共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
2.
Rainer Holm-Hadulla 《Psychotherapeut》1996,41(6):355-360
3.
Reinhard Schulz 《Journal for General Philosophy of Science》1999,30(2):365-378
Representing and Reconstructing: A Hermeneutical Reply to Ian Hacking. Hacking published in 1983 Representing and Intervening
which has provoked, particularly in the US, the so called realism/anti-realism debate which is still alive today. He lays
claim to anti-realism for theory and to realism for the experiment. Following him, only that which can be used for manipulating
something (e.g., the path of an electon) is realistic. H. Putnam is a severe critic of this dualism. In my paper I am going
to take the Hacking-Putnam controversy as a starting-point for the problem about the determination of the relation between
theory and experiment in the natural sciences. I shall then follow M. Schlick's discussion of this problem and the current
solution to the problem as offered by H. Pietschmann. The differing interpretation of Kant according to the three perspectives
shall be the guideline for the argumentation. The goal of my argumentation is that theory and experiment do not live their
own lives, that in experimenting one always continues traditional chains of action, and that natural science cannot be regarded
independently of the life world it takes place in. This insight into the representing and reconstructing overturns in natural
science, due to the necessity of human decisions, opens up their hermeneutical dimension.
This revised version was published online in August 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date. 相似文献
4.
5.
Dietrich Böhler 《Man and World》1978,11(1-2):131-164
Ohne ZusammenfassungDieser Aufsatz ist dem Berliner Germanisten Alfred Kelletat in dankbarer Verehrung gewidmet. 相似文献
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
A. R. Luria 《Psychological research》1929,12(1):127-179
Ohne Zusammenfassung
Mit 40 Abbildungen im Text. 相似文献
11.
12.
Andreas Kamlah 《Journal for General Philosophy of Science》1981,12(1):138-162
13.
Peter Janich 《Journal for General Philosophy of Science》1984,15(1):122-141
14.
15.
Dr. Wilhelm Drey 《Psychological research》1953,24(3):267-298
Ohne ZusammenfassungIn dankbarer Erinnerung an meinen verehrten Münchener Lehrer Kurt Huber, dessen frühzeitigen gewaltsamen Tod (13. 7. 43) wir noch immer beklagen. Die Arbeit entsprang einer seiner letzten wissenschaftlichen Anregungen. 相似文献
16.
17.
18.
Gottfried gabriel 《Erkenntnis》2000,52(2):185-198
Goodman's most important contribution to philosophy seems to be his analysis of the relation between facts of science and fictions of art. His view can be seen as a kind of complementary pluralism. That is to say, science and art are two complementary forms of achieving cognition. This position overcame the positivistic view (of his teacher Carnap) according to which the value of art is restricted to the non-cognitive function of expressing emotions. In this paper I compare some of Goodman's fundamental ideas – especially his central conception of exemplification – with their counterparts in Baumgarten, Kant, and Cassirer. Based on this comparison I argue against the tendency to regard analytic and continental philosophy as two completely separated traditions. 相似文献
19.
20.
Webers Idealtypus Als Methode Zur Bestimmung Des Begriffsinhaltes Theoretischer Begriffe in Den Kulturwissenschaften 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
Gertrude Hirsch Hadorn 《Journal for General Philosophy of Science》1997,28(2):275-296
Weber's Ideal Type as a Method of Forming the Content of Theoretical Concepts in Social Sciences}. Max Weber introduced the ideal type as the specific method of concept formation in social sciences. But the ideal type is not established in social research. Instead, authors in philosophy of science until today try to reconstruct and interpret what Weber said about ideal types as well as what might be their importance in Weber's social theory. The thesis of the following paper is that the difficulties in understanding Weber's ideal types are linked with Weber's intensional logic of concept formation. The thesis is defended in three steps. The first step deals with Weber's understanding of what is a scientific question in cultural sciences. Secondly Weber's critical arguments against positivism, hegelianism and historism are worked out. Thirdly, Weber's method of concept formation is reconstructed. 相似文献