Hypothesis Formulation,Model Interpretation,and Model Equivalence: Implications of a Mereological Causal Interpretation of Structural Equation Models

One can distinguish statistical models used in causal modeling from the causal interpretations that align them with substantive hypotheses. Causal modeling typically assumes an efficient causal interpretation of the statistical model. Causal modeling can also make use of mereological causal interpretations in which the state of the parts determines the state of the whole. This interpretation shares several properties with efficient causal interpretations but also differs in terms of other important properties. The availability of alternative causal interpretations of the same statistical models has implications for hypothesis specification, research design, causal inference, data analysis, and the interpretation of research results.     

潜变量交互效应模型标准化估计中的检验问题

讨论了潜变量交互效应模型是否能直接用统计软件输出的原始估计的t值对模型的标准化估计进行检验的问题,详细介绍了标准化估计的t值计算及其难点,用Bootstrap方法算出标准化估计的标准误和相应的t值（记为t_bs）,并将其与原始估计的t值比较.结果发现,当原始估计t值超过3时,无论用t值还是用t_ bs检验,结果都是显著,即可以使用t值进行检验.而当t值不超过3时,与t_bs很接近,也可以用t值检验,但t值在临界值附近（例如1.5 ～2.5）时,最好还是使用Bootstrap法计算t_bs进行检验.     

结构方程模型常用拟合指数检验的实质

拟合指数检验是评价结构方程模型(SEM)的重要环节。从协方差结构分析的角度将SEM与传统的回归模型比较,容易理解为什么SEM需要拟合指数。揭示了目前几种流行的拟合指数检验的实质:基于卡方的绝对拟合指数(如RMSEA)检验的实质是重新设定卡方检验的显著性水平(不同于通常的.05),相对拟合指数(如NNFI和CFI)检验的实质是基于虚模型设定均方(卡方与自由度之比)降低到的比例;在NNFI大于临界值后,报告和检验CFI是不必要的。根据研究结果提出了一些方便实用的拟合检验建议。     

Exploring Factor Model Parameters across Continuous Variables with Local Structural Equation Models

Using an empirical data set, we investigated variation in factor model parameters across a continuous moderator variable and demonstrated three modeling approaches: multiple-group mean and covariance structure (MGMCS) analyses, local structural equation modeling (LSEM), and moderated factor analysis (MFA). We focused on how to study variation in factor model parameters as a function of continuous variables such as age, socioeconomic status, ability levels, acculturation, and so forth. Specifically, we formalized the LSEM approach in detail as compared with previous work and investigated its statistical properties with an analytical derivation and a simulation study. We also provide code for the easy implementation of LSEM. The illustration of methods was based on cross-sectional cognitive ability data from individuals ranging in age from 4 to 23 years. Variations in factor loadings across age were examined with regard to the age differentiation hypothesis. LSEM and MFA converged with respect to the conclusions. When there was a broad age range within groups and varying relations between the indicator variables and the common factor across age, MGMCS produced distorted parameter estimates. We discuss the pros of LSEM compared with MFA and recommend using the two tools as complementary approaches for investigating moderation in factor model parameters.     

Equivalent Structural Equation Models and Group Equality Constraints

This article is concerned with equivalent structural equation models that have been extended to multigroup models. It is shown that imposing cross-group equality constraints upon (a) no parameters or all parameters, or (b) any number of parameters in which the models are identical, preserves the model equivalence property. Alternatively, constraining for equality across groups some of those parameters in which the models differ can yield nonequivalent multiple-group models. The results are illustrated on two-group cognitive intervention data.     

On Insensitivity of the Chi-Square Model Test to Nonlinear Misspecification in Structural Equation Models

In this paper, we show that for some structural equation models (SEM), the classical chi-square goodness-of-fit test is unable to detect the presence of nonlinear terms in the model. As an example, we consider a regression model with latent variables and interactions terms. Not only the model test has zero power against that type of misspecifications, but even the theoretical (chi-square) distribution of the test is not distorted when severe interaction term misspecification is present in the postulated model. We explain this phenomenon by exploiting results on asymptotic robustness in structural equation models. The importance of this paper is to warn against the conclusion that if a proposed linear model fits the data well according to the chi-quare goodness-of-fit test, then the underlying model is linear indeed; it will be shown that the underlying model may, in fact, be severely nonlinear. In addition, the present paper shows that such insensitivity to nonlinear terms is only a particular instance of a more general problem, namely, the incapacity of the classical chi-square goodness-of-fit test to detect deviations from zero correlation among exogenous regressors (either being them observable, or latent) when the structural part of the model is just saturated.     

The Specific Analysis of Structural Equation Models

Conventional structural equation modeling fits a covariance structure implied by the equations of the model. This treatment of the model often gives misleading results because overall goodness of fit tests do not focus on the specific constraints implied by the model. An alternative treatment arising from Pearl's directed acyclic graph theory checks identifiability and lists and tests the implied constraints. This approach is complete for Markov models, but has remained incomplete for models with correlated disturbances. Some new algebraic results overcome the limitations of DAG theory and give a specific form of structural equation analysis that checks identifiability, tests the implied constraints, equation by equation, and gives consistent estimators of the parameters in closed form from the equations. At present the method is limited to recursive models subject to exclusion conditions. With further work, specific structural equation modeling may yield a complete alternative to the present, rather unsatisfactory, global covariance structure analysis.     

On Structural Equation Model Equivalence

A necessary and sufficient condition for equivalence of structural equation models is presented. Compared to existing rules for equivalent model generation (Stelzl, 1986; Lee & Hershberger, 1990; Hershberger, 1994), it is applicable to a more general class including models with parameter restrictions and models that may or may not fulfil assumptions of the rules, to show that two models are nonequivalent, or to nonidentified models. The validity of the replacement rule by Lee and Hershberger, Stelzl's rules, and Hershberger's inverse indicator rule is implied from the present method. Its application for studying model equivalence or lack thereof is demonstrated on a series of empirical examples.     

Pairwise Likelihood Ratio Tests and Model Selection Criteria for Structural Equation Models with Ordinal Variables

Correlated multivariate ordinal data can be analysed with structural equation models. Parameter estimation has been tackled in the literature using limited-information methods including three-stage least squares and pseudo-likelihood estimation methods such as pairwise maximum likelihood estimation. In this paper, two likelihood ratio test statistics and their asymptotic distributions are derived for testing overall goodness-of-fit and nested models, respectively, under the estimation framework of pairwise maximum likelihood estimation. Simulation results show a satisfactory performance of type I error and power for the proposed test statistics and also suggest that the performance of the proposed test statistics is similar to that of the test statistics derived under the three-stage diagonally weighted and unweighted least squares. Furthermore, the corresponding, under the pairwise framework, model selection criteria, AIC and BIC, show satisfactory results in selecting the right model in our simulation examples. The derivation of the likelihood ratio test statistics and model selection criteria under the pairwise framework together with pairwise estimation provide a flexible framework for fitting and testing structural equation models for ordinal as well as for other types of data. The test statistics derived and the model selection criteria are used on data on ‘trust in the police’ selected from the 2010 European Social Survey. The proposed test statistics and the model selection criteria have been implemented in the R package lavaan.     

Moment Testing for Interaction Terms in Structural Equation Modeling

Starting with Kenny and Judd (Psychol. Bull. 96:201–210, 1984) several methods have been introduced for analyzing models with interaction terms. In all these methods more information from the data than just means and covariances is required. In this paper we also use more than just first- and second-order moments; however, we are aiming to adding just a selection of the third-order moments. The key issue in this paper is to develop theoretical results that will allow practitioners to evaluate the strength of different third-order moments in assessing interaction terms of the model. To select the third-order moments, we propose to be guided by the power of the goodness-of-fit test of a model with no interactions, which varies with each selection of third-order moments. A theorem is presented that relates the power of the usual goodness-of-fit test of the model with the power of a moment test for the significance of third-order moments; the latter has the advantage that it can be computed without fitting a model. The main conclusion is that the selection of third-order moments can be based on the power of a moment test, thus assessing the relevance in the analysis of different sets of third-order moments can be computationally simple. The paper gives an illustration of the method and argues for the need of refraining from adding into the analysis an excess of higher-order moments.     

Abstract: Parameter Influence In Structural Equation Models

In applications of SEM, investigators obtain and interpret parameter estimates that are computed so as to produce optimal model fit in the sense that the obtained model fit would deteriorate to some degree if any of those estimates were changed. This property raises a question: to what extent would model fit deteriorate if parameter estimates were changed? And which parameters have the greatest influence on model fit? This is the idea of parameter influence. The present paper will cover two approaches to quantifying parameter influence. Both are based on the principle of likelihood displacement (LD), which quantifies influence as the discrepancy between the likelihood under the original model and the likelihood under the model in which a minor perturbation is imposed (Cook, 1986 Cook, R. D. 1986. Assessment of local influence. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological)., 48: 133–169. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]). One existing approach for quantifying parameter influence is a vector approach (Lee &; Wang, 1996 Lee, S-Y. and Wang, S. J. 1996. Sensitivity analysis of structural equation models. Psychometrika, 61: 93–108. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) that determines a vector in the parameter space such that altering parameter values simultaneously in this direction will cause maximum change in LD. We propose a new approach, called influence mapping for single parameters, that determines the change in model fit under perturbation of a single parameter holding other parameter estimates constant. An influential parameter is defined as one that produces large change in model fit under minor perturbation. Figure 1 illustrates results from this procedure for three different parameters in an empirical application. Flatter curves represent less influential parameters. Practical implications of the results are discussed. The relationship with statistical power in structural equation models is also discussed.

Abstract: Parameter Influence In Structural Equation Models

All authors

Taehun Lee &; Robert MacCallum

https://doi.org/10.1080/00273170802640491

Published online:

19 December 2008

FIGURE 1 Influence mapping for single parameters.     

13.

Bayesian Semiparametric Structural Equation Models with Latent Variables     

Mingan Yang  David B. Dunson 《Psychometrika》2010,75(4):675-693

Structural equation models (SEMs) with latent variables are widely useful for sparse covariance structure modeling and for inferring relationships among latent variables. Bayesian SEMs are appealing in allowing for the incorporation of prior information and in providing exact posterior distributions of unknowns, including the latent variables. In this article, we propose a broad class of semiparametric Bayesian SEMs, which allow mixed categorical and continuous manifest variables while also allowing the latent variables to have unknown distributions. In order to include typical identifiability restrictions on the latent variable distributions, we rely on centered Dirichlet process (CDP) and CDP mixture (CDPM) models. The CDP will induce a latent class model with an unknown number of classes, while the CDPM will induce a latent trait model with unknown densities for the latent traits. A simple and efficient Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm is developed for posterior computation, and the methods are illustrated using simulated examples, and several applications.     

14.

基于结构方程模型的多层中介效应分析     

方杰  温忠麟  张敏强  任皓 《心理科学进展》2014,22(3):530-539

近年社科领域常见使用多层线性模型进行多层中介研究。尽管多层线性模型区分了多层中介的组间和组内效应, 仍然存在抽样误差和测量误差。比较好的方法是, 将多层线性模型整合到结构方程模型中, 在多层结构方程模型框架下设置潜变量和多指标, 可有效校正抽样误差和测量误差、得到比较准确的中介效应值, 还能适用于更多种类的多层中介分析并提供模型的拟合指数。在介绍新方法后, 总结出一套多层中介的分析流程, 通过一个例子来演示如何用MPLUS软件进行多层中介分析。最后展望了多层结构方程和多层中介研究的拓展方向。     

15.

Predicting Health-related Quality of Life: Testing the Contextual Model Using Structural Equation Modeling     

Kimlin T. Ashing-Giwa  Jung-Won Lim 《Applied research in quality of life》2008,3(3):215-230

This study aims to investigate the utility of the Contextual Model of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) to explain the relationship among the domains of HRQOL with a diverse, population-based sample of breast cancer survivors (BCS). We employed a cross-sectional design to investigate HRQOL among 703 multiethnic, population-based BCS. The study methodology was guided by the Contextual Model of HRQOL. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) was conducted to assess the hypothesized model. SEM identified significant relationships among the bio-psychological domain (general health status, cancer-related factors, and psychological factors), the cultural-socio-ecological domain (health care satisfaction, socio-ecological factor, and socio-economic status), and HRQOL. The best fitting model indicates direct pathways from ‘general health status’, ‘years since diagnosis’, ‘health care satisfaction’ and ‘socio-ecological factor’ to ‘HRQOL’ variables. Additionally, ‘socio-ecological factor’ and ‘socio-economic status’ variables were indirectly associated with HRQOL through ‘general health status’. Findings suggest that the Contextual Model of HRQOL adds valid factors to explain overall HRQOL and increases our understanding of the socio-ecological dimensions predicting HRQOL outcomes. The revelation of inter-relations among the dimensions of HRQOL may inform the translational and clinical utility of the HRQOL construct.

Jung-Won Lim (Corresponding author)Email:

---

Dr. Kimlin T. Ashing-Giwa   is professor and director of the Center of Community Alliance for Research and Education (CCARE) at City of Hope. She received her doctorate in clinical psychology from the University of Colorado-Boulder. Her scholarship and life work is to understand and investigate how culture, ethnicity, ecological and systemic context influence health outcomes. Currently, she is developing and implementing community participatory interventions to reduce the risk and burden of chronic illness, in particular cancer. Dr. Jung-won Lim    is a research fellow of the CCARE at City of Hope. She received her doctorate from the University of Southern California, School of Social Work. Her research focuses on adjustment and quality of life among patients with chronic physical illness and their family. She is currently conducting studies related to health beliefs, health behaviors, and quality of life among breast cancer survivors.     

16.

管理胜任力特征分析:结构方程模型检验   总被引：171，自引：0，他引：171  

王重鸣  陈民科 《心理科学》2002,25(5):513-516

管理胜任力特征分析是人事选拔与评价的重要内容之一。本研究在运用基于胜任力的职位分析并总结国内外有关文献的基础上,编制了管理综合素质评价量表,并运用此量表调查了220名中高层管理者,采用因素分析和结构方程模型检验企业高级管理者胜任力特征的结构。结果表明,管理胜任力特征结构由管理素质和管理技能等两个维度构成,但在维度要素及其关键度上,职位层次间存在显著差异。本研究为管理职位的测评选拔提供了新的理论依据。     

17.

Frequentist Model Averaging in Structural Equation Modelling     

Jin  Shaobo  Ankargren  Sebastian 《Psychometrika》2019,84(1):84-104

     

18.

Sensitivity Analysis in Structural Equation Models: Cases and Their Influence     

Jolynn Pek  Robert C. MacCallum 《Multivariate behavioral research》2013,48(2):202-228

The detection of outliers and influential observations is routine practice in linear regression. Despite ongoing extensions and development of case diagnostics in structural equation models (SEM), their application has received limited attention and understanding in practice. The use of case diagnostics informs analysts of the uncertainty of model estimates under different subsets of the data and highlights unusual and important characteristics of certain cases. We present several measures of case influence applicable in SEM and illustrate their implementation, presentation, and interpretation with two empirical examples: (a) a common factor model on verbal and visual ability (Holzinger &; Swineford, 1939 Holzinger, K. and Swineford, F. 1939. A study in factor analysis: The stability of a bi-factor solution. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago..  [Google Scholar]) and (b) a general structural equation model assessing the effect of industrialization on democracy in a mediating model using country-level data (Bollen, 1989 Bollen, K. A. 1989. Structural equation models with latent variables New York, NY: Wiley.. [Crossref] , [Google Scholar]; Bollen &; Arminger, 1991 Bollen, K. A. and Arminger, G. 1991. Observational residuals in factor analysis and structural equation models. Sociological Methodology, 21: 235–262. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]). Throughout these examples, three issues are emphasized. First, cases may impact different aspects of results as identified by different measures of influence. Second, the important distinction between outliers and influential cases is highlighted. Third, the concept of good and bad cases is introduced—these are influential cases that improve/worsen overall model fit based on their presence in the sample. We conclude with a discussion on the utility of detecting influential cases in SEM and present recommendations for the use of measures of case influence.     

19.

结构方程模型中调节效应的标准化估计   总被引：7，自引：0，他引：7  

温忠麟  侯杰泰 《心理学报》2008,40(6):729-736

回归分析和结构方程分析中,标准化估计对解释模型和比较效应大小有重要作用。对于调节效应模型（或交互效应模型）,通常的标准化估计没有意义。虽然显变量的调节效应模型标准化估计问题已经解决,但潜变量的调节效应模型标准化估计问题复杂得多。本文先介绍回归分析中显变量调节效应模型的标准化估计,然后提出了一种通过参数的原始估计和通常标准化估计来计算潜变量调节效应模型的“标准化”估计的方法,得到的“标准化”估计是尺度不变的,说明可以用“标准化”估计来解释和比较主效应和调节效应     

20.

Structural Equation Models in a Redundancy Analysis Framework With Covariates     

Pietro Giorgio Lovaglio  Giorgio Vittadini 《Multivariate behavioral research》2013,48(5):486-501

A recent method to specify and fit structural equation modeling in the Redundancy Analysis framework based on so-called Extended Redundancy Analysis (ERA) has been proposed in the literature. In this approach, the relationships between the observed exogenous variables and the observed endogenous variables are moderated by the presence of unobservable composites, estimated as linear combinations of exogenous variables. However, in the presence of direct effects linking exogenous and endogenous variables, or concomitant indicators, the composite scores are estimated by ignoring the presence of the specified direct effects.

To fit structural equation models, we propose a new specification and estimation method, called Generalized Redundancy Analysis (GRA), allowing us to specify and fit a variety of relationships among composites, endogenous variables, and external covariates. The proposed methodology extends the ERA method, using a more suitable specification and estimation algorithm, by allowing for covariates that affect endogenous indicators indirectly through the composites and/or directly. To illustrate the advantages of GRA over ERA we propose a simulation study of small samples. Moreover, we propose an application aimed at estimating the impact of formal human capital on the initial earnings of graduates of an Italian university, utilizing a structural model consistent with well-established economic theory.     

Bayesian Semiparametric Structural Equation Models with Latent Variables

Structural equation models (SEMs) with latent variables are widely useful for sparse covariance structure modeling and for inferring relationships among latent variables. Bayesian SEMs are appealing in allowing for the incorporation of prior information and in providing exact posterior distributions of unknowns, including the latent variables. In this article, we propose a broad class of semiparametric Bayesian SEMs, which allow mixed categorical and continuous manifest variables while also allowing the latent variables to have unknown distributions. In order to include typical identifiability restrictions on the latent variable distributions, we rely on centered Dirichlet process (CDP) and CDP mixture (CDPM) models. The CDP will induce a latent class model with an unknown number of classes, while the CDPM will induce a latent trait model with unknown densities for the latent traits. A simple and efficient Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm is developed for posterior computation, and the methods are illustrated using simulated examples, and several applications.     

基于结构方程模型的多层中介效应分析

近年社科领域常见使用多层线性模型进行多层中介研究。尽管多层线性模型区分了多层中介的组间和组内效应, 仍然存在抽样误差和测量误差。比较好的方法是, 将多层线性模型整合到结构方程模型中, 在多层结构方程模型框架下设置潜变量和多指标, 可有效校正抽样误差和测量误差、得到比较准确的中介效应值, 还能适用于更多种类的多层中介分析并提供模型的拟合指数。在介绍新方法后, 总结出一套多层中介的分析流程, 通过一个例子来演示如何用MPLUS软件进行多层中介分析。最后展望了多层结构方程和多层中介研究的拓展方向。     

Predicting Health-related Quality of Life: Testing the Contextual Model Using Structural Equation Modeling

This study aims to investigate the utility of the Contextual Model of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) to explain the relationship among the domains of HRQOL with a diverse, population-based sample of breast cancer survivors (BCS). We employed a cross-sectional design to investigate HRQOL among 703 multiethnic, population-based BCS. The study methodology was guided by the Contextual Model of HRQOL. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) was conducted to assess the hypothesized model. SEM identified significant relationships among the bio-psychological domain (general health status, cancer-related factors, and psychological factors), the cultural-socio-ecological domain (health care satisfaction, socio-ecological factor, and socio-economic status), and HRQOL. The best fitting model indicates direct pathways from ‘general health status’, ‘years since diagnosis’, ‘health care satisfaction’ and ‘socio-ecological factor’ to ‘HRQOL’ variables. Additionally, ‘socio-ecological factor’ and ‘socio-economic status’ variables were indirectly associated with HRQOL through ‘general health status’. Findings suggest that the Contextual Model of HRQOL adds valid factors to explain overall HRQOL and increases our understanding of the socio-ecological dimensions predicting HRQOL outcomes. The revelation of inter-relations among the dimensions of HRQOL may inform the translational and clinical utility of the HRQOL construct.

管理胜任力特征分析:结构方程模型检验

管理胜任力特征分析是人事选拔与评价的重要内容之一。本研究在运用基于胜任力的职位分析并总结国内外有关文献的基础上,编制了管理综合素质评价量表,并运用此量表调查了220名中高层管理者,采用因素分析和结构方程模型检验企业高级管理者胜任力特征的结构。结果表明,管理胜任力特征结构由管理素质和管理技能等两个维度构成,但在维度要素及其关键度上,职位层次间存在显著差异。本研究为管理职位的测评选拔提供了新的理论依据。     

Sensitivity Analysis in Structural Equation Models: Cases and Their Influence

The detection of outliers and influential observations is routine practice in linear regression. Despite ongoing extensions and development of case diagnostics in structural equation models (SEM), their application has received limited attention and understanding in practice. The use of case diagnostics informs analysts of the uncertainty of model estimates under different subsets of the data and highlights unusual and important characteristics of certain cases. We present several measures of case influence applicable in SEM and illustrate their implementation, presentation, and interpretation with two empirical examples: (a) a common factor model on verbal and visual ability (Holzinger &; Swineford, 1939 Holzinger, K. and Swineford, F. 1939. A study in factor analysis: The stability of a bi-factor solution. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago..  [Google Scholar]) and (b) a general structural equation model assessing the effect of industrialization on democracy in a mediating model using country-level data (Bollen, 1989 Bollen, K. A. 1989. Structural equation models with latent variables New York, NY: Wiley.. [Crossref] , [Google Scholar]; Bollen &; Arminger, 1991 Bollen, K. A. and Arminger, G. 1991. Observational residuals in factor analysis and structural equation models. Sociological Methodology, 21: 235–262. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]). Throughout these examples, three issues are emphasized. First, cases may impact different aspects of results as identified by different measures of influence. Second, the important distinction between outliers and influential cases is highlighted. Third, the concept of good and bad cases is introduced—these are influential cases that improve/worsen overall model fit based on their presence in the sample. We conclude with a discussion on the utility of detecting influential cases in SEM and present recommendations for the use of measures of case influence.     

结构方程模型中调节效应的标准化估计

回归分析和结构方程分析中,标准化估计对解释模型和比较效应大小有重要作用。对于调节效应模型（或交互效应模型）,通常的标准化估计没有意义。虽然显变量的调节效应模型标准化估计问题已经解决,但潜变量的调节效应模型标准化估计问题复杂得多。本文先介绍回归分析中显变量调节效应模型的标准化估计,然后提出了一种通过参数的原始估计和通常标准化估计来计算潜变量调节效应模型的“标准化”估计的方法,得到的“标准化”估计是尺度不变的,说明可以用“标准化”估计来解释和比较主效应和调节效应     

Structural Equation Models in a Redundancy Analysis Framework With Covariates

A recent method to specify and fit structural equation modeling in the Redundancy Analysis framework based on so-called Extended Redundancy Analysis (ERA) has been proposed in the literature. In this approach, the relationships between the observed exogenous variables and the observed endogenous variables are moderated by the presence of unobservable composites, estimated as linear combinations of exogenous variables. However, in the presence of direct effects linking exogenous and endogenous variables, or concomitant indicators, the composite scores are estimated by ignoring the presence of the specified direct effects.

To fit structural equation models, we propose a new specification and estimation method, called Generalized Redundancy Analysis (GRA), allowing us to specify and fit a variety of relationships among composites, endogenous variables, and external covariates. The proposed methodology extends the ERA method, using a more suitable specification and estimation algorithm, by allowing for covariates that affect endogenous indicators indirectly through the composites and/or directly. To illustrate the advantages of GRA over ERA we propose a simulation study of small samples. Moreover, we propose an application aimed at estimating the impact of formal human capital on the initial earnings of graduates of an Italian university, utilizing a structural model consistent with well-established economic theory.