敬奉上清经法验

一、姚生诵《黄庭经》验 据道书记载：晋哀帝兴宁三年（公元３６４年）,南岳夫人魏华存授其弟子《黄庭经》。魏华存元君,字贤安,任城人,幼而好道,志慕神仙,修成道果。 《黄庭经》有《黄庭内景玉经》、《黄庭外景玉经》、《黄庭中景玉经》,简称《黄庭经》。《黄庭内经玉经》又名《上清黄庭内景经》,收人《正统道藏》。另《道藏》与《道藏辑要》、《云茬七签》收有数种《黄庭经》注本。《黄庭经》重在存思黄庭,炼养丹田,又以积精累气为要诀,全经反映了上清派修道成仙的思想,此经是道教一部重要的经书。《黄庭内景经》经文分三十六…     

《黄庭经》

道教经典。《太上黄庭外景玉经》及《太上黄庭内景玉经》之概称。据道教释义,黄者中央之色,喻中央”;庭者四方之中,阶前空地,喻“中空”。黄庭之景,意谓道教修炼功夫之中空景象。《黄庭经》作者,传说殊多。或谓魏夫人(名华存、晋司徒魏舒之女)研审民间草本后所撰,或谓道士口授,魏氏记录而成。成书年代,《外景》始见于葛洪     

《黄庭经》养生教育思想探微

《黄庭经》是道教主要经典之一,是一部谈养生修真之术的道教经书。现传世的《黄庭经》有三种：《黄庭内景经》、《黄庭外景经》、《黄庭中景经》,但《黄庭中景经》系后人所作,因而《道藏》仅收录内、外二经,《黄庭经》即指该二经的合称。《黄庭经》养生教育思想围绕长生久视、强身健体之目的,立足于哲学与医学两大基础,以存思内视、漱咽津液、吐纳行气、服气积精为主干,兼容恬淡虚无、心专意精、守一养神、脏腑调养等原则与方法,形成了融养生、医学、哲学与宗教于一体的名垂道教教育思想史的养生教育方法导论。笔者不揣浅陋,欲作初…     

黄庭经讲义

《黄庭经》不著撰人姓氏,也不著年代,世传由晋魏夫人流传下来,当是魏晋间道流所作。隋唐时出现《黄庭内景经》,由此原《黄庭经》称为《外景经》,而《黄庭经》之名成为内、外两篇的总称。其后又有《中景经》,宋郑樵《通志》中曾有著录,《道藏》     

封面说明

唐人临《黄庭经》卷,佚名。纸本,手卷,26.3cm×106.3cm。历代书法家所抄写的《黄庭经》,为《太上黄庭外景玉经》,约成书于魏晋之际。葛洪的《抱朴子·遐览篇》中已有著录。一般认为该经出于《黄庭内景经》之前,亦有人认为出于《内景经》之后。     

上清派炼养术的藏象学说内涵探讨

上清派是道教的一个重要流派,形成于魏晋时期,创始人相传为西晋女道士魏华存。该派以《上清经》、《黄庭经》、《真诰》等道书为主要经典,以存思、守神、行气、服食为主要修炼手段,对道学及中医学都有着深远的影响。魏晋时     

道教辞典

内景 指“至人”的内在境界。《荀子·解蔽》:“浊明外景,清明内景。”杨倞注:“景,光色也。……清而明者,内景,谓至人之内明也。”指阴幽含气之物。《大戴礼记·曾子天圆篇》:“天道日圆,地道曰方,方曰幽而圆曰明。明者,吐气者也,是故外景。幽者,含气者也,是故内景。故火曰外景,而金水内景。”又称“内象”。道教名词。指身内景象,包括血肉、筋骨、脏腑之象及诸“身神”等。《黄庭内景经》为道教内景论文专著,务成子《解题》云:“黄庭内者,心也;景者,象也。……内象论,即血肉、筋骨、藏府之象也。心居身内,存观一体之象也,故曰内景。”又     

书刊信息

中国道教协会道教经书简介一、《黄庭经讲义》作者:陈撄宁小32K本,约五万字《黄庭经》为道教讲述炼养的重要经典,分《内景经》、《外景经》二篇。我会已故会长、著名道教学者陈撄宁先生就《黄庭经》二篇义蕴,沉潜探索,择其精要,以深入浅出的文字,分类诠释,使其词能解,理可通,便于读者理解和学习。《讲义》后附《道藏》本《黄庭内景经》、《黄庭外景经》原文。定价:批发0.80元,另售1.00 二、《神经衰弱静功疗养法问答》作者:陈撄宁小32K本,约一万七千字本书为我国近代著名道教学者、养生学家、中国道教协会已故会长陈撄宁先生于1957年8月,应杭州市屏风山疗养院邀请讲学而编写的。     

苏轼与《黄庭经》

道教上清派经典《黄庭经》在宋代颇为盛行。苏轼道学修养深厚,《黄庭经》对其影响较为深刻。具体体现为:苏轼在其诗文创作中,大量引用《黄庭经》中的词汇和故事,诗歌内容、体式模仿《黄庭经》。苏轼的养生思想、生活态度、艺术观等受到了《黄庭经》的影响。苏轼对《黄庭经》的接受对其子苏过也有一定影响。     

也谈唾液的功效与养生

唾液,又称琼浆、玉液、甘露、金律,俗称口水。吞咽此“华池之水”具有“玉液还丹”及“炼津化精”之功,另有“祛病延年”之效。此法,乃道家修炼养生的一种重要手段。《黄庭经外景经》曰:“玉池清水灌灵根,审能修之可长寿。”陶弘景在《养性延年录》中云:“唾不咽,则海不润,海不润则律液乏,是知服元气,饮醴泉,乃延年之本也。”孙思邈在《养生铭》中也说:“晨兴漱玉津,可祛病益寿。”灵根,是指口腔中的唾液泉,既腮腺、舌下腺及颌下腺,一般人每天可产唾液1000毫升以上。常吞此津不但可调治百病,帮助消化,而且还可美容驻颜。《黄庭经》曰:“口为…     

易道辩正

易道是易学思想的精髓或内在精神,其最根本的特征是所谓的“一阴一阳之道”。作为易学结构基元的易卦卦象符号,与阴阳观念具有先天性的亲和力,从而使得阴阳观念有了一个可以符号化表征的形式系统。在汉代,阴阳五行与易学成为一个统一的有机整体。两汉的象数理论试图将易道(天道)完全形式化努力的最终结果是“入于礻几祥”,成为一套牵强附会的繁琐哲学。魏晋以后,诸如“时”、“中”一类具有明显的个人独知默会、参悟修证意义的命题,逐渐成为一阴一阳、生生不息的“易道”最为生动的表征。道之真谛,若以易理言之,就是“自强不息”,“与时偕行”。     

"全球伦理"与"文明的冲突"

自美国9.11恐怖袭击事件后,塞缪尔.亨廷顿关于“文明冲突”的理论引起人们高度兴趣。以宗教为核心的文明之间的冲突真的难以化解吗?汉斯.昆的“全球伦理”观点对此提出挑战。本文将浅析一下“全球伦理”,及其化解“文明冲突”的可能性。     

方术迷信的"灵验"揭秘

方术作为中华神秘文化的一个重要的组成部分,是一种既不同于宗教又与宗教有联系的企图借助于“鬼神”等神秘力量来消灾免祸、延年益寿、添财加福的可操作性的东西,如八卦术、算命术、风水术、占梦术、测字术、巫术等。 方术尽管是唯心的不可相信的东西,在历代也遭到了一些人的攻击和批判,然而为何屡不绝迹,有时甚至风靡一时、影响很大,即使在今天仍然有其市场呢?其中一个重要的原因在于一些人认为方术“灵验”。 方术“灵验”的原因是什么?到底是哪些因素     

"Psychotherapy" versus "treatment"

Presents a comment on "Psychological treatments" by D. H. Barlow. Barlow proposed that we distinguish between the terms "treatment" and "psychotherapy." The author believes that not only is the distinction unnecessary, but that its implications could have negative consequences for the field of clinical psychology. It is the proposed distinguishing feature that treatments are "specifically tailored to the pathological process that is causing the impairment and distress" that is most problematic. Clinical psychology does not need a distinction that further exacerbates the split between researchers and practitioners.     

"Enmeshment" and "Fusion"

The paper examines two related concepts utilized by two different schools of family therapy. Any family seen to be "enmeshed" is also seen as "fused," and vice versa. The difference in the level of focus, on the "system containing the individuals" (structural) or the "individual in the system" (fusion), determines the difference in therapeutic approach of these two schools.     

"本体论"与"伦理学"--形而上学的两个向度

形而上学有两个密切相关的内在向度,就是本体论向度与伦理学向度.在哲学史上,哲学家们之所以在"追求形而上学"的同时,又总是"反形而上学",并非是人们的形上本性出了问题,而是因为人们总是将形而上学视为单纯的"一维性",总是用一个向度来取代或遮蔽另一个向度.而所谓的"后形而上学思想",也并不是消解了形而上学,而是指形而上学从"本体论向度"转向了"伦理学向度".     

“对的”与“好的”

什么是“对的”,和对它的证立,是道德哲学中具有争议性的核心问题,也是效用主义和道义论间的主要差异之所在。统合效用主义对于“好的就是对的”这个陈述有一套完整周延的说法。而道义论对这个问题的证立不够周延或没有足够的说服力。     

The development of children's understanding of "because" and "so"

Children's (5 years, 8 months to 8 years, 4 months) comprehension of "because" and "so" was assessed on both enactment and sentence completion tasks. The use of a within-subject design permitted performance on each task to be interpreted in terms of performance on the other. The pattern of results provided evidence against a componential model for the acquisition of causal connectives. This model holds that the two meaning components (cause, order) are acquired separately, with the order component being acquired several years later than the causal component. The results also were in accord with predictions derived from a contextual model of children's developing understanding of terms expressing logical relationships. This model posits that the understanding of relational terms is initially context dependent, such that children can understand relational terms when they express familiar relationships, but experience difficulty in forming representations of novel relationships solely on the basis of linguistic input. The lexical components of because and so are understood during the context-dependent stage, and the transition from context-dependent to context-independent understanding does not reflect further lexical development, but rather increasing facility in dealing with decontextualized linguistic input.     

Comparison of two theories of "ratio" and "difference" judgments

This article examines the hypothesis that judges compare stimuli by ratio and subtractive operations when instructed to judge" "ratios" and "differences." Rule and Curtis hold that magnitude estimations are a power function of subjective values, with an exponent between 1.1 and 2.1. Accordingly, the two-operation model tested assumes magnitude estimations of "ratios" are a comparable power function of subjective ratios. In contrast, Birnbaum and Veit theorize that judges compare two stimuli by subraction for both "ratio" and "difference" instructions and that magnitude estimations of "ratios" are approximately an exponential function of subjective differences. Three tests were used to compare the theory of one operation with the two-operation theory for the data of nine experiments. The results strongly favor the theory that observers use the same operation for both instructions.