共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 46 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
1993年8月,新加坡广播局和中国中央电视台联合举办了首届国际华语大专辩论会──“狮城舌战”。8月25日晚,英国剑桥大学队(正方)和中国复旦大学队(反方),围绕《温饱是谈道德的必要条件》这个辩题,展开了唇枪舌剑的辩论。正方所持的立场是“温饱是谈道德的必要条件”,反方所持的立场是“温饱不是谈道德的必要条件”。正方先后给“温饱”、“道德”等下过一些定义:“温饱”是指“相对温饱”(意为不饥不寒就是温饱,不具备温饱条件,就意味着有冻饿之累);而道德是“大家都能实践的规范”,那只有圣人英雄才能做到的行为,不是道德… 相似文献
4.
秘书文字中每一段话、每一个句子都有妥不妥、好不好的问题,一般都涉及语法、修辞和逻辑。那些优秀的秘书文字,都是凭其无懈可击的逻辑力量征服读者,达到预期目的的,甚至能促使一国之君收回成命(如《谏逐客书》)。而比较逊色的秘书文字,常常会因其逻辑性差、逻辑错误多,不仅说服不了读者,而且因文害事,轻则给直接领导带来麻烦,影响任务的完成;重则引起混乱,造成严重后果。秘书文字中的逻辑谬误主要有: 1、概念不明确、划分不科学。例如: 相似文献
5.
政治行为,包括党政机关的各种职能行为,如领导行为、决策行为、组织行为、宣传行为,以及与政治生活有关的个人行为、群体行为等。正确有效的政治行为不是随意性行为,它必须按照一定的逻辑规则,严格规范自己的行为。因而,考察分析政治行为中的逻辑谬误,对党政机关按照一定的逻辑规则严格规范自己的行为,对建立公正求实的廉洁政府,对强化人民群众的参政意识和规范自己的参政行为有重要作用。一、政治行为中的“逻辑矛盾”政治行为中出现“逻辑矛盾”,就会犯自相矛盾的行为错误。 相似文献
6.
逻辑是关于思维的科学,是寻求真理的工具。但是,正确的思维只有同谬误的思维相比照,才有实际意义,才能显示出它在认识中的作用和价值。因此,谬误研究应为逻辑研究的一个重要方面。在汉语中,“谬误”可泛指一般的错误、差错;也可用作与真理相对的反义词,指与客观现实不一致的认识。作为逻辑术语,“谬误”有广狭二义。广义的谬误,指在思维议论过程中发生的各种错误,包括思维形式上完全违反形式逻辑的错误,言词上与形式逻辑有关的错误,以及实质的即关于事实或内容的错误。狭义的谬误,指貌似正确的错误推理,亦即违反形式逻辑规律、规则而产生的错误。中国古代逻辑中的谬误论,讨论广义的逻辑谬误。 相似文献
7.
8.
9.
怀疑论者通常不愿与迷信的人交流,因为与他们的对话容易让人产生挫折感。迷信超自然的人惯用荒谬的语言和逻辑来挑战现有的科学知识以建构自己的立论。然而积极的怀疑论者不应该选择消极的逃避,而是应该勇敢直面这种挫折感,将自己所信奉的理性探究的伟大事业进行到底。你可能经常遇到这样的情况,比如,你参加一个聚会或者社会活动,悠哉游哉地喝着饮料,聊着感兴趣的话题。突然,就有人不识趣地将话题转移到了伪科学方面,你可能如坐针毡。但是,如果偏偏有人“哪壶水不开提哪壶”,问起你有什么高见,你也许会手足无措。为什么会这样呢?我想倒不是… 相似文献
10.
11.
Zed Adams 《Philosophical Investigations》2011,34(1):1-21
Is it possible to show that a moral claim is mistaken without taking a moral stand with regard to it? A striking number of contemporary metaethicists suppose that it is. In this paper, I argue against a prominent line of support for this supposition. My goal is to cast suspicion on a general tendency to think that the epistemic standing of moral claims is something that can be assessed from outside the practices of making and critically evaluating moral judgements. I do this by focusing on a widely accepted criterion of competence with regard to the use of moral concepts, the moral supervenience criterion (MSC). This criterion holds that someone who judges two acts or events to be morally different without thinking that he has to identify some non‐particular non‐moral difference between them simply doesn't understand what it is to make a moral judgement. I focus on a paradigmatic example of the sort of mistake in moral judgement that is supposed to support the MSC and argue that it provides no support whatsoever. I then offer my own alternative explanation of this sort of mistake in moral judgement. I conclude with a discussion of why advocates of the MSC are inclined to suppose that it is possible to assess the epistemic standing of a moral claim without oneself taking a moral stand with regard to it. 相似文献
12.
13.
Parental Discipline Mistakes 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
Susan C. O'Leary 《Current directions in psychological science》1995,4(1):11-13
14.
15.
16.
《Women & Therapy》2013,36(3-4):195-209
This article explores the cultural consequences of disability on women. The author interviewed four women with disabilities and two mothers and shares some of her own experiences with disability. The relationship between disability rights and feminism and ethnic identity and the impact of disability on the sense of self and personal goals are considered, as is the transformative power of speaking to the larger culture about how disability experiences inform human perceptions and social practices. 相似文献
17.
Linguistic factors in reasoning 总被引:3,自引:0,他引:3
J. St. B. T. Evans 《Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)》1977,29(2):297-306
An experiment is reported which attempts to demonstrate the effects of manipulating two linguistic variables on a propositional reasoning task, one relating to the linguistic form of the logical rule, and the other to the presence and absence of negative components. The results are discussed in relation to Evans' (1972a) distinction between interpretational and operational factors in reasoning. Problems arising from the application of this distinction are discussed in detail. 相似文献
18.
19.
20.
汪能平 《医学与哲学(人文社会医学版)》2007,28(4):5-6,24
就常见的临床诊疗决策失误,从四个方面探讨失误的原因。首先是对患者的发病过程的相关情况掌握不全面、不准确:其次是对患者的化验与检查结果用于诊断与治疗不尽合理:第三是未处理好对患者的诊断与治疗之间的相互关系:第四是未处理好如何发挥各级各类专家的智慧、学识与经验,用于整个临床诊断与治疗的决策过程。总而言之,影响临床决策的环节多,且贯穿于整个临床过程,医师们应重视循证医学证据,始终都要把握好,不可稍有粗疏,否则将不利于提升医疗质量,难以确保医疗安全。 相似文献