共查询到17条相似文献,搜索用时 46 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
《孔子家语》可谓中国文化史上的“奇书”:若论其在中国思想与中国智慧中的价值,可以说罕有其匹;如论其在中国学术史上遭到的怀疑,亦堪称首当其冲。但是,近代以来出土的简帛文献证明,《孔子家语》确为先秦旧籍。鉴于《孔子家语》的内容、体量及相关学术问题,其价值绝不在“四书”之下,完全称得上“儒学第一书”或“孔子文化第一书”。《孔子家语》最为直接的价值,就是增加了数量庞大的可以利用的重要文献资料,以资印证校验《论语》等早期典籍文献的记载。在传统学术研究的方法论方面,《孔子家语》“伪书”案的终结,为中国历史文献研究方法提供了借鉴,也是对历代学者研究得失的一个很好检验。 相似文献
4.
从注疏入手是梳理《孔子家语》“伪书”说发生发展脉络的可行之路。唐代“三礼”注疏对《孔子家语》评价的高低取决于与郑玄《礼》学的契合程度,《毛诗正义》对《孔子家语》的评价与《诗》学内部的毛郑之争相关,这二者均是“疏不破注”的学术家法观念的反映。相比之下,“三礼”注疏与《毛诗正义》之外的唐人注疏对《孔子家语》秉承更为客观理性的态度。概言之,唐人注疏中对《孔子家语》的负面评价大部分是基于礼制问题而产生的。唐宋易代,礼学自身的关注视域发生变化,对《孔子家语》的关注焦点,从经典内部之歧说造成的礼制争议,转移到《礼记·中庸》的分篇上来。在此背景下,王柏正式提出《孔子家语》“伪书”说。 相似文献
5.
《孔子家语》或简称《家语》,是一部重要的儒家著作,记录了孔子及孔门弟子的思想言行.今本《孔子家语》作十卷,四十四篇,魏王肃注,附有王肃序和《后续》. 元马端临《文献通考·经籍考》引三国魏王肃注《孔子家语》所附汉孔安国后序说:"《孔子家语》者,皆当时公卿士大夫及七十二弟子之所咨访交相对问言语也. 相似文献
6.
《孔子家语》是一部记录孔子及其弟子言行的作品。从体裁的角度来看,《孔子家语》是一部以语录体为主的说理散文,同时又具有其他文体的某些特质。它与《论语》相比较具有向专论体过渡的倾向,从某些篇章来看它还兼有小说和家训色彩。 相似文献
7.
<孔子家语>应是一部很早就有了基本原型的书,并未经两汉官方意识形态的规整,因此其内容中的某些思想倾向与东汉官方意识形态不仅很疏离,而且其被王肃推上历史前台,恰是因为有反东汉官方意识形态且与汉魏之际思想解放潮流的几大主题如重人事轻天命、抑君申臣、反思礼情关系和教刑关系等相符的东西.这是王肃以<家语>为依据而非伪造<家语>... 相似文献
8.
<诗经·关雎>是孔子及早期儒家最重视的篇章之一,但西汉以来后儒所言<关雎>主旨却是说法纷纭.新出土的郭店楚简<孔子诗论>言<诗经·关雎>主旨是"改",即由"好色之愿"到"返纳于礼"的转变.孔子及早期儒家对<关雎>的重视,反映了孔子希望"正夫妇"之礼的愿望,以及要求人们"克己复礼"并重视婚姻家庭伦理教化的观念. 相似文献
9.
从《论语》看孔子对管仲的评价再探 总被引:2,自引:2,他引:0
《论语》中孔子关于管仲的评价或褒或贬,褒贬抵捂,令人费解。本文认为,孔子守道达变,他实际上是从道义和功利两个角度分别对管仲予以评价:一为以价值判断;一为用事实说话。 相似文献
10.
11.
12.
采用MBTI对中国和澳大利亚管理者人格类型的性别差异进行了比较研究.结果表明,在人格的维度、维度组合、类型上,澳大利亚管理者比中国管理者有更大的性别差异;而两国男性管理者在人格的维度、维度组合、类型上的差异比两国女性管理者的差异更大.研究同时发现,中国男、女管理者人格类型的分布都较集中,澳大利亚男、女管理者的人格类型分布都较均衡. 相似文献
13.
David A. Rosenbaum Chase J. Coelho Jewels D. Rhode Joseph P. Santamaria 《Journal of motor behavior》2013,45(3):187-194
A number of studies have demonstrated regularities in how individuals select and perform single object manipulations, but little work has been concerned with the manipulation of multiple objects. To this end, the authors asked participants to stack a set of linearly spaced containers onto various goal locations. Our aim was to determine whether participants adopted specific strategies to complete this task. We focused on whether the distance between the objects, the goal location of the objects, or both, determined the classes of movement sequences that individuals used to perform the task. The results showed that some individuals tended to use one hand for lifting and releasing the containers whereas other individuals tended to use both hands for lifting and releasing the containers. Those participants who tended to use one hand varied which hand was used according to the goal location of the containers but not the distance between containers. The emergence of these individual differences provides a new basis for inferring psychologically distinct classes of motor behavior. 相似文献
14.
15.
通过对203名大学生进行人际信任量表(ITS)和新版明尼苏达多相人格问卷(MMPI-2)的施测,从个体差异的角度来考察大学生信任倾向与各心理健康症状之间的关系。结果表明,MMPI-2临庆量表中的抑郁、精神衰弱、精神分裂症和社会内向性,内容量表中的焦虑、恐惧、强迫性、抑郁、怪异思维、愤怒、愤世嫉俗、反社会行为、A型行为、低自尊、社会不适、家庭问题、工作障碍、治疗反感,均与信任倾向呈负相关。此外,四类不同心理健康特征的被试在信任倾向上存在差异,适应良好型被试的信任倾向得分显著高于其他三类,适应不良型的信任倾向显著低于其他三类,精神敏感型和外向冲动型的信任倾向居中.且这两娄之间没有显薯差异。 相似文献
16.
17.
Individual Differences in Risky Decision Making: A Meta‐analysis of Sensation Seeking and Impulsivity with the Balloon Analogue Risk Task 下载免费PDF全文
To represent the state‐of‐the‐art in an effort to understand the relation between personality and risk taking, we selected a popular decision task with characteristics that parallel risk taking in the real world and two personality traits commonly believed to influence risk taking. A meta‐analysis is presented based on 22 studies of the Balloon Analogue Risk Task from which correlations with sensation seeking and impulsivity assessments could be obtained. Results calculated on a total of 2120 participants showed that effect size for the relation of sensation seeking with risk taking was in the small–moderate range ( = .14), whereas the effect size for impulsivity was just around the small effect size threshold ( = .10). Although we considered participants' demographics as moderators, we found only significantly larger effect sizes for the older adolescents and young adults compared with other ages. The findings of the present review supported the view that inconsistencies in personality–risk research were mostly due to random fluctuations of specific effect sizes, rather than to lack of theoretical ties or to measurement unreliability. It is also concluded that studies aimed at relating individual differences in personality to performance in experimental decision tasks need an appropriate sample size to achieve the power to produce significant results. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 相似文献