共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
Shared service centers and professional employability 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
This paper presents case study evidence of evolutionary changes in business support functions resulting in a fundamental hollowing out of the professional space over time and distance, creating the ‘hourglass’ profession. In an IT-enabled, boundaryless world, many professional activities can now be undertaken, in the manner of the Martini slogan, ‘any time, any place, anywhere’.This paper aims:
?
To investigate the shared service center as an emerging organizational form with the potential to drive fundamental change in the nature and location of professional work. ?
To explore the impact of these changes for individual professional workers, and to highlight the need for a greater focus on individual employability as the driver of an overall career trajectory.
16.
17.
《Philosophical Investigations》2006,29(4):403-406
EDITOR | D.Z. PHILLIPS, University of Wales, Swansea and Claremont Graduate University |
EDITORIAL ADDRESS | Department of Philosophy University of Wales, Swansea Singleton Park, Swansea, SA2 8PP |
ASSOCIATE EDITORS | David Cockburn, University of Wales, Lampeter |
Peter Hacker, St John's College, Oxford | |
Walford Gealy, University of Wales, Aberystwyth | |
Laurence Goldstein, University of Hong Kong | |
Peter Lewis, University of Edinburgh | |
Marie McGinn, University of York | |
H.O. Mounce, University of Wales, Swansea | |
Stephen Mulhall, New College, Oxford | |
Anthony Palmer, University of Southampton | |
Guy Stock, University of Dundee, Scotland | |
Mario von der Ruhr, University of Wales, Swansea | |
Michael Weston, University of Essex |
18.
Rolf Loeber Dustin A. Pardini Alison Hipwell Magda Stouthamer-Loeber Kate Keenan Mark A. Sembower 《Journal of abnormal child psychology》2009,37(6):777-791
Relatively little is known about the factor structure of disruptive behavior among preadolescent girls. The present study
reports on exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses of disruptive girl behavior over four successive data waves as rated
by parents and teachers in a large, representative community sample of girls (N = 2,451). Five factors were identified from parent ratings (oppositional behavior/conduct problems, inattention, hyperactivity/impulsivity,
relational aggression, and callous-unemotional behaviors), and four factors were identified derived from teacher ratings (oppositional
behavior/conduct problems/callous-unemotional behaviors, inattention, hyperactivityimpulsivity, and relational aggression).
There was a high degree of consistency of items loading on equivalent factors across parent and teacher ratings. Year-to-year
stability of factors between ages five and 12 was high for parent ratings (ICC = 0.70 to 0.88), and slightly lower for teacher
ratings (ICC = 0.56 to 0.83). These findings are discussed in terms of possible adjustment to the criteria for children's
disruptive behavior disorders found in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders.
相似文献
Rolf Loeber (Corresponding author)Email: |
Dustin A. PardiniEmail: |
Alison HipwellEmail: |
Magda Stouthamer-LoeberEmail: |
Kate KeenanEmail: |
Mark A. SembowerEmail: |
19.
In this introduction we discuss the motivation behind the workshop “Towards a New Epistemology of Mathematics” of which this
special issue constitutes the proceedings. We elaborate on historical and empirical aspects of the desired new epistemology,
connect it to the public image of mathematics, and give a summary and an introduction to the contributions to this issue.
相似文献
Bernd BuldtEmail: |
Benedikt L?we (Corresponding author)Email: |
Thomas MüllerEmail: |
20.
《International Journal of Selection & Assessment》2005,13(2):178-178
In the article by N. Schmitt, F.L. Oswald, B.H. Kim, M.A. Gillespie and L.J. Ramsay entitled “The Impact of Justice and Self‐serving Bias Explanation of the Perceived Fairness of Different Types of Selection Tests” in Volume 12, Numbers 1/2 of International Journal of Selection and Assessment, six means that appear in Table 6 Table 6. Subgroup Reactions to Biodata, Situational Judgment Inventory, and ACT/SAT Measures
Measure | Group | Fairness | Relevance | Performance Belief | Comp. Performance | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | ||
Biodata | Cauc. | 2.35 | .84 | 3.32 | .84 | 3.79 | .76 | 3.04 | .63 |
Afr.Am. | 2.42 | .90 | 3.08 | .88 | 3.80 | .65 | 3.03 | .61 | |
His.Am. | 2.65 | .80 | 3.29 | .92 | 4.33 | .75 | 3.23 | .75 | |
Asian | 2.36 | .86 | 3.25 | .82 | 3.79 | .80 | 3.00 | .83 | |
Male | 2.33 | .91 | 3.24 | .89 | 3.76 | .74 | 3.07 | .67 | |
Female | 2.39 | .85 | 3.30 | .84 | 3.81 | .75 | 3.04 | .65 | |
ACT/SAT | Cauc. | 3.25 | .97 | 3.08 | .88 | 3.33 | 1.03 | 3.01 | 1.00 |
Afr.Am. | 2.65 | 1.01 | 2.90 | .81 | 2.97 | .97 | 2.72 | .90 | |
His.Am. | 2.68 | .99 | 2.84 | .98 | 2.70 | .90 | 2.66 | .96 | |
Asian | 3.29 | 1.04 | 3.09 | .98 | 3.00 | 1.03 | 2.59 | .97 | |
Male | 3.39 | .98 | 3.20 | .85 | 3.40 | 1.07 | 3.24 | 1.02 | |
Female | 3.08 | .99 | 2.99 | .88 | 3.20 | 1.01 | 2.84 | .96 | |
SJI | Cauc. | 2.18 | .81 | 3.09 | .85 | 3.54 | .70 | 2.99 | .60 |
Afr.Am. | 2.19 | .81 | 3.03 | .79 | 3.47 | .83 | 2.90 | .58 | |
His.Am. | 2.10 | .83 | 3.22 | 1.10 | 3.70 | .90 | 2.90 | .28 | |
Asian | 2.10 | 1.00 | 2.94 | .92 | 3.60 | .83 | 2.97 | .66 | |
Male | 2.12 | .86 | 3.03 | .85 | 3.40 | .73 | 2.95 | .69 | |
Female | 2.21 | .82 | 3.09 | .84 | 3.57 | .73 | 2.99 | .56 |
- Note: Cauc., Caucasian; Afr.Am., African American; His.Am., Hispanic American; Asian, Asian American.