Exclusivist or Universalist? Origen the ‘Wise Steward of the Word’ (CommRom. V.1.7) and the Issue of Genre

Abstract: This article explores the issue of Origen's universalism. It identifies the two seemingly self‐contradictory strands in the Origen corpus which have led to dual pictures of Origen as either an arch‐universalist or an exclusivist. To make sense of this, the hermeneutical key of CommRom. V.1.7 (in which Origen states Paul covers over his universalism to be a ‘wise steward of the word’) is applied to Origen's own texts. Identifying the different genres in Origen's works, it is clear that different stances on universalism are taken dependent upon the genre of his work. The question is posed as to whether such a move in theology is justifiable and biblical.     

Bearing Witness to the Ethics and Politics of Suffering: J. M. Coetzee’s <Emphasis Type="Italic">Disgrace</Emphasis>, Inconsolable Mourning,and the Task of Educators

How can educators and their students interrogate the ethics and politics of suffering in ways that do not create fixed and totalized narratives from the past? In responding to this question, this essay draws on J. M. Coeetze’s Disgrace, and discusses how this novel constitutes a crucial site for bearing witness to the suffering engendered by apartheid through inventing new forms of mourning and community. The anti-historicist stance of the novel is grounded on the notion that bearing witness to suffering without betraying it means refusing to represent it, that is, refusing to translate history and speak of it; instead, the novel’s characters remain inconsolable before history. The essay builds on these ideas and considers whether educators and their students need to (re)learn the limits of historicism in comprehending conflict, oppression, otherness and suffering; also, it examines the educational implications of such a pedagogical task.     

War and the Christian Conscience: Where Do You Stand? – Joseph J. Fahey

Book reviewed: War and the Christian Conscience: Where Do You Stand? , Joseph J. Fahey, Orbis Press 2005 (1‐57075‐583‐3), xviii + 205 pp., pb $15.00     

Contributions to the history of psychology: LXXXIII. J.E. Purkinje and Mathias Klotz: who first described "the phenomenon"?

In 1825 Purkinje described the effects of increasing ambient illumination at early dawn, beginning with darkness, on the perception of spectral colors. The blues were seen first. When reds became visible, they appeared less bright than the blues. The usually dependable Brockhaus Encyclopedia stated (1972) that the phenomenon was described in 1816 by Mathias Klotz and rediscovered ("erneut entdeckt") by Purkinje. As it turns out, Klotz correctly described the effects of low ambient illumination on the relative brightness but his report on visibility contradicts Purkinje's observations, amply confirmed by subsequent investigators and known, in fact, prior to Purkinje's report.     

Perceptions of Female and Male Managers in the 1990s: Plus ça change . . .

Sex Roles - Despite an increase in the number of womenmanagers, women frequently have difficulty advancing toupper levels of management. Researchers such as V . E.Schein [(1973), “The...     

Freedom and the Dynamics of the Self and the ‘Other’; Re-constructing the Debate Between Tagore and Gandhi

Tagore and Gandhi shared a relationship across 26 years. They argued about many things including the means for the attainment of swaraj/freedom. In terms of this central concern with the nature of freedom they came fairly close to an issue that has perhaps dominated the (European) Enlightenment. For the Enlightenment has sought to clarify what is meant by individual freedom and attempted to secure such freedom to the individual. This article argues that the Tagore-Gandhi debate can perhaps be reconstructed around the issue of freedom and the collective. Gandhi was able to employ the idea of collective action with conceptual and practical ease. He seemed to have felt no tension between individual freedom and the notion of the collective of which an individual becomes a part in his/her attempt to deal with the contending ‘other’ and secure his /her freedom/swaraj. To understand Tagore’s opposition to the Gandhian idea of swaraj this article draws a philosophical parallel between Tagore and Kant on individual freedom as primarily the freedom to reason. Tagore’s argument seemed to have centered on the insight that the location of the individual in a collective hypostatized self in order to protect his or her freedom from ‘others’ reaffirms the self other divide. The insider-outsider exclusionary dynamics that are generated not only consolidate such distinctions as external to (and outside of) the collective self, but they also initiate internal dynamics that create the ‘silenced insider.’