共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 6 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Philip Clayton 《Zygon》2000,35(3):699-704
The author expresses appreciation to Professor Drees for his careful and mostly accurate reading of God and Contemporary Science. The exchange provides the opportunity to step back from the specifics of the debate and clarify what it is that gives rise to the increasing talk of panentheism within religion‐science discussions today. What is the central challenge that the natural sciences raise for theistic belief? How far does panentheism go toward answering this challenge, and what work still needs to be done? Locating the book in this way clarifies questions of where the burden of proof lies, especially with regard to the relation of physical, mental, and spiritual qualities. 相似文献
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
Cultural Authority in Comparative Context: A Multilevel Analysis of Trust in Science and Religion 下载免费PDF全文
Science and religion are among the most influential forces for organizing social life around the world, yet we know little about how national context shapes perceptions of them. Using data from the 2008 International Social Survey Program, we begin to fill this gap by investigating cross‐national differences in public attitudes about science, religion, and society. We find that exposure to science is associated with more trust in science relative to religion whereas religiosity is associated with less trust in science relative to religion. Moreover, these relationships are amplified in secular societies and in those where science is prioritized. We argue that secular and scientific societies provide a context in which personal characteristics are more influential in the formation of social attitudes. These results highlight the importance of macro‐level factors for shaping trust in science and religion and for understanding the sources of their influence in society more broadly. 相似文献
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
John Polkinghorne 《Zygon》2007,42(3):573-576