共查询到17条相似文献,搜索用时 0 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Jonathan Vaughan 《Behavior research methods》2001,33(2):297-298
Notices and Announcements
Measuring Behavior 2002 4th International Conference on Methods and Techniques in Behavioral Research Amsterdam, The Netherlands 27–30 August 2000 相似文献7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
The first world wide symposium on the topic of gender-specific medicine provided the latest research on differences in sex
and/or gender in medicine and medical care. The presentations ranged beyond the topic of reproduction to encompass the entire
human organism. This report critically reviews three issues that emerged during the Conference: gender mainstreaming, the
concept of sex/gender differences and the issue of men's health. It suggests that the interdisciplinary concept of gender-specific
medicine has to be mirrored by the integration of social and cultural studies into medical research and practice. 相似文献
12.
13.
Stefan Eriksson 《Studia Theologica》2013,67(2):129-144
The terminology of righteousness and justification is found in several parts of the New Testament, with a clear preponderance in Paul's letters, especially Romans and Galatians. The only other two documents with a comparatively high percentage of such terminology are Matthew and James, not only with regard to the noun and the adjective but also to the causative verb .1 Studies on the Theology of Paul contain longer passages on “justification by faith” of course.2 It should not be forgotten, however, that, as the Dead Sea Scrolls re-documented, the Jewish tradition was well aware of the notion of “justified by grace”.3 The New Testament authors took over both the terminology and theological implications from the Jewish heritage.4 This is certainly true for Paul but not necessarily so for James. Rather, it seems that James reacts to a tradition which has its roots in early Christianity, more precisely in Paul (we shall resume that item later). In both cases, the authors do not explain the terminology of justification and righteousness. They adopt it from their antecedents and add their understanding from their own vantage points. Their interpretations, and this is the major point of the present contribution, use language from other backgrounds; the language is in both cases of a personal nature. This fact implies that, for them, the traditional terminology was no longer sufficient to express what was actually meant. 相似文献
14.
Helen Au Yeung 《British Journal of Guidance & Counselling》2016,44(4):477-483
In their article, Lang and Gardiner draw support from the Treaty of Waitangi to deconstruct cultural dominance and reconstruct a framework, which promotes bicultural pluralism in the new counsellor education programme at the Massey University. However, they omit significant details of the Treaty and therefore mislead the audience to think that the Treaty has always served its purpose to protect Māori and the colonisers all the time. They develop a new counselling framework ‘ARC?=?Attend Reflect Collaborate’ which merely describes what has happened or what should have happened in counselling. It fails to address the need to raise a counsellor's awareness of his or her own cultural identity and understanding of the worldview of a culturally different client before counselling starts. 相似文献
15.
16.
17.
K. Daniel OLeary 《Behavior Therapy》1974,5(2):277-278