共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 46 毫秒
1.
Garrett Thomson 《Synthese》2008,162(3):373-384
Kolak’s arguments for the thesis ‘there is only one person’ in fact show that the subject-in-itself is not a countable entity.
The paper argues for this assertion by comparing Kolak’s concept of the subject with Kant’s notion of the transcendental unity
of apperception (TUAP), which is a formal feature of experience and not countable. It also argues the point by contrasting
both the subject and the TUAP with the notion of the individual human being or empirical self, which is the main concern standard
theories of personal identity such as those of Williams, Parfit and Nozick. Unlike the empirical self, but rather like Kant’s
TUAP, the subject-in-itself cannot be counted because it is not an object or substance, despite Kolak’s thesis that there
is only one. The paper also maintains that Kolak’s contention that the subject is an entity hinges on a strong and less plausible
interpretation of Kant’s transcendental idealism. 相似文献
2.
Jure Zovko 《Synthese》2008,162(3):425-438
In this article, I discuss the manner in which Dieter Henrich’s theory of subjectivity has emerged from the fundamental questions
of German Idealism, and in what manner and to what extent this theory effects a reinstatement of metaphysics. In so doing,
I shall argue that Henrich’s position represents a viable refutation of the attempt of the physicalist explanation of the
world to prove the concept of the subject to be superfluous. Henrich’s metaphysics of subjectivity is primarily focused on
the ‘ultimate questions’ which also compose “the deep levels of our subjectivity” and concern the factors that should promote
stability in our emotional, moral and intellectual life. I argue with Henrich that the indisputable facticity of our conscious
life is worthy of our special consideration and interpretation, explanation and clarification, just as the deeper meaning
(the individual and collective subconscious structure) hidden beneath the layers of apparent comprehensibility calls for urgent
investigation. Such interpretation and elucidation of life’s meaning has a tripartite character: first, it consists of clarification
of the totality of human experience together with the realities playing a part in it; second, it builds on the process by
which the contents of experience are cognized, and the knowledge thereof which results; thirdly, it embraces the transcendental
precondition enabling each and every one of us to consciously lead our lives—for life, in a human sense, does not merely happen to one. Henrich’s metaphysical foundation of subjectivity is
compared with Kolak‘s position, according to which individual consciousness is not insular, but integrated into the totality
of overall unity that some have called “the Universal Self”, “the Noumenal Self”. 相似文献
3.
Marya Schechtman 《Synthese》2008,162(3):405-423
In the spirit of the discussion in Daniel Kolak’s I Am You: The Metaphysical Foundation for Global Ethics, I consider the way in which divisions that we usually think of as borders between distinct people occur within a single
life. Starting with the dispute between constructionist and non-constructionist views of persons, I argue for a view that
places the unity of persons in the dynamic generated by simultaneously taking a constructionist and non-constructionist view
of oneself. In order to unify ourselves as agents we need to treat past and future selves as others, but to motivate this
endeavor we need to think of ourselves as temporally extended agents, and so identify with past and future selves. Understanding
this dynamic illuminates the structure of our agency and the unity of the self. 相似文献
4.
5.
Steven Crowell 《Synthese》2008,160(3):335-354
This paper argues that transcendental phenomenology (here represented by Edmund Husserl) can accommodate the main thesis of
semantic externalism, namely, that intentional content is not simply a matter of what is ‘in the head,’ but depends on how
the world is. I first introduce the semantic problem as an issue of how linguistic tokens or mental states can have ‘content’—that
is, how they can set up conditions of satisfaction or be responsive to norms such that they can succeed or fail at referring.
The standard representationalist view—which thinks of the problem in first-person terms—is contrasted with Brandom’s pragmatic
inferentialist approach, which adopts a third-person stance. The rest of the paper defends a phenomenological version of the
representationalist position (seeking to preserve its first-person stance) but offers a conception of representation that
does not identify it with an entity ‘in the head.’ The standard view of Husserl as a Cartesian internalist is undermined by
rejecting its fundamental assumption—that Husserl’s concept of the ‘noema’ is a mental entity—and by defending a concept of
‘phenomenological immanence’ that has a normative, rather than a psychological, structure. Finally, it is argued that phenomenological
immanence cannot be identified with ‘consciousness’ in Husserl’s sense, though consciousness is a necessary condition for
it. 相似文献
6.
Daniel Kolak 《Synthese》2008,162(3):341-372
Sydney Shoemaker leads today’s “neo-Lockean” liberation of persons from the conservative animalist charge of “neo-Aristotelians”
such as Eric Olson, according to whom persons are biological entities and who challenge all neo-Lockean views on grounds that
abstracting from strictly physical, or bodily, criteria plays fast and loose with our identities. There is a fundamental mistake
on both sides: a false dichotomy between bodily continuity versus psychological continuity theories of personal identity.
Neo-Lockeans, like everyone else today who relies on Locke’s analysis of personal identity, including Derek Parfit, have either
completely distorted or not understood Locke’s actual view. Shoemaker’s defense, which uses a “package deal” definition that
relies on internal relations of synchronic and diachronic unity and employs the Ramsey–Lewis account to define personal identity,
leaves far less room for psychological continuity views than for my own view, which, independently of its radical implications,
is that (a) consciousness makes personal identity, and (b) in consciousness alone personal identity consists—which happens to be also Locke’s actual view. Moreover, the ubiquitous Fregean conception of borders and the so-called “ambiguity
of is” collapse in the light of what Hintikka has called the “Frege trichotomy.” The Ramsey–Lewis account, due to the problematic
way Shoemaker tries to bind the variables, makes it impossible for the neo-Lockean ala Shoemaker to fulfill the uniqueness
clause required by all such Lewis style definitions; such attempts avoid circularity only at the expense of mistaking isomorphism
with identity. Contrary to what virtually all philosophers writing on the topic assume, fission does not destroy personal
identity. A proper analysis of public versus perspectival identification, derived using actual case studies from neuropsychiatry,
provides the scientific, mathematical and logical frameworks for a new theory of self-reference, wherein “consciousness,”
“self-consciousness,” and the “I,” can be precisely defined in terms of the subject and the subject-in-itself. 相似文献
7.
Tibor Solymosi 《Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences》2011,10(3):347-368
Recent work in neurophilosophy has either made reference to the work of John Dewey or independently developed positions similar
to it. I review these developments in order first to show that Dewey was indeed doing neurophilosophy well before the Churchlands
and others, thereby preceding many other mid-twentieth century European philosophers’ views on cognition to whom many present
day philosophers refer (e.g., Heidegger, Merleau-Ponty). I also show that Dewey’s work provides useful tools for evading or
overcoming many issues in contemporary neurophilosophy and philosophy of mind. In this introductory review, I distinguish
between three waves among neurophilosophers that revolve around the import of evolution and the degree of brain-centrism.
Throughout, I emphasize and elaborate upon Dewey’s dynamic view of mind and consciousness. I conclude by introducing the consciousness-as-cooking
metaphor as an alternative to both the consciousness-as-digestion and consciousness-as-dancing metaphors. Neurophilosophical
pragmatism—or neuropragmatism—recognizes the import of evolutionary and cognitive neurobiology for developing a science of
mind and consciousness. However, as the cooking metaphor illustrates, a science of mind and consciousness cannot rely on the
brain alone—just as explaining cooking entails more than understanding the gut—and therefore must establish continuity with
cultural activities and their respective fields of inquiry. Neuropragmatism advances a new and promising perspective on how
to reconcile the scientific and manifest images of humanity as well as how to reconstruct the relationship between science
and the humanities. 相似文献
8.
Itay Snir 《Continental Philosophy Review》2010,43(3):407-437
This article offers a new interpretation of Adorno’s “new categorical imperative”: it suggests that the new imperative is
an important element of Adorno’s moral philosophy and at the same time runs counter to some of its essential features. It
is suggested that Adorno’s moral philosophy leads to two aporiae, which create an impasse that the new categorical imperative
attempts to circumvent. The first aporia results from the tension between Adorno’s acknowledgement that praxis is an essential
part of moral philosophy, and his view according to which existing social conditions make it impossible for moral knowledge
to be translated into “right” action. The second aporia results from the tension between the uncompromising sensitivity to
suffering that underlies Adorno’s moral thought, and his analysis of the culture industry mechanisms which turn people into
happy, satisfied customers—an incompatibility which threatens to pull the rug out from under Adorno’s moral philosophy. My
interpretation of the “new categorical imperative” focuses on two characteristics it inherits from the “old,” Kantian one—self-evidence
and unconditionality—in order to present the new imperative as a response to these two aporiae. 相似文献
9.
Isabel Gois 《Philosophia》2010,38(1):143-156
Higher Order theories of consciousness have their fair share of sympathisers, but the arguments mustered in their support
are—to my mind—unduly persuasive. My aim in this paper is to show that Higher Order theories cannot accommodate the possibility
of misrepresentation without either falling into contradiction, or collapsing into a First-Order theory. If this diagnosis
is on the right track, then Higher Order theories—at least in the specific versions here considered—fail to give an account
of what they set out to explain: what is distinctive of ‘conscious’ phenomena. 相似文献
10.
We give psychological elaboration to some of Rayner’s (2011) ideas. For the idea of a space and boundaries within it many psychological explanations are possible. We elaborate the boundaries
as these occur in urban contexts as well as in the flow of irreversible time (between future and past). Shifting boundaries
or any act of transforming them leads to changes in the understanding of the whole. Boundaries within space and between different
fields—while having a physical existence—have also a symbolic component, which is specific to human beings. We reframe the
dynamic concept of boundaries along the lines of Bergson’s idea of durée, which allows us conceptualize boundaries between bodies and environments, as well as boundaries in the environment, as ever
transforming in spaces of ambiguity and, following Bakhtin, grotesque. This opens way for treating the boundary phenomena
as functionally emerging in person-environment—or, in von Uexküll’s terms, organism-Umwelt relation. Following Heidegger,
we conclude that through dynamic boundary-making we as species dwell in the world and make the world. 相似文献
11.
Chad Kidd 《Philosophical Studies》2011,152(3):361-383
In this paper, I argue against the claim recently defended by Josh Weisberg that a certain version of the self-representational
approach to phenomenal consciousness cannot avoid a set of problems that have plagued higher-order approaches. These problems
arise specifically for theories that allow for higher-order misrepresentation or—in the domain of self-representational theories—self-misrepresentation.
In response to Weisberg, I articulate a self-representational theory of phenomenal consciousness according to which it is
contingently impossible for self-representations tokened in the context of a conscious mental state to misrepresent their objects. This
contingent infallibility allows the theory to both acknowledge the (logical) possibility of self-misrepresentation and avoid
the problems of self-misrepresentation. Expanding further on Weisberg’s work, I consider and reveal the shortcomings of three
other self-representational models—put forward by Kreigel, Van Gulick, and Gennaro—in order to show that each indicates the
need for this sort of infallibility. I then argue that contingent infallibility is in principle acceptable on naturalistic grounds only if we attribute (1) a neo-Fregean kind of directly referring, indexical content to self-representational mental states and (2)
a certain ontological structure to the complex conscious mental states of which these indexical self-representations are
a part. In these sections I draw on ideas from the work of Perry and Kaplan to articulate the context-dependent semantic structure
of inner-representational states. 相似文献
12.
Christoph Kelp 《Erkenntnis》2012,76(1):115-120
This paper addresses the argument from ‘contextualist cases’—such as for instance DeRose’s Bank cases—to attributor contextualism.
It is argued that these cases do not make a decisive case against invariantism and that the debate between contextualists
and invariantists will have to be settled on broader theoretical grounds. 相似文献
13.
Thomas J. Nenon 《Continental Philosophy Review》2008,41(4):427-439
This article compares the differences between Kant’s and Husserl’s conceptions of the “transcendental.” It argues that, for
Kant, the term “transcendental” stands for what is otherwise called “metaphysical,” i.e. non-empirical knowledge. As opposed
to his predecessors, who had believed that such non-empirical knowledge was possible for meta-physical, i.e. transcendent
objects, Kant’s contribution was to show how there can be non-empirical (a priori) knowledge not about transcendent objects,
but about the necessary conditions for the experience of natural, non-transcendent objects. Hence the transcendental for Kant
ends up connoting a philosophy that claims to show how subjective forms of intuition and thinking have objective validity
for all objects as appearances. By contrast, Husserl’s phenomenological philosophy takes a different set of problems for its
starting point. His quest is to avoid the uncertainty of empirical knowledge about all kinds of objects that present themselves
to us as something other than, something transcendent to, consciousness. Transcendental or reliable knowledge is made possible
through the phenomenological reduction that focuses strictly on consciousness as immediately self-given to itself—reflection
upon “pure” consciousness. The contents of such consciousness are not the same for everyone and at every time, so they are
not necessary and invariant in the way that Kant’s pure forms of subjectivity are. Since Husserl however also claims that
the all objects, as intentional objects, are constituted in and for consciousness, an investigation into the structures of
pure subjectivity can also be called “transcendental” in a further sense of showing the genesis of our knowledge of objects
that are transcendent to consciousness. Moreover, since Husserl’s philosophical interest is precisely upon the structures
of that consciousness, he also concentrates on necessary conditions for the constitution of these objects in his philosophical
work. Hence, there ends up being a great deal of overlap between his own transcendental project and Kant’s in spite of the
differences in what each of them means by the term “transcendental.”
相似文献
Thomas J. NenonEmail: |
14.
The notion of ‘fluency’ is most often associated with spoken-language phenomena such as stuttering. The present article investigates
the relevance of considering fluency in writing. The basic argument for raising this question is empirical—it follows from
a focus on difficulties in written and spoken language as manifestations of different problems which should be investigated
separately on the basis of their symptoms. Key-logging instruments provide new possibilities for the study of writing. The
obvious use of this new technology is to study writing as it unfolds in real time, instead of focusing only on aspects of
the end product. A more sophisticated application is to exploit the key-logging instrument in order to test basic assumptions
of contemporary theories of spelling. The present study is a dictation task involving words and ‘non-words’, intended to investigate
spelling in nine-year-old pupils with regard to their mastery of the doubling of consonants in Norwegian. In this study, we
report on differences with regard to temporal measures between a group of strong writers and a group of poor ones. On the
basis of these pupils’ writing behavior, the relevance of the concept of ‘fluency’ in writing is highlighted. The interpretation
of the results questions basic assumptions of the cognitive hypothesis about spelling; the article concludes by hypothesizing
a different conception of spelling. 相似文献
15.
Dànielle DeVoss 《Sexuality & culture》2002,6(3):75-94
The historically significant but superficial divide between public and private spaces and identities has shaped women’s lives,
subjectivities, and sexualities. In this article, I analyze women’s self-sponsored and self-published porn sites. Specifically,
I focus on sites that demonstrate complex articulations of identity and subjectivity—sites that can be read as identity projects
that appropriate cultural expectations of sexuality.
To foreground this analysis, I first explore past work analyzing the public/private dichotomy and suggest that computers and
virtual spaces are used to reinforce the flimsy separation between public and private. Using these discussions as scaffolding,
I then read a selection of women’s porn sites, arguing that these women Web authors are inserting their embodied subjectivities
into public space, and forcing a remapping of the lines of the public and private in ways that rupture public representations
of sexuality.
‘Scarlet collar’ workers are the feminists of the modern age, say psychologists, free from coercion and the dangers of the
traditional, male dominated business. In the past two years they have moved away from traditional activities such as prostitution
and lap dancing to become the majority of cyberporn owners. —Cherry Norton, 2000, online
The woman’s duty, as a member of the commonwealth, is to assist in the ordering, in the comforting, and in the beautiful adornment
of the state. —J. Ruskin,Free and Ennobled, 1983, p. 291 相似文献
16.
Brinkmann has recently put forward an integrative theory of the mind by expanding Harré’s hybrid psychology. The theory is
integrative because it establishes that in order for one to gain a full understanding of the mind—which is represented as
a set of dispositions—one has to take into account theories about the brain, the body, social practices, and technological
artifacts. All of these are said to be ‘mediators’ upon which the mind depends. An important claim underlying the theory is
that in psychology the basic ontological unit is the person. We agree with Brinkmann both on this and on the dispositional
nature of the mind. Still, he does not make a strong case for the latter. Furthermore, we believe the concept of mediation
is by no means helpful to produce an integrative view in psychology, not only because the theoretical job of such a concept
is unclear but also because qua unifying concept it may end up undermining the ontological primacy of the person (in psychology).
In this paper we refer to these issues and suggest some ideas that may help improve Brinkmann’s (and Harré’s) proposal. 相似文献
17.
18.
Jytte Bang 《Integrative psychological & behavioral science》2009,43(4):374-392
In the paper I argue that the great impact of empiricism on psychology and the enclosed dualist agenda traps psychological
phenomena into subjectivism. By discussing the phenomena of nothingness in biological and cultural life it is argued that meaning must be considered as a phenomenon that represents both a fit and
a misfit of the individual with the environment. By stressing the overall presence of nothingness phenomena it is argued how
the reduced ontology of empiricism—and its blindness to relations and transformations out of which meaning grows—should be
overcome. In human cultural life, transformations are constitutive and ongoing changes are being produced to make sure that
continuity as well as discontinuity will happen. The analysis of especially one case—the removal of an Amish school after
a shooting episode—serves to prove how meaning grows out of cultural processes as people produce their own conditions of life.
From a cultural-ecological point of view, analyzing meaning at the level of individual phenomenology, hence, means analyzing
the ‘total psychological situation’ (legacy of Kurt Lewin). This may for instance include analyzing how people live, what
they consider important and worth preserving, what must be changed, what are their core values and how do institutional arrangements
contribute to keeping up that which is valued or to changing that which is not, etc. Meaning may be viewed the lived-out experience—the domain of self-generativity in human life. 相似文献
19.
Giampaolo Sasso 《Cognitive processing》2010,11(4):307-329
Drawing from Freud’s Project, the author proposes a model of cerebral development whose sensory–motor structure is defined by a frontal–occipital oscillatory
dynamic with a twofold function: the oscillation explains the formation and maintenance of mother–infant attunement in cerebral
growth, while, at the same time, also explaining the functioning of the projective–introjective dynamic at the basis of psychoanalytic
theory. The oscillatory dynamic, according to this perspective, operates as a “bridge” between two seminal theoretical models
of developments—the psychoanalytic and the infant research model—which, in turn, leads to the formulation of some neurological
hypotheses on how oscillation regulates the elaboration of maternal interaction in the infant’s brain, and how the mother
may act to modify it. The paper discusses how the oscillatory dynamic offers an innovative framework for the reconceptualization
of the development of mentalization, the function of mirror neurons, and, most interestingly, of the development of language,
explaining the non-verbal properties of ordinary linguistic communication and the function of oscillation in the regulation
of information exchange processing. 相似文献
20.
Iselin AM Mulvey EP Loughran TA Chung HL Schubert CA 《Journal of abnormal child psychology》2012,40(2):237-249
We examined antisocial adolescents’ perceptions of the importance of and their ability to accomplish positive life outcomes
(e.g., employment) and avoid negative ones (e.g., arrests) during their transition from adolescence to young adulthood. Participants
were 1,354 adolescents from the Pathways to Desistance project, a multisite longitudinal study of seriously antisocial adolescents.
Participants’ perceptions of the importance and likelihood of accomplishing positive adult goals at one age uniquely predicted
how often they engaged in behaviors that were consistent with these goals the following year. Our findings suggest that among
serious adolescent offenders aspirations to achieve positive goals are related to engaging in behaviors that bring adolescents’
current selves more in line with their aspired-to future selves. We discuss the implications of these findings for prevention
and intervention efforts. 相似文献