The shift from a response strategy to object-in-place strategy during learning is accompanied by a matching shift in neural firing correlates in the hippocampus

Hippocampal-dependent tasks often involve specific associations among stimuli (including egocentric information), and such tasks are therefore prone to interference from irrelevant task strategies before a correct strategy is found. Using an object-place paired-associate task, we investigated changes in neural firing patterns in the hippocampus in association with a shift in strategy during learning. We used an object-place paired-associate task in which a pair of objects was presented in two different arms of a radial maze. Each object was associated with reward only in one of the arms, thus requiring the rats to consider both object identity and its location in the maze. Hippocampal neurons recorded in CA1 displayed a dynamic transition in their firing patterns during the acquisition of the task across days, and this corresponded to a shift in strategy manifested in behavioral data. Specifically, before the rats learned the task, they chose an object that maintained a particular egocentric relationship with their body (response strategy) irrespective of the object identity. However, as the animal acquired the task, it chose an object according to both its identity and the associated location in the maze (object-in-place strategy). We report that CA1 neurons in the hippocampus changed their prospective firing correlates according to the dominant strategy (i.e., response versus object-in-place strategy) employed at a given stage of learning. The results suggest that neural firing pattern in the hippocampus is heavily influenced by the task demand hypothesized by the animal and the firing pattern changes flexibly as the perceived task demand changes.An event often involves objects placed in particular locations. To form a cognitive representation of such an event, an animal needs to represent many heterogeneous pieces of information such as individual objects, their spatial locations, and also egocentric body movements associated with the navigation through the objects and locations. All the information then needs to be associated in a correct way (e.g., proper object-place association) for successful representation of the event. Processing only a subset of information successfully may lead to an error in identifying the correct event. It is believed that the hippocampus is essential for forming and retrieving such conjunctive representations among stimuli for processing events (O''Reilly and McClelland 1994).Due to its conjunctive information processing after receiving inputs from multiple sources (e.g., information for object recognition, egocentric memory, allocentric memory, etc.), the hippocampal system is prone to competition with other systems especially when a simpler strategy that requires information from a single source seems a viable option. Behavioral and pharmacological studies have supported this hypothesis (Packard and McGaugh 1996; Poldrack and Packard 2003). Physiologically, the influence of switching strategy on hippocampal neuronal firing has been documented in the literature and often tested in a plus maze. It has been shown, for example, that passing a common area of space using different task demands alters the firing properties of hippocampal neurons (Wood et al. 2000; Ferbinteanu and Shapiro 2003; Lee et al. 2006; Eschenko and Mizumori 2007). In most of these studies, however, rats were pre-trained before electrophysiological recordings were made and an experimenter enforced the change in task demand. Therefore, it has been difficult to investigate a naturally occurring competition between different strategies as learning proceeds and the resulting neural dynamics in the hippocampus especially when learning takes place for the first time.Using a hippocampal dependent task, we aimed to characterize such naturally occurring changes in hippocampal firing patterns as a wrong strategy is replaced by the correct strategy during learning. We also investigated the relationships between the changes in firing patterns and behavioral performance. We used a biconditional object-place paired-associate task for this purpose. We demonstrated previously that hippocampal lesioned rats were severely impaired in this task (Lee and Solivan 2008). In this task, two different objects are presented simultaneously as a pair, and rats are required to discriminate between the objects according to the location (an arm in a radial maze) in which they are presented. Once it enters an arm, the rat positions itself between two objects and must choose either the left or right direction toward either object to displace the object for obtaining a food reward. Since the relative object positions within an arm vary across trials, remembering the running direction in which a reward is found (i.e., response strategy) is meaningless and the rat must learn to pay attention to the object identity and its associated location in space (i.e., object-in-place strategy). In our previous studies (Lee and Solivan 2008, 2010; Jo and Lee 2010), we observed a strong competition in this task between a response strategy and object-in-place strategy. Normal rats used the response strategy before learning occurred, but exhibited a sharp transition to the object-in-place strategy in several days. The selective involvement of the hippocampus was strongly implicated in the task as the hippocampal lesioned rats show stereotypic egocentric responses (Lee and Solivan 2008). The current study aimed to find and characterize in detail matching neural correlates in the hippocampus in the object-place paired-associate task.     

Prefrontal cortex and hippocampus subserve different components of working memory in rats

Both the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and hippocampus are implicated in working memory tasks in rodents. Specifically, it has been hypothesized that the mPFC is primarily engaged in the temporary storage and processing of information lasting from a subsecond to several seconds, while the hippocampal function becomes more critical as the working memory demand extends into longer temporal scales. Although these structures may be engaged in a temporally separable manner, the extent of their contributions in the "informational content" of working memory remains unclear. To investigate this issue, the mPFC and dorsal hippocampus (dHPC) were temporarily inactivated via targeted infusions of the GABA(A) receptor agonist muscimol in rats prior to their performance on a delayed alternation task (DAT), employing an automated figure-eight maze that required the animals to make alternating arm choice responses after 3-, 30-, and 60-sec delays for water reward. We report that inactivation of either the mPFC or dHPC significantly reduced DAT at all delay intervals tested. However, there were key qualitative differences in the behavioral effects. Specifically, mPFC inactivation selectively impaired working memory (i.e., arm choice accuracy) without altering reference memory (i.e., the maze task rule) and arm choice response latencies. In contrast, dHPC inactivation increased both reference memory errors and arm choice response latencies. Moreover, dHPC, but not mPFC, inactivation increased the incidence of successive working memory errors. These results suggest that while both the mPFC and hippocampus are necessarily involved in DAT, they seem to process different informational components associated with the memory task.     

Memory for objects and their locations: the role of the hippocampus in retention of object-place associations

Computational models of hippocampal function have suggested that the hippocampus is involved in the formation and storage of arbitrary associations. Previous studies have shown that rats with hippocampal lesions are impaired in object-place associative learning. However, few studies have examined the role of the hippocampus in the retention of previously learned arbitrary associations. In the present study, male Long-Evans rats with either cortical control or hippocampal lesions were tested on a task measuring the retention of previously learned arbitrary associations using an object-place paired-associate task. To assess retention, each animal was trained on the paired-associate task for 360 trials, then received a lesion, and was retested to examine retention of the previously learned associations. The results indicate that all rats learned the task prior to surgery. Following surgery, rats with cortical control lesions were not impaired in the retention of object-place associations. In contrast, hippocampal lesions resulted in an initial deficit in retention of the paired-associate task followed by recovery. Therefore, the hippocampus may play a role in the retrieval of previously learned arbitrary association.     

Spatial imagery of novel places based on visual scene transformation

The hippocampus is known to maintain memories of object-place associations that can produce a scene expectation at a novel viewpoint. To implement such capabilities, the memorized distances and directions of an object from the viewer at a fixed location should be integrated with the imaginary displacement to the new viewpoint. However, neural dynamics of such scene expectation at the novel viewpoint have not been discussed. In this study, we propose a method of coding novel places based on visual scene transformation as a component of the object-place memory in the hippocampus. In this coding, a novel place is represented by a transformed version of a viewer’s scene with imaginary displacement. When the places of individual objects are stored with the coding in the hippocampus, the object’s displacement at the imaginary viewpoint can be evaluated through the comparison of a transformed viewer’s scene with the stored scene. Results of computer experiments demonstrated that the coding successfully produced scene expectation of a three object arrangement at a novel viewpoint. Such the scene expectation was retained even without similarities between the imaginary scene and the real scene at the location, where the imaginary scenes only functioned as indices to denote the topographical relationship between object locations. The results suggest that the hippocampus uses the place coding based on scene transformation and implements the spatial imagery of object-place associations from the novel viewpoint.     

The medial prefrontal cortex and memory of cue location in the rat

We developed a single-trial cue-location memory task in which rats experienced an auditory cue while exploring an environment. They then recalled and avoided the sound origination point after the cue was paired with shock in a separate context. Subjects with medial prefrontal cortical (mPFC) lesions made no such avoidance response, but both lesioned and control subjects avoided the cue itself when presented at test. A follow up assessment revealed no spatial learning impairment in either group. These findings suggest that the rodent mPFC is required for incidental learning or recollection of the location at which a discrete cue occurred, but is not required for cue recognition or for allocentric spatial memory.     

Perirhinal cortex is necessary for acquiring,but not for retrieving object–place paired association

Remembering events frequently involves associating objects and their associated locations in space, and it has been implicated that the areas associated with the hippocampus are important in this function. The current study examined the role of the perirhinal cortex in retrieving familiar object–place paired associates, as well as in acquiring novel ones. Rats were required to visit one of two locations of a radial-arm maze and choose one of the objects (from a pair of different toy objects) exclusively associated with a given arm. Excitotoxic lesions of the perirhinal cortex initially impaired the normal retrieval of object–place paired-associative memories that had been learned presurgically, but the animals relearned gradually to the level of controls. In contrast, when required to associate a novel pair of objects with the same locations of the maze, the same lesioned rats were severely impaired with minimal learning, if any, taking place throughout an extensive testing period. However, the lesioned rats were normal in discriminating two different objects presented in a fixed arm in the maze. The results suggest that the perirhinal cortex is indispensable to forming discrete representations for object–place paired associates. Its role, however, may be compensated for by other structures when familiar object–place paired associative memories need to be retrieved.Remembering an event in space often requires associating objects and their locations. Associating object and place information into a unitary event representation is believed to be a foundation of episodic memory (Cahusac et al. 1989; Gaffan 1994; Davachi 2006). It has been suggested that the hippocampus and its associated regions in the medial temporal lobe (MTL) are essential in this cognitive process, and amnesic patients with damage in the MTL structures exhibit severe deficits in associating object and place information (Smith and Milner 1981; Vargha-Khadem et al. 1997; Stepankova et al. 2004). Animal models produced by localized lesions in the hippocampus and other MTL structures also support the idea by showing that the lesioned animals are impaired in associating objects and places (Parkinson et al. 1988; Gaffan and Parker 1996; Sziklas et al. 1998; Bussey et al. 2001; Gilbert and Kesner 2003, 2004; Malkova and Mishkin 2003; Lee et al. 2005; Bachevalier and Nemanic 2008; Kesner et al. 2008; Lee and Solivan 2008). Although the theoretical importance of the MTL structures in object–place association has been well acknowledged, specific contributions of the MTL structures in object–place associative memory are poorly understood. The current study examined the role of the perirhinal cortex, one of the extra hippocampal regions in the MTL, using a behavioral paradigm previously shown to be dependent on the intact hippocampus (Lee and Solivan 2008).The literature suggests that the role of the hippocampus in the object–place paired-associate task is to put together object and place information into a unified and distinct event representation. It has been suggested that spatial information and nonspatial information (such as object information) may be streamed into the hippocampus in a relatively segregated fashion, the former information mostly fed through the medial entorhinal cortex to the hippocampus via the postrhinal cortex and the latter being fed through the lateral entorhinal cortex via the perirhinal cortex (Mishkin et al. 1997; Suzuki et al. 1997; Burwell 2000; Fyhn et al. 2004; Witter and Amaral 2004; Hafting et al. 2005; Hargreaves et al. 2005; Furtak et al. 2007; Kerr et al. 2007). In our previous study (Lee and Solivan 2008) in which rats were required to discriminate rewarding versus nonrewarding pairs of similar object–place paired associates, the hippocampal lesioned rats demonstrated severe and irrecoverable deficits. The results from the study not only corroborate the long-held view that the hippocampus associates object and place information, but also demonstrate that the hippocampus is critical for disambiguating similar object–place paired associates. However, it requires examining functions of other upstream structures of the hippocampus to conclusively assign the role of associating object and place information to the hippocampus. If, for example, lesions produced in the perirhinal cortex produce similar deficits, it would be premature to conclude that the association between object and place information uniquely occurs in the hippocampus.To elucidate the relative contributions of the MTL structures in the hippocampal-dependent object–place paired-associate task (Fig. 1), we manipulated the perirhinal cortex in the current study, one of the regions implicated as an object-information provider to the hippocampus (Knierim et al. 2006; Eichenbaum and Lipton 2008). Here we tested whether the perirhinal cortex was involved in the acquisition of new object–place paired associations. Importantly, we also tested the perirhinal cortical contributions to retrieving learned paired associates between objects and places. In the current study, the rats needed to pay attention to both object and place information. Therefore, if the perirhinal cortex is unique in its function for providing object information to the hippocampus, it is predicted that lesions in the perirhinal cortex will produce severe deficits as seen in the hippocampal lesioned animals in our previous study. A simple object-discrimination task that did not require spatial information was also employed to further examine the role of the perirhinal cortex only in specific conditions.Open in a separate windowFigure 1.Illustration of the radial arm maze and behavioral paradigms. (A) Phase 1: Two objects (Spider-Man and LEGO block) were presented on arms 3 and 5 in gray color. Only one of the objects was rewarded in arm 3 (Spider-Man) and arm 5 (LEGO block) irrespective of its locations in the choice platform. Possible configuration of objects and appropriate choices are provided for both arms. In each trial, only one arm was open in the maze and objects were available in that open arm. (B) Phase 2: For acquisition of novel object–place paired associations, a pair of new objects (Barney and Girl) was presented on arms 3 and 5. Possible locations of the objects are shown as in A. Each object was rewarded only in a particular arm (Barney in arm 3 and Girl in arm 5) irrespective of its location in the choice platform. (C) Phase 3: Illustration of the task using only one arm (arm 4) in the maze. Two new objects (Mr. Potatohead and Cylinder) were used and the Mr. Potatohead choice was rewarded regardless of its location in the choice platform.     

Dorsal hippocampus function in learning and expressing a spatial discrimination

Learning to discriminate between spatial locations defined by two adjacent arms of a radial maze in the conditioned cue preference paradigm requires two kinds of information: latent spatial learning when the rats explore the maze with no food available, and learning about food availability in two spatial locations when the rats are then confined in one arm with food and the other with no food. Previous research showed that a functional dorsal hippocampus is not required for latent learning. The present experiments show that it is required for learning about food availability, and during retrieval of both types of information.     

Critical role of the cholinergic system for object-in-place associative recognition memory

Object-in-place memory, which relies on the formation of associations between an object and the place in which it was encountered, depends upon a neural circuit comprising the perirhinal (PRH) and medial prefrontal (mPFC) cortices. This study examined the contribution of muscarinic cholinergic neurotransmission within this circuit to such object-in-place associative memory. Intracerebral administration of scopolamine in the PRH or mPFC impaired memory acquisition, but not retrieval and importantly we showed that unilateral blockade of muscarinic receptors simultaneously in both regions in opposite hemispheres, significantly impaired performance. Thus, object-in-place associative memory depends upon cholinergic modulation of neurones within the PRH-PFC circuit.Recognition memory enables individuals to judge whether stimuli have been encountered before. In its most basic form such judgments may be made on the basis of simply whether a stimulus is familiar or novel (familiarity discrimination). However, these judgments may also be made using associations formed between a stimulus and the location or environmental setting in which it was previously encountered. Such object-in-place associative memory in animals is of particular interest as it is acquired rapidly and it requires the integration of object and spatial information and thus has been described as an analog of human episodic memory (Wilson et al. 2008).The perirhinal cortex (PRH) in the medial temporal lobe is a critical neural structure for object recognition and object-in-place associative memory (Bussey et al. 2000; Barker et al. 2007), but unlike object recognition, this memory process is also dependent on the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) (Kesner and Ragozzino 2003; Browning et al. 2005; Barker et al. 2007) and crucially it has been shown to depend upon a functional interaction between the PRH and mPFC, with each region making a distinct cognitive contribution to the memory formation (Barker et al. 2007; Barker and Warburton 2008).Having identified two neural regions critical for object-in-place associative memory, we now extend our investigations to explore the underlying cellular mechanisms mediating acquisition or retrieval of this memory process. The present study focused on the neurotransmitter acetylcholine as cholinergic innervation of the PRH is crucial for familiarity discrimination (Tang et al. 1997; Easton and Gaffan 2001; Warburton et al. 2003; Abe et al. 2004; Winters and Bussey 2005). In contrast, the role of muscarinic receptor neurotransmission in the PRH or mPFC in object-in-place associative memory is unknown. Further, while it might appear that object recognition memory and object-in-place memory are likely to share common neural substrates, recent data from our laboratory suggest that this may not be the case (Griffiths et al. 2008).To explore the importance of muscarinic cholinergic neurotransmission within the PRH-mPFC circuit for object-in-place memory, rats were implanted with bilateral cannulae aimed at the PRH or mPFC or both regions to allow direct intracerebral administration of scopolamine during distinct stages of an object-in-place task. Memory performance was tested following either a short (5 min) or long (1 h) retention delay. All animal procedures were performed in accordance with the United Kingdom Animals Scientific Procedures Act (1986) and associated guidelines. Details of the surgery, infusion procedures, behavioral testing, and histology have been published previously (Barker and Warburton 2008). Briefly, male DA rats (230–250 g, Bantin and Kingman, UK) housed under a 12-h/12-h light/dark cycle (light phase 18:00–6:00 h), were anesthetized with isoflurane (induction 4%, maintenance 2%–3%) and surgically implanted with bilateral cannulae aimed at either the PRH or mPFC or both regions. After a two-week recovery period all rats were handled, habituated, and then tested in the object-in-place memory task.Sample phase: Each rat was placed in a black open-topped wooden arena (50 × 90 × 100 cm) containing four different objects (A, B, C, D) constructed from “Duplo” (Lego UK Ltd.). The walls of the arena were surrounded with a black cloth to a height of 1.5 m, and the floor covered with sawdust. The objects were placed 15 cm from the walls (see Fig. 1A) and each rat was allowed to explore the objects for 5 min, after which it was removed for the delay (5 min or 1 h). Exploratory behavior was defined as the animal directing its nose toward the object at a distance of <2 cm. Any other behavior, such as looking around while sitting on or resting against the object, was not recorded. Subjects that failed to complete a minimum of 15-s exploration in the sample phase or 10 s of exploration in the test phase were excluded from the analysis.Open in a separate windowFigure 1.Diagrammatic representations of the individual infusion sites in each animal. (A) Bilateral medial prefrontal (mPFC) group. (B) Bilateral perirhinal (PRH) group. (C) The mPFC infusion sites of the PRH+mPFC group. (D) The PRH infusion sites of the PRH+mPFC group. All of the infusion sites were within the PRH or mPFC.Test phase: Two of the objects, e.g., B and D, exchanged positions and the subjects were replaced in the arena for 3 min. The time spent exploring the two objects that had changed position was compared to the time spent exploring the two objects that had remained in the same position. If object-in-place memory is intact, subjects spend more time exploring the “moved” objects, compared to the “unmoved” objects. Scopolamine hydrobromide (Sigma-Aldrich) dissolved in sterile 0.9% saline solution was administered at a dose of 10 μg/μL per hemisphere (Schroeder and Packard 2002; Warburton et al. 2003; Winters et al. 2006); control infusions consisted of saline. The infusions were given either 15 min before the sample phase or 15 min before the test phase. At the end of the experiment, each rat was anesthetized and perfused transcardially. Coronal brain sections (40 μm) were stained with cresyl-violet to verify the cannulae locations. All the rats in the PRH group had the tip of the bilateral cannulae in the PRH and all the rats in the mPFC group had tips in the ventral portion of the prelimbic or dorsal portion of the infralimbic region of the prefrontal cortex (Fig. 1B). From unpublished observations, using Indian ink and radiolabeled scopolamine, the region infused is estimated to be 1–1.5 mm³, and largely confined to perirhinal cortex or the prelimbic/infralimbic regions of the prefrontal cortex. This spread is consistent with previously quoted results in other brain regions (Martin 1991; Izquierdo et al. 2000; Attwell et al. 2001). Figure 2, A and B show the performance of the rats receiving bilateral infusions of scopolamine or vehicle into either the PRH (n = 12) or mPFC (n = 12) 15 min prior to the sample phase. After a minimum of 48 h, vehicle or scopolamine was infused in a cross-over design and the animal retested using different objects. A three-way ANOVA (drug × region × delay) showed that scopolamine infusion into either region significantly impaired the acquisition of object-in-place memory (main effect of drug F _(1,35) = 63.87, P < 0.001). The magnitude of the deficit was similar irrespective of the region into which scopolamine was infused (region F _(1,35) < 1.0) or the delay employed (delay F _(1,35) < 1.0). Further analyses to examine whether individual groups discriminated between the objects, using a within subjects t-test (two-tailed), confirmed that vehicle-treated animals in the PRH and mPFC groups showed a significant preference for the moved objects over the objects that had remained in the same position, irrespective of the retention delay (PRH 5 min t ₍₉₎ = 2.96, P < 0.02; 1 h t ₍₁₀₎ = 5.71, P < 0.001: mPFC 5 min t ₍₅₎ = 5.47, P < 0.005; 1 h t ₍₁₁₎ = 9.89, P < 0.001), while scopolamine infusion into the PRH or mPFC significantly disrupted the animal''s ability to discriminate (PRH 5min t ₍₉₎ = 0.13, P = 0.9; 1 h t ₍₁₀₎ = 0.92, P = 0.38: mPFC 5 min t ₍₅₎ = 0.051, P = 0.961; 1 h t ₍₁₁₎ = 0.68, P = 0.51). Scopolamine was without effect on the total amount of exploration completed in the sample or test phases (all Fs < 1.0).Open in a separate windowFigure 2.Discrimination between the objects was calculated using a discrimination ratio, which takes into account individual differences in the total amount of exploration. The discrimination ratio is calculated as follows: the difference in time spent by each animal exploring objects that changed position compared to the objects that remained in the same position divided by the total time spent exploring all objects. (A) Infusion of scopolamine (Scop) into the perirhinal cortex (PRH) significantly impaired performance in the object-in-place task following a 5 min and a 1 h delay. (B) Infusion of scopolamine (Scop) into the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) significantly impaired performance in the object-in-place task following a 5 min and a 1 h delay. Illustrated for each group is the mean (+ SEM) discrimination ratio. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; and *** P < 0.001 difference between groups.It could be argued that the impairment produced by intracortical infusions of scopolamine following a short delay, reflects an effect on retrieval as well as acquisition. Therefore, we examined the effect of pretest administration of scopolamine (infusion 15 min before the start of the test phase) in the mPFC or PRH following a 1 h delay. No significant impairments were found (mean discrimination ratio ± SEM: PRH vehicle 0.38 ± 0.07, scopolamine 0.46 ± 0.11; mPFC vehicle 0.37 ± 0.08, scopolamine 0.44 ± 0.05), confirmed by a nonsignificant drug effect (F _(1,14) < 1.0, P > 0.1) and nonsignificant drug × area interaction (F _(1,14) = <  1.0, P > 0.1). In addition all groups significantly discriminated between the moved objects compared to objects in the same location (PRH vehicle t ₍₇₎ = 4.95, P < 0.01; PRH scopolamine t ₍₇₎ = 3.45, P < 0.05; mPFC vehicle t ₍₇₎ = 4.26, P < 0.01; mPFC scopolamine t ₍₇₎ = 8.37, P < 0.01). Scopolamine was without effect on the total amount of exploration completed in the test phase (drug × region F _(1,14) < 1.0, P > 0.05).To evaluate the importance of intrahemispheric interactions between these cortical regions and the cholinergic system, a third group of animals had cannulae implanted into both the PRH and mPFC (n = 12). In this experiment the behavioral effects of unilateral scopolamine infusions into the PRH and mPFC in the same hemisphere (Scop Ipsi) were compared with the effects of unilateral scopolamine infusions into opposite hemispheres (Scop Contra). The animals assigned to the Scop Ipsi group on day one, received infusions into opposite hemispheres (Scop Contra) on day two (minimum of 48 h later). Likewise, the animals in the Scop Contra group on day one, received ipsilateral infusions on day two. Figure 3 shows discrimination performance following a 5 min or 1 h delay. A two-way within-subject ANOVA revealed that the Scop Contra group was significantly impaired (infusion F _(1,20) = 44.35, P < 0.001) irrespective of the delay (infusion × delay F _(1,20) < 1.0, P < 0.05). Further analysis confirmed that the Scop Contra group failed to discriminate between the moved and unmoved objects (5 min t ₍₁₀₎ = 0.70, P > 0.1; 1 h t ₍₁₀₎ = 1.03, P > 0.1), while the Scop Ipsi group preferentially explored the moved objects (5 min t ₍₁₀₎ = 9.99, P < 0.0001; 1 h t ₍₁₀₎ = 4.34, P = 0.001).Open in a separate windowFigure 3.Unilateral scopolamine infusions into the PRH and mPFC in opposite hemispheres (Scop Contra) impaired object-in-place performance following both a 5 min and a 1 h delay. Scopolamine infusions into both the PRH and mPFC in the same hemisphere (Scop Ipsi) had no effect on performance following either delay. ** P < 0.01 and *** P < 0.001 difference between groups.Scopolamine was without effect on overall exploration levels during the sample (infusion × delay F _(1,20) < 1.0, P > 0.05; infusion F _(1,20) < 1.0, P > 0.05; delay F _(1,20) < 1.0, P > 0.05) or test phases (infusion × delay F _(1,20) < 1.0, P  >  0.05; infusion F _(1,20)  <  1.0, P > 0.05). There was a significant main effect of delay (F _(1,20) = 10.67, P < 0.01), as the Scop Ipsi and Scop Contra groups completed a greater amount of exploration in the test phase following a 1 h delay compared to a 5 min delay.These results demonstrate that acquisition, but not retrieval of object-in-place memory, is dependent upon muscarinic cholinergic neurotransmission in both the mPFC and PRH. Thus, acute bilateral administration of scopolamine directly into the mPFC or PRH before the sample phase impaired both short- and long-term memory performances. In contrast administration of scopolamine into either the mPFC or PRH prior to the test phase had no effect. Significantly, co-administration of scopolamine into the PRH and mPFC in opposite hemispheres produced a significant impairment in both short-term and long-term object-in-place memory compared to performance following co-administration of scopolamine into the PRH and mPFC in the same hemisphere. Thus, concomitant activation of cholinergic muscarinic receptors is necessary in both regions for the formation of object-in-place associative recognition memory.Our previous studies investigating the role of the mPFC and PRH in object-in-place associative memory suggest that these regions make different cognitive contributions to this mnemonic process. Thus, the PRH appears to be primarily involved in the acquisition of “object” information, while we have hypothesized that the role of the mPFC is to integrate object and place information (Barker et al. 2007). As administration of scopolamine into either region disrupted performance following a long- or short-retention delay, the present data suggest that the neural mechanisms underlying both these different cognitive processes must be dependent upon cholinergic neurotransmission.The results demonstrate that muscarinic receptor neurotransmission is clearly critical for acquisition of the object-in-place task as no impairment was produced when scopolamine was administered only prior to the test phase. While the current study is the first to investigate the importance of cholinergic neurotransmission in object-in-place associative memory, a number of previous studies have shown that intra-PRH infusions of scopolamine block discrimination of novel and familiar objects when administered prior to the sample phase, but not when administered immediately after the sample phase or prior to the test phase (Aigner and Mishkin 1986; Aigner et al. 1991; Warburton et al. 2003; Winters et al. 2006). Thus, together these results support the hypothesis that muscarinic cholinergic neurotransmission within the PRH is necessary for encoding representations of new visual stimuli for subsequent recognition (Turchi et al. 2005), but not for the retrieval of such information. The present results also show for the first time that muscarinic receptor neurotransmission within the mPFC is crucial for the encoding, but not the retrieval of object-in-place memory.It may be argued that the disruptions in performance following administration of scopolamine reflect disruptions in attentional processing. Indeed muscarinic cholinergic neurotransmission in the prefrontal cortex has been implicated in both mnemonic and attentional processes (Voytko et al. 1994; Everitt and Robbins 1997; Chudasama et al. 2004; Dalley et al. 2004). However, deficits in attentional processing are typically observed when the attentional demands of the tasks are high, for example, when very short (millisecond) stimulus exposure times are used (Chudasama et al. 2004; Dalley et al. 2004). In the present study, the exposure time to the stimuli is relatively long (minutes); further there was no evidence of a drug-associated change in explorative behavior following either an infusion into the mPFC or PRH or simultaneously into both regions. Thus, it seems unlikely that the impairments in memory observed can be attributed purely to an attentional deficit, although it is possible that during the encoding of the object-in-place task attentional processes are also recruited involving the cholinergic afferents to the mPFC or PRH.The results showing that simultaneous muscarinic cholinergic blockade in the PRH and mPFC produces a significant impairment in performance support our previous findings of a neural system for object-in-place memory and extend these findings to show that cholinergic neurotransmission is a key component within the system. Our results also support those studies in primates demonstrating a circuit involving the basal forebrain, frontal cortex, and inferior temporal cortex is necessary for object memory encoding (Easton et al. 2002; Easton and Parker 2003).Results from our laboratory have shown that the maintenance of long-term, but not short-term, object-in-place memory is critically dependent upon concurrent NMDA receptor activation in the PRH and mPFC (Barker and Warburton 2008), while short-term object-in-place performance is dependent upon kainate receptor activation in the PRH. Hence, we have argued that there may be multiple cellular mechanisms underlying encoding of information for the short or long term. The present study contrasts with these findings as it demonstrates the necessity for muscarinic receptor activation for both short- and long-term object-in-place memory. Primate studies have indicated that a synergistic interaction between the cholinergic and glutamatergic systems plays an important role in the regulation of visual recognition memory (Matsuoka and Aigner 1996). Hence, further investigations are warranted to explore such interactions in the rat; for example, an interaction between NMDA and muscarinic receptor neurotransmission may mediate long-term recognition memory, while a kainate–muscarinic receptor interaction may mediate short-term recognition memory. Further, the extent to which the contribution of the cholinergic system to encoding of object-in-place memory within the PRH-mPFC system is the same for both short- or long-term memory is unknown.Our results have demonstrated that when a subject is required to use information concerning an association between an object and a place to produce a behavioral response, muscarinic cholinergic receptors in the mPFC are involved. Further, the object-in-place task requires the subject to acquire and remember the topographical relationship between the objects, a process that is known to depend upon the parietal cortex (Goodrich-Hunsaker et al. 2005). The precise contribution of object and spatial information processing in the parietal cortex to the operation of the PRH-mPFC circuit has yet to be determined.In conclusion, the cholinergic projections to the PRH and mPFC originating in the basal forebrain (Wenk et al. 1980) are an important component of the neural mechanisms underlying short- and long-term object-in-place associative memory.     

The role of the hippocampus in the retrieval of a spatial location

Based on computational models of the hippocampus, it has been suggested that a possible mechanism for memory retrieval is pattern completion, wherein an autoassociative network recalls previous patterns of activity given noisy or degraded cues. However, there are few behavioral data examining pattern completion per se in the hippocampus. Here, we present a study in which rats were tested on a spatial location retrieval paradigm, each trial of which consisted of a sample and choice phase. During the sample phase, rats were trained to displace an object in one of 15 possible locations to retrieve a food reward and return to the start-box on a cheeseboard maze. The object was then removed and the same location was re-baited for the choice phase. The rats' accuracy in returning to the correct location was recorded. On test trials, visual extramaze cues, vestibular cues, or both were manipulated to assess pattern completion in normal rats. Subjects were then randomly assigned to receive a cortical control, a sham, or a dorsal and ventral hippocampal lesion and were retested on the task. Control and unoperated rats were able to perform the task when visual extramaze or vestibular cues were reliable, but not when they were manipulated. Rats with hippocampal lesions were impaired in the baseline condition, as well as during all manipulations. These results support the hypothesis that the hippocampus supports the retrieval of a spatial location, possibly through a process of pattern completion.     

Spatial Location Learning in Mice with Ibotenate Lesions of Entorhinal Cortex or Subiculum

This study examined the effects of ibotenate lesions of either the entorhinal cortex (EC) or the subiculum (SUB) on the ability of mice to memorize a single spatial location (initial discrimination), and on their capacity to switch to a new location (transfer) following the initial learning in an eight-arm radial maze. Results indicated that mice with ibotenate lesions of the EC or SUB were impaired in postoperative acquisition of the spatial discrimination task, making more reference, but not working memory, errors and displaying fewer first correct response trials than sham-operated control mice. Furthermore, additional damage to the ventral hippocampus exacerbated the impairment of performance induced by lesions of the SUB alone. In addition, all mice, except for the combined lesion group, exhibited similar performance levels when they were trained to choose another arm of the maze that had not previously been baited (transfer). These findings suggest that both the EC and the SUB play important roles in spatial information processing in mice.     

Neonatal ventral hippocampus lesions disrupt extra-dimensional shift and alter dendritic spine density in the medial prefrontal cortex of juvenile rats

Recent data showed that neonatal ventral hippocampus (VH) lesions, an approach used to model schizophrenia symptoms in rodents, produce premature deficits of working memory believed to be associated with early medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) maldevelopment. This experiment expands the investigation of mPFC integrity in juvenile rats with neonatal VH lesions by assessing behavioral flexibility and dendritic spine density. Sixteen Sprague-Dawley male pups received bilateral microinjections of ibotenic acid in the VH or SHAM surgery on postnatal day (PND) 6. On PND 29 and 30, rats were subjected to a spatial shift task in a cross-maze; an attentional set-shifting task was then administered on two consecutive days, between PND 33 and PND 35. Rats were sacrificed at PND 36 and dendritic spine density in the mPFC was assessed using Golgi-Cox staining procedure. Results revealed impaired extra-dimensional shift in VH-lesioned rats and inconsistent reversal discrimination outcomes. Although lesioned animals displayed intact performance in the spatial shift, rates of perseverative responses were higher than normal in this task. Neonatal VH damage resulted in lower dendritic spine density in the mPFC than measured in control brains; however, no significant correlation was found between this outcome and behavioral data. Juvenile morphological and cognitive perturbations are consistent with the early emergence of mPFC anomalies following neonatal VH lesions. Results are discussed in relation with potential common mechanisms linking pre- and post-pubertal onsets of behavioral dysfunction.     

Strategy selection in a task with spatial and nonspatial components: effects of fimbria-fornix lesions in rats.

The main purpose of the present research was to investigate the ability of rats to learn a 12-arm radial maze task that requires the concurrent utilization of both spatial and intramaze cue information. The task involves in a single trial both place and cue learning as well as reference memory (RM) and working memory (WM). Since the animal can choose place and cue arms in any order, the strategies employed to learn the task can be studied as well as the kinds of memory errors that are made. The results of Experiment 1 showed that the number of errors made on the place and cue components of the task did not differ, and that more RM than WM errors were made early during learning. As the task was learned, the animals tended to choose the place arms before choosing the intramaze cue arms, thus suggesting that a spatial strategy was employed first followed by a cue strategy. In Experiment 2 lesions of the fimbria-fornix resulted in temporary impairments in both RM and WM that were especially apparent on the spatial component of the task. The lesioned rats also switched from choosing mostly place arms early during the trial to choosing more cue arms. While fimbria-fornix lesioned rats recovered from the memory impairments with training, the change in response strategy persisted throughout postoperative testing. The procedure of combining both spatial and non-spatial components concurrently in the same task should prove of value in studying response strategies in animals.     

Concurrent verbal interference of right and left proximal and distal upper extremity tapping

The purpose of this study was to investigate crossed and uncrossed control of the proximal (upper arm and shoulder) and distal (lower arm and hand) musculature of the arms using the dual-task paradigm. Forty-one strongly right-handed men performed a tapping task using primarily the musculature of the upper or lower arms, with and without concurrent verbal processing demands. The results showed that the left distal region was distinguished from the other three effector locations by its relative insensitivity to the demands of the dual-task (verbal processing) condition. Rapid alternating movements of the left arm were functionally independent from the left index finger location in response to dual-task demands. Dual verbal and tapping demands at this effector produced greater interference on both the primary and secondary task. The results preclude the attribution of interference effects to manual dominance factors alone. The results generally support anatomical accounts of increased ipsilateral control over left side arm but not hand movements. Neither the traditional cognitive hemispheric model nor the manual dominance hypothesis were adequate in accounting for the results. An alternative generalized capacity hypothesis was required to account for performance at the LE.     

Distinct Profile of Working Memory Errors Following Acute or Chronic Disruption of the Cholinergic Septohippocampal Pathway

The behavioral effects of two amnestic treatments (intraseptal chlordiazepoxide (CDP) and intraventricular AF64A) were examined in a delayed-nonmatch-to-sample radial-arm maze (DNMTS) paradigm. The types of errors induced by these treatments in this working memory task were assessed to determine how acute and chronic disruptions of the medial septum affect different phases of working memory (encoding, maintenance, retrieval). Rats were initially trained to perform the DNMTS task with a 1-h delay imposed between the training and the testing sessions. The first experiment demonstrated that intraseptal injection of 30 nmoles of CDP did not produce state-dependent learning. Rats were injected immediately following training with CDP or artificial cerobrospinal fluid (CSF; drug vehicle) and then prior to testing with CDP or CSF. Injection of CDP immediately following training (CDP–CSF) impaired performance of the task regardless of whether CDP was also administered before the postdelay test (CDP–CDP). Rats infused with CDP only before the postdelay test (CSF–CDP) exhibited a proactive deficit characterized by intact retention of the predelay information (i.e., arms entered prior to the delay) but impaired performance on the postdelay component (arms entered only after the delay). These data indicate: (i) that state dependency does not explain the working memory deficits induced by intraseptal CDP; (ii) that pretest CDP disrupts the storage and utilization of working memory for current arm selections. The second experiment examined the behavioral effects induced by a permanent disruption of the cholinergic septohippocampal pathway produced by icv injection of the cholinotoxin AF64A. Rats were initially trained on the DNMTS task and then bilaterally injected icv with either AF64A (2.5 nmoles/side) or CSF. AF64A-treated rats exhibited a significant impairment of performance compared to CSF-treated controls. In contrast to the impairment exhibited by CDP-treated rats in Experiment 1, the performance of AF64A-treated rats displayed a deficit in the maintenance/retrieval of information acquired during RAM trainingandan impairment in ability to store current spatial information in working memory to guide postdelay testing performance. These studies demonstrate that acute and chronic disruptions of the septohippocampal pathway produce distinct profiles of cognitive impairment that should help to reveal the behavioral and neurobiological characteristics of spatial memory.     

Memory for frequency in rats: role of the hippocampus and medial prefrontal cortex

On a radial arm maze rats were tested for frequency memory of specific spatial locations, a task that presumably involves the coding of temporal information. On any trial during the study phase rats were allowed to visit three different spatial locations only once and one spatial location twice. During the test phase the rats were given a choice between a spatial location that had been visited once and spatial location that had been visited twice. The rats were reinforced for selecting the twice-visited spatial location. The number of spatial locations between a repetition (lag) was varied from one to three. After extensive training rats displayed memory for frequency only for a lag of three spatial locations, i.e., they displayed a repetition lag effect. Animals then received control, medial prefrontal cortex, or hippocampal lesions. Upon subsequent retests control rats continued to display frequency memory, but animals with medial prefrontal cortex or hippocampal lesions displayed a marked impairment. These data support the idea that both the hippocampus and medial prefrontal cortex code temporal order information.     

Intraseptal administration of muscimol produces dose-dependent memory impairments in the rat

The present study examined the effects of intraseptal administration of the GABAergic agonist muscimol on performance of a radial-arm maze (RAM) task. Male Long-Evans rats were trained to perform a RAM task in which a 1-h delay was imposed between the sample and the test session. In this task rats have access to four out of eight maze arms during a predelay session. Following a 1-h delay, rats are returned to the maze and allowed to freely choose among all eight arms. Arms not blocked during the predelay session are baited, and entry into an arm chosen during the predelay session or a repeated entry into a postdelay chosen arm constitutes an error. Following acquisition, animals were implanted with a single cannula aimed at the medial septum. A within-subjects design was utilized to examine the effects of intraseptal administration of muscimol (0.0, 0.75, 1.5 or 3.0 nmol) on performance in this task. All drugs or artificial cerebrospinal fluid were administered immediately following the predelay session. Muscimol, a GABA-A agonist, produced a dose-dependent impairment in maze performance as evidenced by fewer correct choices in the first four postdelay choices and an increase in the number of errors. Intraseptal administration of muscimol did not significantly alter latency per choice on the RAM task nor did it affect locomotor activity levels. Muscimol-induced impairments were also observed when a 4-h delay was imposed between the fourth and the fifth maze selection, suggesting that the behavioral deficit represents an inability to store or retain spatial working memories rather than a general performance deficit. These data indicated that pharmacological manipulation of GABA-A receptors within the medial septum modifies working memory processes. The potential interaction of GABAergic and cholinergic mechanisms in the modulation of working memory processes is discussed.     

Response biases do not underlie the radial maze deficit in rats with mediodorsal thalamus lesions

Previous results indicating that radial maze performance in animals with mediodorsal thalamic lesions is deficient cannot exclude the possibility that these impairments are due to altered motor mechanisms (response biases). The present study sought to eliminate this potentially confounding variable by using a procedure which tests memory for serial position. This procedure involved experimenter-controlled arm entry (number and order) on a radial arm maze. Following this sequence, animals were presented with one previously entered arm along with an arm not yet visited on that trial. Avoidance of the previously entered arm constituted memory for the prior sequence. Thus, this task represents a form of a win-shift or nonmatching-to-sample task. Seven animals were given ibotenic acid lesions of the mediodorsal nucleus and nine others were given sham operations; 2 weeks later testing in the above procedure was conducted. Results indicated that, although control subjects could differentiate between entered and unentered arms without difficulty, animals with lesions were unable to exhibit this distinction. Much of their memory for arms previously entered in a sequence was at chance level, regardless of the placement of the tested arm in the sequence. Some tendency toward increased errors with longer sequences of arm entries was noted. This may indicate that animals with lesions were susceptible to proactive interference from previous choices. Regardless, even without the opportunity to develop or exhibit response biases, animals lesioned in the mediodorsal nucleus were unable to perform this win-shift task reliably. Thus, discrimination among maze arms is impaired after lesion of the mediodorsal nucleus and this impairment is independent of the motor response patterns which emerge during solution of a conventional radial maze task.     

Transient activation of the CA3 Kappa opioid system in the dorsal hippocampus modulates complex memory processing in mice

The hippocampus plays a central role in various forms of complex learning and memory. Opioid peptides and receptors are abundant in the hippocampus. These peptides are co-released with glutamate from mossy fiber- and lateral perforant path-synapses. In this study, we evaluated the functional relevance of the CA3 Kappa opioid receptors (KOR) by transient pharmacological activation or inactivation using single bilateral intrahippocampal microinjections of a selective agonist (U50,488H, 1 or 2.5 nmol), a selective antagonist (nor-binaltorphimine, norBNI 5 nmol) or a mixture of both. C57Bl/6J mice were tested in a fear conditioning paradigm (FC) or in a modified version of the water maze task thought to reveal how flexibly animals can learn and manipulate spatial information (WM). In FC, the agonist (2.5 nmol) decreased context-induced (but not tone-induced) freezing whereas norBNI had no effect. The impairment caused by the agonist U50,488H was blocked by the injection of norBNI, suggesting that overstimulation of CA3-KOR impairs the acquisition and consolidation of contextual fear-related memory. In the WM task, mice were trained repeatedly each day to find a hidden platform. After having reached this goal, the platform position was changed the next day for a new task. U50,488H injection before the last task abolished the previously acquired ability to find rapidly a new platform location, whereas adding norBNI reversed this impairment. Thus, in the mouse, even partial and topographically restricted activation of CA3-KOR entails impairments in two different hippocampus-dependent tasks, indicating functional relevance of the kappa opioid system.     

Rule-based learning impairment in rats with lesions to the dorsal striatum.

The present study examined the effects of lesions to the dorsal striatum (DS) in Sprague-Dawley rats, when tested on the acquisition and successive shifts in the position of a goal arm in an eight-arm radial maze. In the procedure we used, rats had to retrieve the location of one baited arm among the eight arms of the maze after it had just been presented as a sample during a forced trial. After attainment of a fixed learning criterion, rats were submitted to five successive shifts in the goal location. Results showed that DS rats were able to learn the position of the goal arm during the acquisition phase as efficiently as sham-operated rats. In contrast, when the position of the goal arm was shifted, although DS rats were able to learn its new position, they made significantly more errors and required more sessions to reach criterion than sham-operated rats. These results suggested that both groups did not solve the task using the same behavioral strategy. The analysis of responses made suggested that sham-operated rats solved the task using the pairing rule between the forced and the free run (matching-to-sample rule), while DS rats solved the task using only visuo-spatial processing. These data therefore suggest that the dorsal striatum plays an important role in rule-learning ability.