共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 0 毫秒
1.
Scott L. Pratt 《Studies in Philosophy and Education》1998,17(2-3):101-122
In an environment characterized by the emergence of new and diverse (and often opposed) philosophical efforts, there is a need for a conception of philosophy that will promote the exchange and critical consideration of divergent insights. Depending upon the operative conception, philosophical efforts can be viewed as significant, insightful and instructive, or unimportant, misguided and not real philosophy. This paper develops John Dewey's conception of philosophy as a mode of inquiry in contrast with Bertrand Russell's conception of philosophy as a mode of analysis. I argue that while Russell's analytic conception of philosophy justifies the dismissal of non-analytic philosophies, Dewey's conception of philosophy provides a theoretical framework for the comparison, evaluation and interaction of alternatives. 相似文献
2.
Neil Kennedy 《Journal of Philosophical Logic》2014,43(2-3):579-601
In this paper, I propose a solution to Fitch’s paradox that draws on ideas from Edgington (Mind 94:557–568, 1985), Rabinowicz and Segerberg (1994) and Kvanvig (Noûs 29:481–500, 1995). After examining the solution strategies of these authors, I will defend the view, initially proposed by Kvanvig, according to which the derivation of the paradox violates a crucial constraint on quantifier instantiation. The constraint states that non-rigid expressions cannot be substituted into modal positions. We will introduce a slightly modified syntax and semantics that will help underline this point. Furthermore, we will prove results about the consistency of verificationism and the principle of non-omniscience by model-theoretical means. Namely, we prove there exists a model of these principles, and delineate certain constraints they pose on a structure in which they are true. 相似文献
3.
4.
5.
6.
Philip W. Jackson 《Studies in Philosophy and Education》1990,10(4):337-344
This study seeks to examine Umberto Eco's views of the key ideas in John Dewey's Art as Experience. Eco's proferred suggestion of transactional psychology as a corrective to Dewey's views is criticized as a misreading of Dewey's position. 相似文献
7.
Philip W. Jackson 《Studies in Philosophy and Education》1991,10(4):337-344
This study seeks to examine Umberto Eco's views of the key ideas in John Dewey's Art as Experience. Eco's proferred suggestion of transactional psychology as a corrective to Dewey's views is criticized as a misreading of Dewey's position. 相似文献
8.
9.
10.
Eric Thomas Weber 《Human Studies》2008,31(4):361-382
In this paper I compare the roles that the explicit and implicit educational theories of John Dewey and John Rawls play in
their political works to show that Rawls’s approach is skeletal and inappropriate for defenders of democracy. I also uphold
Dewey’s belief that education is valuable in itself, not only derivatively, contra Rawls. Next, I address worries for any
educational theory concerning problems of distributive justice. Finally, I defend Dewey’s commitment to democracy as a consequence
of the demands of productive public inquiry and education.
相似文献
Eric Thomas WeberEmail: URL: http://www.olemiss.edu/~etweber |
11.
Peter Godfrey‐Smith 《No?s (Detroit, Mich.)》2016,50(1):73-89
An interpretation is given of John Dewey's views about “realism” in metaphysics, and of how these views relate to contemporary debates. Dewey rejected standard formulations of realism as a general metaphysical position, and interpreters have often been taken him to be sympathetic to some form of verificationism or constructivism. I argue that these interpretations are mistaken, as Dewey's unease with standard formulations of realism comes from his philosophical emphasis on intelligent control of events, by means of ordinary action. Because of his views about relations, Dewey's views in this area do risk collapsing into an overly holistic position. I discuss how these problems might be avoided, and consider also how Dewey's views about naturalism and realism might usefully inform ongoing work. 相似文献
12.
13.
Omar W. Nasim 《British Journal for the History of Philosophy》2013,21(6):1163-1182
What Russell regarded to be the ‘chief outcome’ of his 1914 Lowell Lectures at Harvard can only be fully appreciated, I argue, if one embeds the outcome back into the ‘classificatory problem’ that many at the time were heavily engaged in. The problem focused on the place and relationships between the newly formed or recently professionalized disciplines such as psychology, Erkenntnistheorie, physics, logic and philosophy. The prime metaphor used in discussions about the classificatory problem by British philosophers was a spatial one, with such motifs as ‘standpoints’, ‘place’ and ‘perspectives’ in the space of knowledge. In fact, Russell’s construction of a perspectival space of six-dimensions was meant precisely to be a timely solution to the widely discussed classificatory problem. 相似文献
14.
Despite the affirmation below from a chapter entitled “The Moral Self” in his Ethics (1932), Deweyseems not to have used the
term “moralself” outside that context. Perhaps he didn’t think it that crucial in his overall philosophy. I argue, on the
contrary, that the concept ofthe moralself is fundamental to Deweyan moral psychology and that it provides an illuminating
lens through which to view his philosophy of education. This paper explicates Dewey’s perspective on moral education as education
of the moral self. 相似文献
15.
16.
Lawrence Roberts 《Philosophia》1984,14(1-2):111-127
17.
18.
19.