Effects of Posttraining Administration of Glucose on Retention of a Habituation Response in Mice: Participation of a Central Cholinergic Mechanism

Male Swiss mice were allowed to explore a novel environment, provided by an open-field activity chamber, for 10 min. The procedure was repeated twice with a 24-h interval. The difference in the exploratory activity between the first (training) and the second (testing) exposures to the chamber was taken as an index of retention of this habituation task. Posttraining intraperitoneal administration of glucose (10–300 mg/kg) enhanced retention in a dose-related manner, although only the dose of 30 mg/kg of glucose produced significant effects. Thus, the dose–response curve adopted an inverted U-shaped form. Glucose (30 mg/kg) given to untrained mice did not modify their exploratory performance when recorded 24 h later. The effects of glucose on retention were time-dependent, suggesting an action on memory storage. The memory-improving actions of glucose were prevented by the simultaneous administration of both the central acting muscarinic cholinergic antagonist atropine (0.5 mg/kg) and by the central acting nicotinic cholinergic antagonist mecamylamine (5 mg/kg). In contrast, neither methylatropine (0.5 mg/kg), a peripherally acting muscarinic receptor blocker, nor hexamethonium (5 mg/kg), a peripherally acting nicotinic receptor blocker, prevented the effects of glucose on retention. Low subeffective doses of glucose (10 mg/kg) and the central anticholinesterase physostigmine (35 μg/kg), but not neostigmine (35 μg/kg), given together, act synergistically and facilitated retention. We suggest that glucose modulates memory storage of one form of learning elicited by stimuli repeatedly presented without reinforcement, probably through an enhancement of brain acetylcholine synthesis and/or its release.     

Effects of Posttraining Administration of Insulin on Retention of a Habituation Response in Mice: Participation of a Central Cholinergic Mechanism

Male Swiss mice were allowed to explore a novel environment, provided by an open-field activity chamber for a 10-min period. The procedure was repeated twice within a 24-h interval. The difference in the exploratory activity between the first (training) and the second exposure (testing) to the chamber was taken as an index of retention of this habituation task. Posttraining intraperitoneal administration of insulin (8, 20, or 80 IU/kg) impaired retention in a dose-related manner, although only the dose of 20 IU/kg of insulin produced significant effects. Thus, the dose–response curve adopted a U-shaped form. Insulin (20 IU/kg) given to untrained mice did not modify their exploratory performance when recorded 24 h later. The effects of insulin on retention were time dependent, suggesting an action on memory storage. An ineffective dose (8 IU/kg) of insulin given together with an ineffective dose of a central acting muscarinic cholinergic antagonist atropine (0.5 mg/kg) or with a central acting nicotinic cholinergic antagonist mecamylamine (5 mg/kg) interacted to impair retention. In contrast, neither methylatropine (0.5 mg/kg), a peripherally acting muscarinic receptor blocker, nor hexamethonium (5 mg/kg), a peripherally acting nicotinic receptor blocker, interacted with the subeffective dose of insulin on retention. The impairing effects of insulin (20 IU/kg) on retention were reversed by the simultaneous administration of physostigmine (70 μg/kg) but not neostigmine (70 μg/kg). We suggest that insulin impairs memory storage of one form of learning elicited by stimuli repeatedly presented without reinforcement, probably through a decrement of brain acetylcholine synthesis.     

Enhancement of the Post-training Cholinergic Tone Antagonizes the Impairment of Retention Induced by a Nitric Oxide Synthase Inhibitor in Mice

The present experiments examined the role of the central cholinergic system in the memory impairment induced by post-training administration of a nitric oxide synthase (NOS) inhibitor in mice. Male Swiss mice received a one-trial inhibitory avoidance training (0.8 mA, 50 Hz, 1-s footshock) followed immediately by an ip injection of the NOS inhibitor -N^G-nitroarginine methyl ester ( -NAME; 100 mg/kg). Retention (cut-off time, 300 s) was tested 48 h after training. The administration of -NAME results in memory impairment for the inhibitory avoidance task. The effects of -NAME (100 mg/kg, ip) on retention were reversed in a dose-related manner by the centrally acting anticholinesterase physostigmine (35, 70, or 150 μg/kg, sc) administered 30 min after the NOS inhibitor. Further, -NAME (100 mg/kg, ip)-induced memory impairment was completely antagonized by the centrally acting muscarinic cholinergic agonist oxotremorine (OTM; 25, 50, or 100 μg/kg, sc) when given 30 min after -NAME. The peripherally acting anticholinesterase neostigmine (150 μg/kg, sc) did not modify the memory-impairing effects of -NAME. These findings suggest that the memory impairment following post-training administration of a NOS inhibitor is mediated, at least in part, by a reduction of the activity of central muscarinic cholinergic mechanisms and are consistent with our previous view that nitric oxide may be involved in post-training neural processes underlying the storage of newly acquired information.     

The enhancement of retention induced by vasopressin in mice may be mediated by an activation of central nicotinic cholinergic mechanisms.

Immediate post-training subcutaneous administration of lysine vasopressin (LVP, 0.003-1.00 microgram/kg) enhanced retention, whereas the vasopressin antagonist AAVP (0.01-0.30 microgram/kg) impaired it, in male Swiss mice tested 48 h after training in an inhibitory avoidance task. Both effects were dose-dependent. Neither LVP nor AAVP affected response latencies in mice not given the footshock on the training trial. The simultaneous administration of AAVP at a dose (0.01 microgram/kg) which had no effect on retention shifted the dose-response curve of LVP to the right. Nicotine (1.0-30.0 micrograms/kg, sc), a central nicotinic cholinergic agonist, also facilitated retention in a dose-related manner without affecting the retention performance of unshocked mice. The effect of nicotine was prevented by the central acting nicotinic cholinergic receptor antagonist mecamylamine (5 mg/kg, sc.). In contrast, neither hexamethonium (5 mg/kg, sc), a peripheral acting nicotinic receptor blocker, nor atropine (0.5 mg/kg, sc) or methylatropine (0.5 mg/kg, sc), two anticholinergic drugs which are known to act on muscarinic cholinergic receptors, prevented the effect of post-training nicotine. The effects of LVP and nicotine were time-dependent, suggesting that both treatments enhanced retention by influencing post-training processes involved in memory storage. Low doses of nicotine (1.50 microgram/kg, sc) or the central anticholinesterase physostigmine (35 micrograms/kg, sc) and LVP (0.003 microgram/kg, sc), which had no effect on retention when administered alone, produced a synergistic interaction when given together following training. The influence of LVP (0.03 microgram/kg, sc) on retention was prevented not only by AAVP (0.01 microgram/kg, sc) but also by mecamylamine (5 mg/kg, sc), whereas the effects of nicotine (10.0 micrograms/kg, sc) were prevented only by mecamylamine. These results suggest that the enhancement of retention induced by vasopressin is probably due to an activation of central nicotinic cholinergic mechanisms which are critical for memory formation.     

Pharmacological evidence of a central effect of naltrexone, morphine, and beta-endorphin and a peripheral effect of met- and leu-enkephalin on retention of an inhibitory response in mice

Immediate post-training administration of the central acting opioid receptor antagonist naltrexone (0.01-1.00 mg/kg) facilitated 48-h retention of a one-trial inhibitory avoidance task. An inverted-U dose-response curve was obtained. In this dose range naltrexone did not significantly affect response latencies of mice not given a footshock during the training. However, higher doses of naltrexone (3.0 and 10.0 mg/kg) increased latencies of both shocked and unshocked mice. The peripheral-acting opioid receptor blocker, naltrexone methyl bromide (MR 2263) (0.01-10.00 mg/kg), did not significantly influence retention latencies of either shocked or unshocked mice. Further, MR 2263 (0.1, 1.0, or 10.0 mg/kg) did not block the retention impairment produced by concurrently administered morphine (3.0 mg/kg) or beta-endorphin (0.1 microgram/kg). These findings indicate that the effect of these agonists on memory are not due to a peripheral influence. However, MR 2263 does prevent the memory-impairing effect of both metenkephalin (1.0 microgram/kg) and leu-enkephalin (0.3 microgram/kg) on retention. Those results suggest that enkephalins affect retention through influences initiated peripherally. Thus, different sites and mechanisms of action for beta-endorphin and the enkephalins are proposed.     

AF-DX 116, a Presynaptic Muscarinic Receptor Antagonist, Potentiates the Effects of Glucose and Reverses the Effects of Insulin on Memory

Male Swiss mice were tested 24 h after training in a one-trial step-through inhibitory avoidance task. Low subeffective doses of -(+)-glucose (10 mg/kg, ip), but not its stereoisomer -(−)-glucose (30 mg/kg, ip), administered immediately after training, and AF-DX 116 (0.3 mg/kg, ip), a presynaptic muscarinic receptor antagonist, given 10 min after training, interact to improve retention. Insulin (8 IU/kg, ip) impaired retention when injected immediately after training, and the effects were reversed, in a dose-related manner, by AF-DX 116 (0.3, 1.0, or 3.0 mg/kg, ip) administered 10 min following insulin. Since AF-DX 116 possibly blocks autoreceptors mediating the inhibition of acetylcholine release from cholinergic nerve terminals, the present data support the view that changes in the central nervous system glucose availability, subsequent to modification of circulating glucose levels, influence the activity of central cholinergic mechanisms involved in memory storage of an inhibitory avoidance response in mice.     

Opioid peptidergic systems modulate the activity of beta-adrenergic mechanisms during memory consolidation processes

Post-training administration of the opioid receptor antagonist naloxone (0.1 mg/kg) facilitated 48-hr retention, in mice, of a one-trial step-through inhibitory avoidance response. The naloxone-induced memory facilitation was blocked in animals given the selective brain-noradrenergic neurotoxin DSP4 (N-(2-chloroethyl)-N-ethyl-2-bromobenzylamine) (50.0 mg/kg, ip) 7 days before training. Pretreatment with the norepinephrine-uptake inhibitor desmethylimipramine (10.0 mg/kg, ip, 30 min), but not with the serotonin-uptake inhibitor fluoxetine (5.0 mg/kg, ip, 30 min), prevented this antagonism. The simultaneous administration of the central beta-adrenoceptor blocker l-propranolol (2.0 mg/kg, ip), also blocked the effects of naloxone on memory. The effects of naloxone were not blocked by d-propranolol (2.0 mg/kg, ip), the peripheral beta-adrenoceptor blocker sotalol (2.0 mg/kg, ip), the alpha-adrenoceptor blocker phenoxybenzamine (10.0 mg/kg, ip), or the predominantly peripheral alpha-adrenoceptor blocker phentolamine (10.0 mg/kg, ip). These findings suggest that central beta-adrenergic mechanisms are involved in the effects of naloxone on memory. Naloxone (0.1 mg/kg, ip) potentiated the effects of the central beta-adrenoceptor agonist clenbuterol (0.001-1.00 mg/kg, ip), which, when administered alone, facilitates or impairs retention as a function of the dose injected. The simultaneous administration of beta-endorphin (0.1 micrograms/kg, ip) exerted effects opposite to those elicited by naloxone, that is, shifted the dose-response curve of clenbuterol to the right. Considered together, these findings are consistent with the view that the facilitatory action of naloxone on memory results from the release of central beta-adrenergic mechanisms from an inhibition induced by opioid peptides released during or immediately after training.     

Memory-modulatory effects of centrally acting noradrenergic drugs: possible involvement of brain cholinergic mechanisms.

Post-training administration of the centrally acting muscarinic agonist oxotremorine (50.0 microgram/kg, ip) facilitated 48-hr retention, in mice, of a one-trial step-through inhibitory avoidance response. Oxotremorine-induced memory facilitation was not prevented by the simultaneous post-training administration of the central beta-adrenoceptor antagonist propranolol (2.0 mg/kg, ip). In contrast, post-training administration of atropine (0.5 mg/kg, ip), but not methylatropine (0.5 mg/kg, ip), completely prevented the facilitatory effects of the central beta-adrenoceptor agonist clenbuterol (30.0 micrograms/kg, ip) on retention. Low subeffective doses of clenbuterol (3.0 micrograms/kg, ip) and oxotremorine (6.25 or 12.5 micrograms/kg, ip) potentiated their effects and facilitated retention when given simultaneously immediately post-training. These results suggest that clenbuterol may induce memory facilitation through an increase of the release of acetylcholine in the brain. Post-training administration of a high dose of clenbuterol (1.0 mg/kg, ip) significantly impaired retention. Clenbuterol (1.0 mg/kg, ip)-induced impairment of retention was completely prevented by simultaneous post-training administration of oxotremorine (6.25, 12.5, or 50.0 micrograms/kg, ip). The centrally acting anticholinesterase physostigmine (21.5 or 68.0 micrograms/kg, ip) partially prevented clenbuterol-induced impairment of memory. The peripherally acting anticholinesterase neostigmine (68.0 micrograms/kg, ip) modified neither retention nor the amnestic effects of clenbuterol. Considered together, these findings are consistent with the view that brain muscarinic cholinergic mechanisms are involved in both the facilitatory and impairing effect of post-training clenbuterol on the modulation of memory storage.     

Facilitation of inhibitory avoidance by hypertonic saline is reversed by a vasopressin and a nicotinic antagonist

Hypertonic saline (1 ml of 0.25, 0.50, and 1.00 M NaCl, ip) facilitated retention of a one-trial, step-through inhibitory avoidance task when injected into male Swiss mice 10 min after training, as indicated by retention performance 48 h later. A similar result was obtained after a subcutaneous injection of lysine vasopressin (LVP, 0.03 microgram/kg). Neither hypertonic saline nor LVP modified latencies to step-through of mice that had not received a footshock during training. The enhancement of retention produced both by hypertonic saline and by LVP was prevented by the vasopressin receptor antagonist AAVP (0.01 microgram/kg, sc) given after training, but 10 min before the treatments. The effect of hypertonic saline was also prevented by the central acting cholinergic nicotinic receptor antagonist mecamylamine (5 mg/kg, sc). On the contrary, neither hexamethonium (5 mg/kg, sc), a peripheral acting nicotinic receptor blocker, nor atropine (0.5 mg/kg, sc) or methylatropine (0.5 mg/kg, sc), two anticholinergic drugs which are known to act on cholinergic muscarinic receptors, prevented the effect of post-training hypertonic saline. These results suggest that a peripheral osmotic stimulus, probably through an endogenous release of vasopressin, may be behaviorally significant, and are consistent with the view that vasopressin may modulate the activity of central cholinergic nicotinic mechanisms which are critical for the behavioral change observed.     

Involvement of central cholinergic mechanisms in the effects of oxytocin and an oxytocin receptor antagonist on retention performance in mice

Oxytocin (OT, 0.10 microg/kg, sc) impaired retention of a one-trial step-through inhibitory avoidance task when injected into male Swiss mice 10 min after training, as indicated by retention performance 48 h later. In contrast, the immediate post-training administration of the putative oxytocin receptor antagonist d(CH(2))(5)[Tyr(Me)(2), Thr(4), Thy-NH(9)(2)] OVT (AOT, 0.30 microg/kg, sc) significantly enhanced retention performance. Neither OT nor AOT affected response latencies in mice not given footshock on the training trial, and neither the impairing effects of OT nor the enhancing effects of AOT were seen when the training-treatment interval was 180 min, suggesting that both treatments influenced memory storage. The effects of OT (0.10 microg/kg, sc) on retention were prevented by AOT (0.03 microg/kg, sc) given immediately after training, but 10 min prior to OT treatment. The central acting anticholinesterase physostigmine (35, 70, or 150 microg/kg, i.p.), but not its quaternary analogue neostigmine (150 microg/kg, i.p.), reversed the impairment of retention performance induced by OT, whereas low subeffective doses of the centrally active muscarinic cholinergic antagonist atropine (0.5 mg/kg, i.p.) or the central acting nicotinic cholinergic antagonist mecamylamine (5 mg/kg, i.p.), but not methylatropine (0.5 mg/kg, i.p.) or hexamethonium (5 mg/kg, i.p.) prevented the enhancement of retention performance caused by AOT. We suggest that oxytocin negatively modulates the activity of central cholinergic mechanisms during the posttraining period that follows an aversively motivated learning experience, leading to an impairment of retention performance of the inhibitory avoidance response.     

Scopolamine effects on memory retention in mice: a model of dementia?

Scopolamine-treated normal young human subjects exhibit memory dysfunctions analogous to those observed in demented patients. The dysfunctions are reversible by physostigmine but not by d-amphetamine which suggests that the memory impairment is specifically related to reduced cholinergic transmission caused by scopolamine. Scopolamine-induced amnesia has been proposed as a model for dementia where reduced cholinergic function is the suspected cause. We report seven experiments in young adult mice which examine scopolamine's effects on memory retention and whether its amnestic effects are specifically blocked by cholinergic agonists or cholinomimetics. Young adult mice were trained to avoid footshock in a T maze and their retention tested 1 week after training. Pretraining subcutaneous injection of scopolamine improved retention scores of "undertrained" mice at a dose of 0.01 mg/kg but impaired at a dose of 0.1 mg/kg. Post-training injection showed no effect at 0.01 mg/kg, enhanced retention scores at 0.1 mg/kg, and impaired at 1.0 mg/kg. The impairment by 1.0 mg/kg was blocked by injection 45 min post-training of each of two cholinergic drugs but was also counteracted by six drugs which act upon five other neural systems (catecholamine, serotonin, glycine, GABA, and hormonal). When scopolamine was injected 40 min pretraining, and each of eight drugs was injected immediately after training, the amnestic effect of scopolamine was only partially counteracted. This suggests that scopolamine impaired acquisition, in addition to some impairment of memory processing. This was confirmed by a direct study of acquisition rates of the avoidance response; 0.1 mg/kg of scopolamine impaired acquisition. The overall results indicate that pretraining administration of scopolamine impairs learning and to some degree memory processing. Counteracting scopolamine-induced amnesia, by either pretraining or post-training drug administration, is not specific to the cholinergic system.     

Effects of the nicotinic receptor blocker mecamylamine on radial-arm maze performance in rats

Lesions of cholinergic neurons have been found by many investigators to impair choice accuracy in the radial arm maze. Because muscarinic receptor blockers, such as scopolamine, have also repeatedly been found to impair choice accuracy in the radial-arm maze, it has generally been thought that the critical effect of cholinergic lesions is the deafferentation of muscarinic receptors. The possible involvement of nicotinic receptors in the cholinergic bases of cognitive performance in the radial-arm maze has not been as well investigated. The present study examined the effects of the blockade of nicotinic receptors on performance of female Sprague-Dawley rats in the radial-arm maze. Acute administration of the the nicotinic receptor blocker, mecamylamine (10 mg/kg) was found to significantly impair radial-arm maze choice accuracy. This dose also caused a significant increase in response latency in the maze. The effect on choice behavior but not locomotor speed seemed to be due to the central effects of mecamylamine, because administration of the peripheral nicotine receptor blocker, hexamethonium (20 mg/kg), did not impair choice accuracy, even though it did increase response latency to a similar degree as the 10-mg/kg dose of mecamylamine. Lower doses of mecamylamine (2.5 and 5 mg/kg) did not impair choice accuracy. These results indicate that central nicotinic as well as muscarinic cholinergic receptors are involved with cognitive functioning.     

Effects of combined muscarinic and nicotinic blockade on choice accuracy in the radial-arm maze

Acetylcholine (ACh) systems have been found to be crucial for the maintenance of accurate cognitive performance. A great variety of studies have shown that the muscarinic ACh receptor blocker scopolamine impairs choice accuracy in the radial-arm maze. Recently, it has been found that the nicotinic ACh receptor blocker mecamylamine also impairs radial-arm maze choice accuracy. In the present study, we investigated the effects of combined administration of these two ACh blockers. Scopolamine (0.15 mg/kg) and mecamylamine (10 mg/kg) each moderately impaired choice accuracy. Combined treatment with scopolamine and mecamylamine significantly decreased choice accuracy relative to either drug alone. This combination treatment lowered choice accuracy to chance levels. These data show that nicotinic and muscarinic blockade have at least additive effects in producing an anterograde memory deficit. Concurrent blockade of these two components of ACh systems may provide a better animal model of cognitive impairments due to the loss of cholinergic neurons, such as Alzheimer's disease.     

Radial arm maze performance of mice: acquisition and atropine effects

CD-1 mice were successfully trained in a six-arm radial maze in which half of the arms were baited, a procedure which had been used to differentiate between reference and working memory. Stable performance was achieved following eight daily training sessions, as measured by decreasing running time and number of errors. This finding strengthens the foraging hypothesis as a basis for the performance of rodents in the radial maze. Acute subcutaneous administration of the cholinergic antagonist atropine sulfate (1-6 mg/kg) to trained mice produced dose-related increases in running time and working memory errors, with a slight decrease in reference memory errors. This is in agreement with other studies on the role of the cholinergic system in memory processes. The peripheral cholinergic blocker, atropine methyl nitrate (4 mg/kg), somewhat increased running time without decreasing performance accuracy. In contrast to the prolonged pharmacological and physiological effects of atropine, behavioral decrements disappeared within 3 hr. It is concluded that mice trained in the radial arm maze may be used for screening of the effects of drugs on cognitive function.     

Glucose effects on mecamylamine-induced memory deficits and decreases in locomotor activity in mice.

Peripheral glucose administration attenuates the effects of muscarinic cholinergic antagonists on several measures, including spontaneous alternation, inhibitory avoidance, and locomotor activity. The present study examined glucose interactions with mecamylamine, a nicotinic cholinergic antagonist, on these measures. Mecamylamine (5 mg/kg, sc) significantly impaired spontaneous alternation performance. Glucose (100 mg/kg, ip) administered with mecamylamine attenuated the impairment. Treatment with hexamethonium (5 and 10 mg/kg, sc), a peripheral nicotinic blocker, did not impair performance. Pretraining treatment with mecamylamine, but not hexamethonium, significantly reduced later retention latencies on inhibitory avoidance tests. Glucose, administered with mecamylamine prior to training, significantly attenuated the impaired test performance. Mecamylamine, but not hexamethonium, significantly decreased locomotor activity. In contrast to the attenuating effects of glucose on the other measures above, glucose administered with mecamylamine potentiated the decreased locomotor activity. These findings demonstrate that glucose influences the behavioral effects of a nicotinic cholinergic antagonist in a manner generally similar to that of muscarinic cholinergic antagonists, and supports previous evidence that circulating glucose interacts with central cholinergic functions.     

Mecamylamine prevents the enhancement of retention induced by lysine vasopressin in mice

Lysine vasopressin (0.03 microgram/kg, sc) enhanced retention of a one-trial, step-through inhibitory avoidance task when injected into male Swiss mice immediately post-training, as indicated by retention performance 48 h later. A low dose of the vasopressin antagonist, AAVP (0.01 microgram/kg, sc), did not significantly affect retention, whereas a higher dose (0.03 microgram/kg, sc) impaired retention. Neither lysine vasopressin nor AAVP modified latencies to step-through of mice that had not received a footshock during training. The simultaneous injection of AAVP (0.01 microgram/kg, sc) prevented the enhancement of retention induced by lysine vasopressin. The influence of lysine vasopressin on retention was antagonized by the simultaneous administration of mecamylamine (5 mg/kg, sc) but not by hexamethonium (5 mg/kg, sc), atropine (0.5 mg/kg, sc), or methylatropine (0.5 mg/kg, sc). A modulatory role of vasopressin on the activity of central cholinergic nicotinic mechanisms which participate in memory formation is suggested.     

Effects of anandamide and morphine combinations on memory consolidation in cd1 mice: involvement of dopaminergic mechanisms

In the present research the interaction between the endogenous ligand for the cannabinoid CB1 receptor anandamide (arachidonylethanolamide) and morphine in memory consolidation was investigated. Four sets of experiments were carried out with CD1 mice tested in a one-trial inhibitory avoidance task. The drugs were administered intraperitoneally after training of the animals in the apparatus. In the first set of experiments morphine (0.3 or 0.5, but not 0.15mg/kg) or anandamide (3 or 6 but not 1.5mg/kg) dose-dependently impaired memory consolidation. In the second set of experiments the administration of an otherwise ineffective dose of anandamide (1.5mg/kg) enhanced the memory impairment exerted by morphine (0.3 and 0.5mg/kg) when the drugs were injected immediately after training. In the third set of experiments the combined treatments of anandamide (1.5mg/kg) and morphine (0.5mg/kg) 2h after training were ineffective showing that the effects observed on performance following immediate posttraining administration of anandamide and morphine combinations were reflecting direct influences on memory consolidation. In the fourth set of experiments otherwise ineffective doses of the D1 DA receptor agonist SKF 38393 or the D2 DA receptor agonist LY 171555 antagonized the memory impairment produced by anandamide and morphine in combination, suggesting a possible involvement of dopaminergic mechanisms.     

Opposite effects of a single versus repeated doses of gabapentin on retention performance of an inhibitory avoidance response in mice

CF-1 male mice were trained in an inhibitory avoidance (IA) task. A single gabapentin (GBP) administration (50mg/kg, ip) immediately after training enhanced retention performance when mice were tested 8 days after training. On the contrary, when the same dose of the anticonvulsant drug was given twice a day for 7 days (repeated treatment), a significant impairment on retention performance 12h after the last injection of GBP was observed. When the retention test was delayed 7 days after the end of the repeated treatment, the retention performance was not significant different from the control group, whereas if the retention test was delayed 14 days, retention performance was higher than control group but similar to that observed when GBP was administered once immediately after training. The impairment on retention performance was correlated with a significant decrease in the high affinity choline uptake in the hippocampus at the end of the retention test. The pretest administration of the direct muscarinic cholinergic agonist oxotremorine (50 microg/kg, ip) reversed the impairment on retention performance. This reversion was prevented by the muscarinic cholinergic antagonist scopolamine (0.5 mg/kg, ip). Taken together, these results suggest that the impairment on retention performance of an IA task in mice induced by repeated administration of GBP affected memory retrieval but not memory consolidation and that this impairment may be attributable to a reduction on central cholinergic activity.     

The effect of scopolamine and physostigmine on working and reference memory in pigeons

A comparison of the effects of scopolamine and physostigmine on working memory and reference memory in White Carneaux pigeons was undertaken. In Experiment 1, the pigeons received injections of scopolamine hydrobromide (0.03 mg/kg), or saline. Scopolamine hydrobromide had greater disruptive effects on working memory trials than on reference memory trials, and the centrally active form of scopolamine disrupted working memory trial accuracy more than the peripherally active form. The differential sensitivity of accuracy on working memory trials to disruption by central cholinergic blockade was obtained even though the discrimination required on reference memory trials was more difficult. In Experiment 2, the pigeons received injections of scopolamine hydrobromide (0.015 mg/kg), physostigmine (0.075 mg/kg) both scopolamine and physostigmine, or saline. Physostigmine given with scopolamine was able to reverse the scopolamine-induced reduction of accuracy on working memory trials. In neither study did scopolamine promote accelerated forgetting as the delay interval was increased. These results indicate that manipulation of central cholinergic neurotransmitter systems influences working memory processes in the pigeon, but these effects occur without alterations in the ability of the birds to actively maintain information during the retention interval.     

Epinephrine Effects on Memory Are Not Dependent on Hepatic Glucose Release

Epinephrine released or administered soon after a given training task modulates memory processes. Since epinephrine does not readily cross the blood–brain barrier, studies have suggested that some of the central effects of epinephrine might be mediated by peripheral release of glucose. These experiments examined the involvement of blood glucose levels in the posttraining effects of peripherally administered epinephrine. The effects of the administration of epinephrine (25 and 625 mg/kg) on memory of an inhibitory avoidance task were evaluated in fed and fasted rats (depleted glycogen stores in liver). Blood glucose levels after the task in each group were also measured. Female Wistar rats were divided in two groups. Fed and 48-h-fasted animals were submitted to the inhibitory avoidance task and received ip epinephrine or saline immediately after training. The test session was carried out 48 h after training. Epinephrine (25 or 625 mg/kg) caused an increased glycemia in fed rats, but no effect was observed in fasted animals. Administration of epinephrine 25 mg/kg induced a facilitation of memory, while epinephrine 625 mg/kg impaired retention (either in fasted or in fed animals). There was no relation between increased glycemia induced by epinephrine and its effects on memory, since this drug presented its classical effects independently of the previous state of the animal (fed or fasted). The results of the present study suggest that the effects of systemic released or administered epinephrine on memory processes are not dependent on hepatic glucose release.