论器官资源的开拓与公平分配

器官移植在我国正处于快速发展阶段,目前除技术层面的问题外,供体数量严重不足和分配不公的问题也十分突出.本文对我国器官资源短缺原因、器官移植立法的迫切性、器官移植市场的规范化引导等问题做了全面论述,尤其对如何建立可靠的供体库和器官分配公平性的实现等问题做了较为深入细致的探讨.     

器官移植供体公平分配问题的初步研究

随着器官移植技术的飞速发展,供体器官严重缺乏的问题日益突出,在供需矛盾严重失衡的情况下,如何保障供体器官的公平分配成为社会焦点.通过分析研究了目前国内外器官分配的基本情况,建议进一步完善器官移植立法和医保模式,借签国外经验建立全国性器官移植协调中心,进而实现我国供体器官的公平分配.     

器官移植道德反思——兼评器官商品化

自从器官移植技术出现以来,器官移植供体的缺乏就成为了制约其发展的瓶颈问题,而脑死亡临床诊断标准的出台为解决这个问题指明了方向。如何为脑死亡立法和器官移植立法寻求合理的道德支持是立足点,也是现代生命伦理学的热点与难点之一。以器官移植的供体来源短缺为切入点,提出了解决有关立法和寻求新的道德资源支持的一些思路与方向,坚决反对通过器官商品化来解决移植供体短缺的问题。     

器官移植道德反思--兼评器官商品化

自从器官移植技术出现以来,器官移植供体的缺乏就成为了制约其发展的瓶颈问题,而脑死亡临床诊断标准的出台为解决这个问题指明了方向.如何为脑死亡立法和器官移植立法寻求合理的道德支持是立足点,也是现代生命伦理学的热点与难点之一.以器官移植的供体来源短缺为切入点,提出了解决有关立法和寻求新的道德资源支持的一些思路与方向,坚决反对通过器官商品化来解决移植供体短缺的问题.     

公民逝世后器官捐献的伦理审查与监督

在器官移植的供体来源为尸体器官时,无器官移植资质的医院常没有针对公民逝世后器官捐献做伦理审查。基于此现状,结合国内《执业医师法》《侵权责任法》《人体器官移植条例》《医疗机构管理条例》等有关法律法规,探讨在医疗机构环境下,公民逝世前后的器官捐献伦理审查和监督制度,以进一步尊重公民的尊严和意愿,保护隐私,避免医生职务利益冲突,规范和完善公民死亡判定与器官捐献工作流程,切实维护公民权益,增进社会公众对器官捐献伦理的认识和支持。     

“人体器官捐献补偿系统”的构想及相关伦理思考

器官移植技术日趋成熟,应用日益广泛,供体器官来源不足成为推广应用这项新技术的瓶颈,适当合理的器官移植补偿是缓解这一问题的方法之一。建立一套符合医学伦理学原则且行之有效的人体器官捐献补偿系统有助于保护器官移植供受双方的利益,缓解移植器官供体来源不足的问题。提出了"人体器官捐献补偿系统"的构想,并阐述了其伦理依据。     

"人体器官捐献补偿系统"的构想及相关伦理思考

器官移植技术日趋成熟,应用日益广泛,供体器官来源不足成为推广应用这项新技术的瓶颈,适当合理的器官移植补偿是缓解这一问题的方法之一.建立一套符合医学伦理学原则且行之有效的人体器官捐献补偿系统有助于保护器官移植供受双方的利益,缓解移植器官供体来源不足的问题.提出了"人体器官捐献补偿系统"的构想,并阐述了其伦理依据.     

国外器官捐献评估方法介绍

器官移植已成为医学上应用越来越广泛的手段之一。器官移植中器官捐献的分析评估体系作为成熟器官移植系统不可或缺的一部分,能够对器官捐献水平和做出客观的评估,包括捐献潜力,即潜在捐献者率（Potential Donors rate,,PDr）和捐献有效力,即实际捐献者率（Actual Donors rate,ADr）（单位：per million population,pmp）。本文将介绍通过对多国器官捐献评估方法进行分析、总结得出器官捐献中供体评估的主体方法,包括流程、分析方法、适用范围及其积极意义等,希望可以利于我国研究。     

中国器官捐献立法完善的若干意见

《人体器官移植条例》颁布已有十余载,虽解决了器官捐献无法可依的问题,但因其内容不完备及严格的条件限制,已成为我国器官捐献发展的障碍。从人体器官捐献存在的主要问题及立法现状入手,借鉴国外器官捐献立法现状,论述该条例中器官捐献内容存在的问题,提出完善我国器官捐献的三条建议:(1)出台专门的《人体器官捐献法》;(2)从扩大活体器官捐献供体范围、适当放宽遗体器官捐献条件、建立器官捐献的有效激励机制、规范器官分配原则6个方面完善《人体器官移植条例》;(3)明确脑死亡标准,确立脑死亡立法。     

我国器官移植中供体不足的原因分析及对策

器官移植对于挽救晚期脏器功能衰竭病人的生命具有极其重要的意义,我国器官移植起步较晚,多种因素限制器官移植的发展,其中供体不足是关键因素之一.分析器官移植中供体不足的原因,认为冲破传统观念的束缚,加大宣传力度,加快立法步伐是我国器官移植中供体不足亟待解决的问题.     

《人体器官移植条例》颁布后面临的问题与对策

《人体器官移植条例》规范引导着我国器官移植健康发展,然而,随着《条例》对器官移植供、受者条件的严格限制,尸体供器官数量迅速下降,亲属活体移植逐步占据主导地位,由此引发一系列问题。结合《条例》,就器官来源短缺、保障活体供者安全、亲属活体供者选择和器官移植伦理委员会作用等问题做出较详细的分析,提出解决方法和对策。     

活体器官移植中的矛与盾

随着临床医学的发展和免疫隔离技术的开发利用,器官移植目前已经被公认为是治疗终末期疾病的一个临床选择,本文综述器官移植中供体短缺与活体器官移植的优势与风险、活体器官移植后抗排斥与防治感染的问题以及哲学思想在器官移植诊疗过程中的指导作用。     

老龄活体供肾移植的临床应用

为缓解供体器官的严重短缺,老龄活体供肾移植逐渐成为一种可以接受的对策。老龄活体供肾移植有其特殊性并且更易于引发伦理争论。本文简要介绍此问题的研究现状,并就若干社会伦理学问题展开讨论。     

我国人体器官移植的社会支持系统研究

供体来源不足严重制约了我国器官移植事业的发展。有鉴于此,建立一个非技术的人体器官移植的社会支持系统对促进我国器官移植事业的发展将具有重要意义。通过对该系统各组成部分如法律法规系统、组织管理系统、宣传教育系统、补偿系统的研究,旨在对我国器官移植事业的发展有所裨益。     

Death anxiety,altruism, self‐efficacy,and organ donation intention among Japanese college students: A moderated mediation analysis

The shortage of organs for transplantation in Japan has alerted health professionals to the low organ donation rate among Japanese people. The unique cultural view of death and altruism has been suggested leading to their low intent to donate cadaveric organs. A cross‐sectional survey was conducted in Japan to investigate the interplay of death anxiety, altruism, and self‐efficacy in influencing Japanese college students' intention to sign donor cards, in order to mobilise this large potential source of organ donors in the future. Six hundred and seven Japanese non‐donor card signers voluntarily completed a self‐administered questionnaire. The results of mediation and moderated mediation analyses with bootstrap approach suggest that death anxiety indirectly hinders Japanese people's intention to become a donor card signer through lowering of self‐efficacy, while altruism intensifies the positive impact of self‐efficacy on signing intention. These findings provide useful insights for organ procurement organisations seeking behavioural change not only in Japan but also in multi‐ethnic societies with a substantial Japanese population.     

Knowledge and attitudes of Polish university students toward organ donation and transplantation

Although the number of patients needing organ transplantation systematically increases, recent years have seen a considerable shortage of donors. The level of knowledge and attitudes toward donation are critical factors in achieving the required balance between supply and demand. This pilot study assessed the knowledge, opinions, and behaviors related to organ donation and transplantation among 625 students representing eight different fields of study from the University of Rzeszow in south-eastern Poland. Although the participants provided evidence of knowledge about human organ donation and transplantation, they were aware of the main organs of the human body for potential transplants, and generally showed positive attitudes; only 24% of the subjects indicated their willingness to register as a donor; only 3% stated that they had already registered and had a donor card. The findings suggest that good intentions do not translate into action and that Poland needs to develop a nation-wide, up-to-date, and youth-oriented health education program that builds on favorable attitudes toward organ donation and transplantation.     

Earning points for moral behavior: organ allocation based on reciprocity

Anticipating the reevaluation of the Dutch organ procurement system, in late 2003 the Rathenau Institute published a study entitled 'Gift or Contribution?' In this study, the author, Govert den Hartogh, carries out a thorough moral analysis of the problem of organ shortage and fair allocation of organs. He suggests there should be a change in mentality whereby organ donation is no longer viewed in terms of charity and the volunteer spirit, but rather in terms of duty and reciprocity. The procurement and allocation of donor organs should be seen as a system of mutually assured help. Fair allocation would imply to give priority to those who recognize and comply with their duty: the registered donors. The idea of viewing organ donation as an undertaking involving mutual benefit rather than as a matter of charity, however, is not new. Notwithstanding the fact that reference to charity and altruism is not required in order for the organ donation to be of moral significance, we will argue against the reciprocity-based scenario. Steering organ allocation towards those who are themselves willing to donate organs is both an ineffective and morally questionable means of attempting to counter organ shortage.     

A quasi-experimental investigation of message appeal variations on organ donor registration rates.

OBJECTIVE: Approximately 6,000 Americans die every year awaiting an organ transplant. Health promotion interventions may alleviate the shortage of viable organs by increasing the number of registered organ donors. This study is the first to evaluate the differential effectiveness of various organ donor messages in naturalistic settings. DESIGN: A 4 (Appeal)x4 (Exemplar)x4 (Location) counterbalanced quasi-experimental design was implemented. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The behavioral outcome measure was the number of individuals who registered to be organ donors at computer kiosks. RESULTS: A number of significant main effects and interactions emerged. Most notably, of the 4 different appeals (counterargument, emotional, motivating action, dissonance), counterargument was by far the most efficacious, especially in academic-type settings (library, university, community college); the emotional appeal was most successful in hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this study have implications for both organ donor investigations and health campaign research in general. Statistical interactions highlight the importance of evaluating multiple exemplars in multiple locations for each type of appeal when conducting health campaign research.     

活体肝移植的伦理学问题

目前,肝移植已成为治疗终末期肝病的有效手段,活体肝移植术部分解决了供肝短缺的问题,10多年来其发展迅速,并取得了良好的疗效,由于活体肝移植需从活的供体身上切取部分肝脏,且供体多为患者家属,故存在着供体的选择,供体的贡献与代价,患者的家庭,心理,社会等伦理等问题。因此在提高活体肝移植技术水平的同时,必须充分考虑活体肝移植的伦理学问题,遵守伦理原则,使活体肝移植不但能从技术上达到,在伦理学方面也是可行的。     

Defining the vital condition for organ donation

The issue of organ donation and of how the donor pool can or should be increased is one with significant practical, ethical and logistic implications. Here we comment on an article advocating a paradigm change in the so-called "dead donor rule". Such change would involve the societal and legal abandonment of the above rule and the introduction of mandated choice. In this commentary, we review some of the problems associated with the proposed changes as well as the problems associated with the current model. We emphasize the continuing problems with the definition of death and the physiological process of dying; we discuss the difficulties associated with a dichotomous view of death; we review the difficulties with non-beating heart donation and emphasize the current limitations of society's understanding of these complex issues. We conclude that public education remains the best approach and that such education should not be merely promotion of a particular ideology but honest debate of what is socially and morally acceptable and appropriate given the changes in vital organ support technology and the need to respect patient autonomy.