The effect of structure and degree of tilt on the tilted room illusion

The effect of structure and angle of tilt on the magnitude of the tilted-room illusion and its relationship to the illusion produced by a tilted-line field were examined in two experiments. In Experiment L, nine groups of 13 Ss were tested under three conditions of room tilt in the frontal plane (22.5, 45, and 67.5 deg) and under three conditions of structure (empty room, room with a back wall of stripes, and room with furniture). The results indicate that, while magnitude and direction of the illusion vary with degree of room tilt, structure increases the magnitude of the illusion only at a 45-deg room tilt. In Experiment 2, a field of lines was presented through a circular reduction tube to three groups of 13 Ss under three conditions of line tilt (22.5, 45, and 67.5 deg). An illusion occurred that was much smaller in magnitude and functionally different for the three tilt conditions when compared with the tilted-room illusion.     

The tonic immobility reaction in chickens: Response characteristics and methodology

A total of 379 chickens were run in five studies to assess the effect of different procedures on tonic immobility and to measure some of the response components of the reaction. The optimal period of manual restraint, by way of producing the most durable immobility response, was found to be 15 sec, and pretest holding conditions were shown to exert a significant influence on the reaction in naive birds. Birds who defecated during immobility or shortly after termination, remained immobile longer than comparable nondefecators. Duration of eye closure and latency of vocalization were also found to be good predictors of the duration of an immobility episode.     

Social facilitation in chickens: A different level of analysis

An assumption of the arousal (D × H) model of social facilitation effects is that in an otherwise constant stimulus situation the simple presence or absence of a conspecific has a quantitative influence on the D component, and that the habit hierarchy in the situation (H) is unaffected. However, certain evidence from avian subjects seemed inconsistent with the multiplicative effects predicted by the model, and experiments were conducted with the aim of resolving this discrepancy. In general, chickens were tested for consummatory responses in the company of companions, in isolation, or in the company of strangers. Clear findings emerged from these tests that showed that only the companion conditions were “facilitative”. Under the other test conditions there were qualitative (as opposed to merely quantitative) shifts in responses. Apparently, the different social test conditions evoked qualitatively different response hierarchies, and “facilitation” reflected this sort of shift rather than simple quantitative changes in arousal (D) across conditions. It was argued, therefore, that the appropriate level of analysis for facilitation effects for animals in a free response situation is not within the (D × H) envelope, but rather at the level of S (stimulus situation) in the S → (D × H) → R formulation. Implications for the analysis of social facilitation effects in humans were discussed.     

Construal‐level Mindsets Enhance Behavioral Persistence in Response to Incentive Valence

In this research, we find that incentive valence and construal‐level mindsets can interact to influence behavioral persistence on challenging tasks. An abstract mindset improves persistence in response to positively framed incentives whereas a concrete mindset improves persistence in response to negatively framed incentives. This interaction effect can be observed even when the cues inducing construal‐level mindsets are not related to the incentives or the incentivized tasks. Participants in our studies were either positively or negatively incentivized to solve a set of difficult anagrams, and were primed with an abstract or a concrete mindset using spatial (Study 1) and social (Study 2) cues. The participants persisted longer in response to the positively framed incentive when primed with spatially or socially remote cues. In contrast, for the negatively framed incentive, participants persisted longer when primed with spatially or socially proximal cues. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Response to Comment by Carere-Comes

Carere-Comas is concerned that I have elevated the client as a hero. I point out that what I really am arguing for is a paradigm shift from therapy as treatment to therapy as mutual, intelligent collaboration. I also discuss what it means to say that the client knows what he or she wants and needs. Finally I discuss the idea that it is the client who makes therapy happen.     

The role of movement in perceptual adaptation to a tilted retinal image

Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics - Perceptual adaptation to prismatically created tilt of the retinal image was measured after three conditions of exposure: active, passive and no...     

Response to Commentary by Gerald Schamess

No abstract available for this article.     

Response to Reviews by Sean Blenkinsop and Sean Sturm

Studies in Philosophy and Education -     

A Response to Responsibility of and Trust in ISPs by Raphael Cohen-Almagor

The Internet and Internet applications such as cloud computing continue to grow at an extraordinary rate, enabled by the Internet's open architecture and the vibrant lightly regulated Internet service provider (ISP) market. Proposals to hold ISPs responsible for content and software shared by their customers would dramatically constrain the openness and innovation that has been the hallmark of the Internet to date. Rather than taking the kind of approach favored by Raphael Cohen-Almagor, government should enlist the assistance of other intermediaries such as credit card companies in targeted actions against illegal activities online. In addition, they should foster improved online authentication, which could support “zones of trust” on the Internet.