Acquisition and maintenance of postshock response pattern in nondiscriminated avoidance with rats

Five experimentally naive albino rats were placed under a nondiscriminated lever-press avoidance schedule in which the delay to the next shock for responses after a shock was longer than the delay for responses after a response. Four rats acquired the postshock response pattern and maintained it for a prolonged period. The results revealed that postshock responding was under operant control and was not purely shock-elicited. It was suggested that the two kinds of response-shock interval, i.e. the shock-response-shock interval and the response-response-shock interval, could and should be independently controlled in nondiscriminated avoidance schedules.     

Conditioned inhibitory effects of discriminated Pavlovian training with food in rats depend on interactions of search modes,related repertoires,and response measures

Like other accounts of conditioned inhibition, behavior systems predicts (and Experiment 1 shows) that during summation and retardation tests, presentation of a negative conditioned stimulus (a CS-) created by discriminative Pavlovian food conditioning will interfere with a focal search response, such as nosing in the feeder. Unlike most other views, behavior systems predicts (and Experiment 2 shows) that the same CS- can potentiate a general search response, like attending to a moving artificial prey stimulus. Contacting the prey stimulus in extinction increased over baseline when a CS- but not a CS Novel preceded it. Experiment 3 showed this effect was not due to unconditioned qualities of the CS-. It appears that the effects of a discriminative CS- depend on the interaction of the training contingency with search modes related to the unconditioned stimulus (US), their perceptual-motor repertoires and environmental support, and the choice of response measure.     

Bar orientation in operant escape training

In operant escape training a rat is usually required to deflect a bar in a downward direction to terminate shock for a short interval of time. In the study described here, eight rats were conditioned with the bar mechanism modified to require a sideways deflection. The acquisition of escape responding with the bar in the modified position was inferior to the responding typically observed with the bar in the usual position. Sequences of successful escape responding were observed when the bar required a sideways deflection, but the response-reinforcement contingency was not adequate to maintain escape behavior.     

Stimulus learning versus response learning in a discriminated punishment situation

The suppression of bar pressing under two kinds of conditions was compared. Under one condition the response was occasionally punished by shock in the presence of a signal. Suppression to the signal was quickly acquired, indicating rapid learning about the signal-shock relationship (stimulus learning). Under the other condition the response was occasionally punished in the presence of the signal but additional free shocks were given in the absence of the signal. The slow acquisition of suppression found in this case indicated that there was, at best, only gradual learning about the response-shock relationship (response learning).     

Performance of rats on a discrimination operant alley task discriminated

An automated discriminated operant alley apparatus is described. Data from four rat strains indicate that the light-dark choice is learned by both pigmented and albino rats. The task requires a minimum of experimenter time and allows initial acquisition to be recorded without the interference of a shaping procedure.     

Contextual control of biconditional task performance: Evidence for cue and response competition in rats

A novel paradigm is presented that was designed to mimic aspects of cue and response competition seen in humans in conflict procedures such as the Stroop task. Rats were trained simultaneously on two biconditional discrimination tasks, one auditory and one visual, in two different contexts: C1, in which A1:LP1 → R, A2:LP2 → R; and C2, in which V1:LP1 → R, V2:LP2 → R, where C1/C2 represent different training contexts (produced by different operant chambers), A1/A2 are different auditory cues, V1/V2 are different visual cues, LP1/LP2 are discrete operant responses, and R is reward. At test, rats received presentations of audiovisual compounds of these training stimuli in extinction. These compounds had dictated either the same (A1V1 or A2V2) or different (A1V2 or A2V1) responses during training: termed congruent and incongruent trials, respectively. Experiment 1 showed that following equal training on the two biconditional tasks, the contextual cues came to control responding to conflicting information provided by incongruent stimulus compounds such that animals responded according to the stimulus element previously trained in that test context. Experiment 2 demonstrated that differential training on the biconditional discriminations (with rats receiving training on the two discriminations in the ratio 3∶1) resulted in greater interference from the overtrained task when animals were tested in the undertrained context. This finding is similar to the classic Stroop asymmetry seen in human performance whereby dominant word reading interferes with colour naming for incongruent colour–word compounds. Further analysis also revealed some evidence for a reverse Stroop effect in which the undertrained stimulus element interfered with performance on the overtrained task.     

Acquisition and reversal of a discriminated autoshaped response in male and female rats: Effects of long or short and fixed or variable intertrial interval durations

Groups of male and female Wistar rats were exposed to autoshaping procedures in which the duration (50 vs 20 s) and the variablity (fixed vs variable) of the intertrial interval were manipulated. Pellet delivery occurred after one of the levers (CS+) had been presented for 10 s. Presentation of the other lever (CS−) was not associated with pellet delivery. CS+ contacts occurred more frequently and at higher rates when the intertrial interval was 50 s than when it was 20 s, while intertrial interval variability did not play an important role. Males contacted CS+ and CS− more frequently and at a higher rate than did females. Goal-directed activity (nose pokes in feeder tray) occurred more often when the intertrial interval was short than when it was long. Females showed higher goal-directed activity than did males, both during CS presentation and during the intertrial interval. When experimental contingencies were reversed, CS+ contacts decreased and CS− contacts increased for males and females, but the decrease in CS+ contacts occurred more slowly for males than for females. The results of these experiments add to a growing body of literature suggesting the existence of fundamental behavioral differences between the sexes. These differences are partly attributable to the influence of gonadal hormones during development and maturation and partly attributable to the behavioral requirements of the experimental procedures.