共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Ram Neta 《Synthese》2006,150(2):247-280
Many epistemologists are interested in offering a positive account of how it is that many of our common sense beliefs enjoy
one or another positive epistemological status (e.g., how they are warranted, justified, reasonable, or what have you). A
number of philosophers, under the influence of Wittgenstein and/or J. L. Austin, have argued that this enterprise is misconceived.
The most effective version of this argument is to be found in Mark Kaplan’s paper “Epistemology on Holiday”. After explaining
what this criticism amounts to and why it is important, I then respond to it. My response is based upon, and is intended to
display the explanatory power of, a contractarian account of our practice of epistemic appraisal. 相似文献
7.
8.
9.
Michael P. Levine 《Philosophia》1989,19(2-3):209-225
‘Epistemics: an enterprise linking traditional epistemology, first with cognitive science and, second, with social scientific and humanistic
disciplines that explore the interpersonal and cultural processes impinging on knowledge and belief’ (Epistemology and Cognition, p. vii) 相似文献
10.
11.
Barry Stroud 《Erkenntnis》2011,75(3):495-503
A brief discussion of the ways in which awareness of and sensitivity to the history of philosophy can contribute to epistemology
even if epistemology is understood as a distinctively philosophical and not primarily historical enterprise. 相似文献
13.
14.
David G. Rowley 《Studies in East European Thought》1996,48(1):1-19
This paper explains how A. Bogdanov changed from a left Bolshevik impatient for armed insurrection into a moderate proponent
of revolution through cultural transformation by placing him in the context of a debate over epistemology among Russian Social
Democrats in the early twentieth century. By relying on neo-Kantian epistemology to justify socialist revolution, N. Berdyaev
actually began to turn away from Marxism. Lenin espoused a naive realism that was consistent with scientific socialism, but
which did not satisfy Bogdanov. Empiriomonism, Bogdanov’s neo-Positivist epistemology, led him away from violent revolution
and toward a proletarian cultural revolution. 相似文献
15.
16.
17.
18.
Anne Jaap Jacobson 《Metaphilosophy》1989,20(3-4):391-395
19.
Epistemology and probability 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
Probability is sometimes regarded as a universal panacea for epistemology. It has been supposed that the rationality of belief is almost entirely a matter of probabilities. Unfortunately, those philosophers who have thought about this most extensively have tended to be probability theorists first, and epistemologists only secondarily. In my estimation, this has tended to make them insensitive to the complexities exhibited by epistemic justification. In this paper I propose to turn the tables. I begin by laying out some rather simple and uncontroversial features of the structure of epistemic justification, and then go on to ask what we can conclude about the connection between epistemology and probability in the light of those features. My conclusion is that probability plays no central role in epistemology. This is not to say that probability plays no role at all. In the course of the investigation, I defend a pair of probabilistic acceptance rules which enable us, under some circumstances, to arrive at justified belief on the basis of high probability. But these rules are of quite limited scope. The effect of there being such rules is merely that probability provides one source for justified belief, on a par with perception, memory, etc. There is no way probability can provide a universal cure for all our epistemological ills. 相似文献
20.