Modes and models in anxiety

Abstract

To examine within the realm of emotion the correspondences between personality models and classes of procedures for measuring individuality, a study was conducted in which self-rated anxiety, observations of anxious behaviors, and psychophysiological processes were recorded in multiple situations. Twenty-eight first-year psychology students participated in this study. For the specification of the basic concepts of personality a methodology is presented that is built on generalizability theory. Evidence is offered for a strong method-specificity of current personality models. Furthermore, the multimethod study revealed an absence of substantial multimode correlations.     

Test anxiety and visual vigilance

Twenty male and 20 female subjects, previously classified as high or low in test anxiety, participated in an experiment on visual vigilance under conditions designed either to enhance or minimize feelings of being tested. Detection rate declined across the 36 min of the task among subjects high in test anxiety who believed that they were being tested and in subjects low in test anxiety who did not. False detection rates revealed no significant differences among conditions. Analysis of sensitivity to signals according to statistical decision theory revealed low sensitivity in both the high-anxiety test and low-anxiety/no-test conditions than in the other two. Analysis of decisional criteria showed that subjects in the high-anxiety test condition were more conservative in setting a criterion than subjects in the other three conditions. No sex differences were found. The results are discussed in terms of an elaboration of Sarason's (1978) model of test anxiety.     

Test anxiety and reaction time for matching decisions

Subjects selected by test-anxiety level were presented pairs of words and asked to make judgments of physical identity, acoustic matching, or taxonomic category membership. Experiment 1 varied type of judgment between subjects; in Experiments 2 and 3, each subject made all three decisions. There was no consistent support for the hypothesis that, relative to low-anxiety subjects, high-anxiety subjects would show a more pronounced decrement in reaction times for semantic decisions than for nonsemantic decisions.