COHERENTISM AND JUSTIFIED INCONSISTENT BELIEFS: A SOLUTION

The most pressing difficulty coherentism faces is, I believe, the problem of justified inconsistent beliefs. In a nutshell, there are cases in which our beliefs appear to be both fully rational and justified, and yet the contents of the beliefs are inconsistent, often knowingly so. This fact contradicts the seemingly obvious idea that a minimal requirement for coherence is logical consistency. Here, I present a solution to one version of this problem.     

独粒钻石棋问题解决中的知觉搜索深度

本实验研究在不实施具体棋子移动的条件下,被试进行知觉搜索加工的能力。被试是40名具有解决独粒钻石棋问题近期经验的工科中专生。实验过程中被说不移动棋子,只对屏幕上呈现的棋盘上的棋子移动步骤进行心理表征。实验结果表明,在呈现问题初始状态与目标状态的情况下,被试有能力完成长达12步的棋子移动的知觉搜索加工深度(平均正确反应率>60％);平均反应时间随知觉搜索深度的增加而增加。     

THE JUSTIFIED SCOUNDREL: THE STRUCTURAL GENESIS OF CORRUPTION

"It's more important to look honest than it is to get anything done."
Municipal Agency Commissioner in New York City; Interview, 1991     

PERCEPTUAL PROCESS AND THE EBBINGHAUS ILLUSION

Perception is shown in a block diagram which includes the instrumental errors in the sensing device, the transmission distortion in the nerves and the perceptual misjudgment in the high center. The perceptual misjudgment originates from the variation of comparison standards and the method of comparison, and would correspond to the mis-programming of the computer. A general mathematical formula for perception under the influence of various background stimuli is presented. The mechanism and equation for predicting the Ebbinghaus illusion are also presented.     

感知负载对干扰效应和负启动效应的影响

保持刺激图形恒定,用改变任务难度的方法操纵负载的高低,研究了负载的变化对干扰效应及负启动效应的影响。实验结果显示在零负载时出现干扰效应,而高、低负载时干扰效应消失;同时在低、零负载时出现负启动效应,在高负载时负启动反转为正启动。这些结果说明负载的变化对干扰子的状态有明显的作用,但正启动效应的出现显示高负载并不能完全排除对干扰子的加工。     

UNDERDEVELOPMENT AND THE PROBLEM OF CAUSATION

Underdevelopment is the most controversial issue of our time. In a world which apparently exhibits so much power and yet does so little to drive it back, it represents the challenge par excellence. However, concerning this most pressing and controversial issue of underdevelopment, of all the disciplines which study man, philosophy is the one which until now said the least. At first sight, to mark off in the topic of underdevelopment an area of real philosophical concern does not seem feasible indeed. Underdevelopment understood as a mere failure of development appears to be within the competence of the disciplines of the social sciences, especially of economics, rather than that of philosophy. Viewed as a technical problem, it could thereby be declared outside the sphere of direct philosophical inquiry.
But this reason is no sooner accepted than it comes up against itself by the very nature of the conflicts in which the social sciences got bogged down in their attempt to understand underdevelopment. Although not directly spelt out, the conflicts are unmistakably pervaded throughout by philosophical questions. It suffices to point out the main cause of the theoretical split which divides scholars, in the general issue of tradition and modernity, to really bring out the eminently philosophical nature of the debate. We are obviously referring to the conflict between modernization theory and the neo-Marxist school. The purpose of this paper is precisely to show that the topic of underdevelopment, not only raises one of the basic and oldest problems of philosophy, namely the nature of the connection between the spiritual and the material, but also helps positively to reformulate it.