2010-2014年心理学核心期刊载文的文献计量分析

采用文献计量学方法,以2010－2014年《心理学报》、《心理科学》、《心理科学进展》、《中国临床心理学杂志》、《心理与行为研究》、《心理发展与教育》、《心理学探新》刊载的5878篇文献为研究对象,对作者人数、研究机构、合作情况、研究内容、研究领域,研究对象、研究方法进行了分析,旨在对过去国内心理学的研究发展状况进行系统回顾与总结,并对将来研究提供参考。     

近五年来《心理学报》与《心理科学》文献计量比较研究

该研究采用文献计量学方法,以2005—2009年《心理学报》与《心理科学》的载文为研究对象,分别统计了两种期刊载文的研究领域、研究方法、载文体裁和作者特征等方面的数据信息。结果发现：基础领域是两种期刊心理学研究的主要领域;在应用领域方面两种期刊侧重点不同;两种期刊在研究方法的选择上是一致的,即实验法是心理学研究的主要研究方法,数据的搜集则主要靠测评法;两种期刊在心理学研究者的地区分布中都出现了明显的地区优势,优势地区与核心作者群略有不同。     

《心理科学进展》

《心理科学进展》(Advances in Psychological Science),月刊,中国科学院心理研究所主办,科学出版社出版,国内外公开发行。办刊宗旨是反映心理学各领域的最新研究进展。主要刊登能够反映国内外心理学各领域研究的新进展、新动向、新成果的文献综述和评论以及研究简报。《心理科学进展》被中国科学文献计量评价研究中心(中国科学院文献情报中心、中国社会科学院     

2007～2009年心理学核心期刊载文的文献计量分析*

采用文献计量学的方法,以2007至2009年《心理学报》、《心理科学》、《心理发展与教育》、《心理与行为研究》、《应用心理学》、《中国临床心理学杂志》刊载的2907篇学术论文为研究对象,统计在合作情况、研究机构、研究领域、研究内容、研究方法、统计方法等方面的情况。试图通过对各项统计结果的定量分析,描述我国心理学研究的发展现状,并分析未来发展的趋势。     

中国发展心理学的研究热点与发展趋势——基于《心理发展与教育》创刊35年的文献计量分析

为宏观地把握中国发展心理学的研究热点与发展趋势,基于我国唯一的发展心理学与教育心理学专业学术刊物《心理发展与教育》1985~2019年的2456篇文献,采用文献计量法对该刊年发文量、年被引量、年下载量、年转载量、研究机构、关键词等指标进行分析。结果发现,《心理发展与教育》历年的发文量总体呈波动上升的趋势,认知与社会性发展的研究为教育与学习心理以及心理健康的研究主题奠定了夯实的理论基础。结合关键词共现和聚类分析的结果,本文从发展时期、学科交叉和特殊群体三方面对我国发展心理学的未来发展趋势进行了展望。     

《心理技术与应用》简介

《心理技术与应用》杂志于2013年创刊(国内刊号CN10-1104/R,国际刊号ISSN 2095-5588,月刊),由民进中央主管,开明出版社和中央财经大学主办。本刊是一本应用心理学专业期刊,发表各应用心理学领域的前沿学术研究成果,尤其是运用心理学原理、方法和技术探讨经济、社会、管理、健康、教育等领域真实问题的原创性研究成果。     

《心理技术与应用》简介

《心理技术与应用》杂志于2013年创刊(国内刊号CN10-1104/R,国际刊号ISSN 2095-5588,月刊),由民进中央主管,开明出版社和中央财经大学主办。本刊是一本应用心理学专业期刊,发表各应用心理学领域的前沿学术研究成果,尤其是运用心理学原理、方法和技术探讨经济、社会、管理、健康、教育等领域真实问题的原创性研究成果。     

2002~2016年《心理学探新》载文的文献计量和知识图谱分析

采用Bicomb共词分析软件和spss22.0,对《心理学探新》2002~2016年间载文的基金、被引次数、下载量、作者、作者所在机构和关键词进行分析.结果表明,《心理学探新》近15年间共载文1313篇.载文数量总体呈现上升的趋势,并且,受到基金资助的载文数量逐年上升.核心作者为94位,占所有作者总数的4.99%.该杂志主要研究的机构为师范类院校.知识图谱分析发现该杂志的研究主题主要有3个方面.该杂志研究主题呈现多样化,但研究方法比较单一,未来需要探索新的方法,促进心理学更加科学全面地发展.     

近10年SCI人格心理学研究文献计量分析

本研究以美国科技信息研究所出版的《科学引文索引》（SCI）为数据源检索人格心理学文献,并从文献量、学科、国家、作者、期刊、引文等多角度进行文献计量分析。结果显示：人格心理学研究近10年进入了快速发展阶段,但论文数量与在高影响因子学术刊物中所占数量不相称;我国人格心理学研究在文献量等方面与国际先进水平比较有很大差距;人格与神经科学、精神机能障碍关系的研究是具有重要临床价值以及富有挑战性的研究重点。     

在认知框架下西方自然科学学与教的研究走向

Ｐｉｎｔｒｉｃｋ等 1 986年在美国《心理学年度评论》中所做的评述中指出 ,“心理学对于自然科学教学研究的最大影响莫过于认知心理学或信息加工心理学的影响。”认知革命使自然科学教育研究发生了巨大变化 ,呈现出蓬勃发展之势。1　各相关领域专家趋于合作研究　　依据各研究群体之间的关系 ,Ｌｉｎｎ等区分了自然科学教育研究发展的三个历史时期。第一个时期是分离 (ｓｅｐａｒａｔｉｏｎ)时期 ,大约从 1 870年到 1 950年。自然科学家设计教材 ,教师决定如何教自然科学 ,心理学家寻求学习的一般原理 ,而科学教育研究者描述学习与教学的结…     

Cultivating the field of psychology. Psychological journals at the turn of the century and beyond

Prominent psychologists, including G. Stanley Hall, James Mark Baldwin, and James McKeen Cattell, cultivated the field of psychological publishing with privately owned and managed journals. Hall's journals, including the American Journal of Psychology and Pedagogical Seminary, reflected his view of psychology as the empirical study of human nature and his support for applied psychology. Baldwin and Cattell's periodicals, including Psychological Review and Psychological Monographs, reflected a narrower scientific and academic view of psychology. Baldwin and Cattell were more successful editors than Hall and strategically linked their journals to the American Psychological Association (APA). The Psychological Review journals were purchased by APA in 1925. The narrower vision represented in these journals may have contributed to applied psychologists' dissatisfaction with APA during the late 1920s and early 1930s.     

Les programmes de l’Association for Psychological Science (APS) pour l’enseignement de la psychologie scientifique

The Association for Psychological Science (APS) supports the teaching of psychological science as a central part of its mission to promote, protect, and advance the interests of scientifically oriented psychology in research, application, teaching, and the improvement of human welfare. APS's teaching-related initiatives include: providing free classroom and educational use of research articles published in APS journals; a series of articles on presenting scientific findings in classroom lessons; sponsoring and hosting conferences on the teaching of psychological science, most notably hosting the popular Teaching Institute at the APS annual meeting and co-sponsoring the National Institute on the Teaching of Psychology (NITOP); providing grants for developing teaching resources; a Teaching fellowship; and providing financial and technical support to organizations that focus on teaching psychological science. Many of these activities are supported by the APS Fund for Teaching and Public Understanding of Psychological Science, established through an endowment from the David & Carol Myers Foundation. In addition, a core component of the APS Wikipedia Initiative is to involve students and teachers in the development of high-quality accurate information on concepts, findings and methods in psychological science.     

为我国心理科学的发展、繁荣和走向世界而奋斗

该文系作者在中国心理学会第稚届全国心理学学术大会上作的工作报告,总结了中国心理学会第六届理事会１９９３－１９９７年的工作,内容包括四个部分：１．积极开展心理学各分支学科的学术活动,促进我国心理科学巽;２．加强心理科学宣传,办好学术和科刊物,出版《中国心理科学》;３．加强与国际交往,我国心理科学开始走向世界;４．坚持民主办会原则,健全学会的组织机构,提高工作效率。     

Performance of british university psychology departments as measured by number of publications in BPS journals

The aim of this investigation was to gauge the comparative research performance of university departments of psychology in Britain. The performance indicator was the number of publications per departmental staff member in the journals of the British Psychological Society (BPS) during the seven-year period 1983–1989. The contents of these journals were thoroughly searched, and articles written by members of university psychology departments in Britain were counted. The number of publications of each psychology department was divided by the size of the department in the corresponding year and the resulting annual figures were summed to determine the number of publications in BPS journals per departmental staff member over the seven-year period. These research performance figures correlated significantly with an earlier measure of departmental research performance based on publications in the seven European psychological journals with the highest citations per published article and with recent performance indicators based on other criteria     

Performance of british university psychology departments as measured by number of publications in BPS journals

The aim of this investigation was to gauge the comparative research performance of university departments of psychology in Britain. The performance indicator was the number of publications per departmental staff member in the journals of the British Psychological Society (BPS) during the seven-year period 1983–1989. The contents of these journals were thoroughly searched, and articles written by members of university psychology departments in Britain were counted. The number of publications of each psychology department was divided by the size of the department in the corresponding year and the resulting annual figures were summed to determine the number of publications in BPS journals per departmental staff member over the seven-year period. These research performance figures correlated significantly with an earlier measure of departmental research performance based on publications in the seven European psychological journals with the highest citations per published article and with recent performance indicators based on other criteria     

为我国心理科学走向21世纪作出新的贡献

该文系作者在中国心理学会第八届代表大会上的报告 ,总结了中国心理学会第七届理事会 1997— 2 0 0 1年的工作。全文包括四个部分 :(1)开展学术交流 ,促进学科发展 ;(2 )传播心理科学知识 ,办好二个刊物 ;(3)加强国际交流 ,积极为 2 0 0 4年北京国际心理学大会作准备 ;(4)加强学会自身的建设 ,提高学会的影响力     

20年来我国心理学研究方法的回顾与反思

对近20年来我国心理学研究所采用的研究方法及分析资料的方法进行了客观的回顾与评价,概述了我国心理学研究所采用的主要研究方法和分析资料的方法,探索研究方法的变化趋势,指出存在的主要问题,并且为今后研究科学水平的提高提出建设性的意见。     

心理研究中统计方法应用的元分析——以《心理学报》《心理科学》(1998-2008)统计方法应用为例

统计方法在心理研究中得到了广泛的应用。统计方法的应用,除了具备一定的统计方法知识外,还应当了解统计方法应用的必要前提条件。通过调查、分析国内最具代表性的两种杂志《心理学报》、《心理科学》(1998 2008)应用了统计方法的论文(或报告),主要了解哪些统计方法得到最多的应用以及发现应用中存在的一些问题,并对此作了评述。目的是使心理学研究者在心理研究中能更好地应用统计方法分析问题,解决问题。     

Sex Biases in Subject Selection: A Survey of Articles Published in American Medical Journals

This study discusses the results of a survey of 1,800 articles published in American medical journals from 1985--1996. The study finds 9% of these articles reported research that uses only male subjects to examine medical conditions that affect both sexes; the ratio of research on female to male conditions among these articles was greater than 5:1; but 76.5% of the articles reported research that includes both male and female subjects. The study also discusses evidence that sex biases against women (and men) are decreasing. This study also offers some possible psychological, institutional, medical, and economic explanations of the sex biases in medical research published in American journals, and discusses some policy implications of sex biases in medical research. The study concludes by urging others to conduct more empirical research on sex biases in medical research.     

The psychology of diversity and its implications for workplace (in)equality: Looking back at the last decade and forward to the next

In this British Psychological Society (BPS) landmark paper, we employ an evidence synthesis approach to review the broad range of diversity research published in BPS journals between 2011 and 2021. By focusing on research that investigates stereotypes associated with, and discrimination towards, minority and minoritized groups, we seek to provide readers with a better understanding of the dynamics of a diverse workforce and, going forward, to facilitate the efforts of the psychology research community towards building a body of work that meaningfully addresses workplace inequalities. We thematically analyse and synthesize 25 articles, which fall into four interconnected themes: identity development and management; negative stereotypes, prejudice, and discrimination; working in a diverse team; and the broader organizational environment. Highlighting key strengths of this work and areas for future development, we note the absence of overarching theoretical debates and discussions that might facilitate the development of an on-going narrative across diversity-related research published within BPS journals. We outline a future research agenda to bridge methodological divides and to connect with diversity literatures in related disciplines such as human resource development (HRD), human resource management (HRM), and organization studies. In so doing, we advocate for psychologists to move beyond a solely individualistic perspective and instead recognize and account for the context within which diversity-related processes take place.