An Analysis of Co-Therapist Interaction in Group Psychotherapy

Practitioners are often faced with the decision about when to recommend individual or group treatment for clients. By reviewing the clinical and the research literature, this article examines the indications and the contraindications for group treatment. Results of the research literature review suggest that group treatment was more effective than individual treatment in 25 percent of the studies. Group treatment was also found to be more efficient than individual treatment in 31 percent of the studies reviewed. However, the research literature did not yield a clear pattern regarding the types of problems most effectively treated in groups. In contrast, the clinical literature does offer some valid and cogent guidelines which are described in the article.     

Group Psychotherapy in France

This article discusses group therapy as part of a multidisciplinary approach to the management of the various psychological and physical rehabilitation concerns posed by kidney and liver transplant candidates and recipients at Howard University Hospital in Washington, DC. The group's history, format, intervention foci, and roles of clinicians and patients attending the group are described and evaluated. Given the relative paucity of research literature in this area, the authors offer recommendations for empirical evaluation of the benefits of multidisciplinary group psychotherapy in ameliorating physical and emotional suffering and prolonging life among transplant patients.     

AIDS Group Psychotherapy

Abstract

Clinical data are presented from a day spent at a New Jersey high school severely impacted by the World Trade Center disaster. Dissociation, a sense of numbness, anger, and guilt about feelings induced by the tragedy are all common dynamics in adolescents responding to trauma. The developmental issues that adolescents are confronting are described and discussed in terms of the challenges they present to the healing process. An argument is made that using groups to aid in the long recovery process with our young people should be a top public health priority.     

An Introductory Course in Group Psychotherapy in The Netherlands: Use of a Knowledge-Sampling Test

Abstract

We offer comments regarding two articles in this issue, one titled “Bridging the Practitioner-Scientist Gap in Group Psychotherapy Research” and a complementary article providing the results of a survey, entitled “A Survey of Canadian Group Psychotherapist Association Members” Perceptions of Psychotherapy Research.’ We also make several recommendations for collaborative research between practitioners and scientists, such as the inclusion of clinicians on the research team, practice research networks, and improved approaches to communicating clinically relevant research findings. Also discussed are reflections and recommendations from the authors’ experience as scientist-practitioners.     

Practicum of Group Psychotherapy

Abstract

Many studies on therapeutic factors in group psychotherapy were done during the 1970s and 1980s, primarily with Western samples. The present study was carried out in a psychiatric inpatient clinic in Turkey. Using Yalom’s (1975) therapeutic factor questionnaire administered at discharge, patients rated existential factor, instillation of hope and self–understanding as the most helpful factors and identification as the least helpful. There were significant differences among patients with regard to gender, age, education, and comorbid personality disorder, but not with Axis I diagnosis or number of attended sessions. Patients’ and psychiatrist’s ratings showed significant differences. Differences between this Turkish sample and those reported in common Western literature are discussed under the light of relatedness psychology, which is an important concept of cross–cultural psychology.