How not to become a Millian heir

The present article is a sequel to my previous manual, How to Become a Millian Heir, Nous, XXIII, 2 (April 1989), pp. 211–220. I thank my daughter, Simone Salmon, who provided almost constant discouragement while I worked on the current manual. It was delivered as a talk to the University of Padua conference on Propositions in May 1990. Further manuals are contemplated.     

In favour of a Millian proposal to reform biomedical research

One way to make philosophy of science more socially relevant is to attend to specific scientific practises that affect society to a great extent. One such practise is biomedical research. This paper looks at contemporary U.S. biomedical research in particular and argues that it suffers from important epistemic, moral and socio-economic failings. It then discusses and criticises existing approaches to improve on the status quo, most prominently by Thomas Pogge (a political philosopher), Joseph Stiglitz (a Nobel-prize winning economist) and James Robert Brown (a philosopher of science). Finally, it sketches an alternative proposal and argues for its superiority. The proposal has four components: changing the intellectual property regime; instituting independent clinical research; aligning innovators’ and patients’ interests; and enacting additional regulation.